President Trump 2.0

Originally Posted by papa smurf

i found it a bit sick to see the orange pillock saluting the bodies of those Americans he's responsible for killing with his stupid war

In his stupid MAGA hat and open neck shirt.

I’m told Fox News re-edited footage of Trump so he didn’t look like a disrespectful scruff bag.

Originally Posted by Chris

In his stupid MAGA hat and open neck shirt.

I’m told Fox News re-edited footage of Trump so he didn’t look like a disrespectful scruff bag.

They showed footage from a previous ceremony in December, without a hat - apparently, by mistake...

One of the fun things in this calamity is watching all the Trump supporters who claimed he was anti-war twist to justify this.

To be fair, some have broken with him over this. They are calling it out, but even for them to have to wonder how gullible and stupid they were to buy that Trump was the anti-war candidate. Whereas others are just ignoring how anti-Iran intervention they were to support Trump no matter what.

Absolute marks the lot of them.

[thenry]

I still prefer him instead of the alternative, Kamala Harris.

This no war thing was forced upon him by a religious hatred of Israel. Rinse and repeat anybody?

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by thenry

I still prefer him instead of the alternative, Kamala Harris.

This no war thing was forced upon him by a religious hatred of Israel. Rinse and repeat anybody?

The country would have been more stable under Harris.

Also the no war thing was NOT forced upon him, he campaigned on no wars, no regime changes and being the president of peace!

Yet more lies from him.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Stephen

The country would have been more stable under Harris.

Also the no war thing was NOT forced upon him, he campaigned on no wars, no regime changes and being the president of peace!

Yet more lies from him.

he's got the FIFA piss prize

[jem]

Originally Posted by papa smurf

he's got the FIFA piss prize

You mean ‘the Precious’?

USA medical treatment may be expensive, but they can achieve some impressive results…

https://www.aol.com/articles/trump-m...225949703.html

"All of the people that died through the roadside bombs. Died and are, right now, walking around with no legs, no arms," Trump said during the news conference, following remarks to Republicans.

[papa smurf]

Zombie cyborgs

Still dont understand how the Americans cannot see how senile he is becoming.

Originally Posted by Paul

Still dont understand how the Americans cannot see how senile he is becoming.

They can see

However if they have him removed more than 12 months before the end of his term, Vance will replace him until 2028 and while he is then more or less a shoo-in for the Republican nomination for the next election, he will be term-limited and only eligible to serve one full term as president in his own right. If they leave it until the beginning of next year to have Trump declared unfit under the 25th Amendment, then Vance gets a 12-month run-in as president and is then able to stand for election for 2028-31 and (assuming he wins) for re-election for 2032-35.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Damien

One of the fun things in this calamity is watching all the Trump supporters who claimed he was anti-war twist to justify this.

To be fair, some have broken with him over this. They are calling it out, but even for them to have to wonder how gullible and stupid they were to buy that Trump was the anti-war candidate. Whereas others are just ignoring how anti-Iran intervention they were to support Trump no matter what.

Absolute marks the lot of them.

The worst offender being JD Vance who was elected on such a mandate.

Where the hell is JD Vance?’: Why Trump’s VP is missing in action

In January 2023, JD Vance decided to let bygones be bygones and back the probable Republican presidential nominee.

His pitch to the American people was simple, as he laid out in an article for the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) announcing his endorsement: “Trump’s Best Foreign Policy? Not Starting Any Wars.”

It was a stark indication of Mr Vance’s own political strategy. The 41-year-old former US marine, who was deployed to Iraq, had long argued against American intervention abroad, from supplying weapons to Ukraine, to the invasion of Iraq.

“American taxpayer money has continued to flow to Ukraine,” he wrote in the WSJ. “A wiser foreign policy wouldn’t have let such conduct go unnoticed.”
Three years later, sitting in the White House beside the man he once compared to Adolf Hitler, Mr Vance has been notably quiet since the president chose to launch devastating strikes on Iran, weeks after raiding Venezuela and capturing its president.

As Republicans rushed to praise the strikes Mr Vance, a prolific social media presence, was notably silent for almost 72 hours, aside from reposting official administration content.

In November 2024, Mr Vance argued explicitly against US military action in Iran.“Our interest, I think, very much is in not going to war with Iran,” he said on a podcast. “It would be a huge distraction of resources. It would be massively expensive to our country.” In an April 2024 speech on the senate floor, he cited his own experience serving in Iraq as the basis for his scepticism of interventionism.

https://archive.ph/5dXiR#selection-3467.0-3503.55