Post-Brexit Thread - Page 173

1andrew1 · 10-11-2016, 09:59

[QUOTE=papa smurf;35868904]

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456

As regards factual inaccuracies no-one has said we send £350m per week to Brussels. All that has been said is that our total bill to Brussels equates to £350m per week.[/QUOT

try posting in Klingon -the message might get through there's no point in trying to Klingon we are leaving .

its sad that all they have left as an argument is a bus with a slogan on it ding ding all aboard next stop- Brexit...

If you do get a chance to review the thread, you'll find that my point is hoping that we will all learn from this campaign and that such glaring mistruths can be avoided in the future.

**Chris** · 10-11-2016, 10:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf

try posting in Klingon -the message might get through there's no point in trying to Klingon we are leaving .

qaStaHvIS maH mej 'uch 'e' nID lang pagh tu'lu'

Apparently.

papa smurf · 10-11-2016, 17:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1;

If you do get a chance to review the thread, you'll find that my point is hoping that we will all learn from this campaign and that such glaring mistruths can be avoided in the future[/B

.

[/B]

ah hummmmm

pip08456 · 10-11-2016, 17:42

[QUOTE=1andrew1;35868910]

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf

If you do get a chance to review the thread, you'll find that my point is hoping that we will all learn from this campaign and that such glaring mistruths can be avoided in the future.

Would that be when pigs finally learn how to fly?

**Paul** · 10-11-2016, 18:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris

qaStaHvIS maH mej 'uch 'e' nID lang pagh tu'lu'
Apparently.

"I went out, we will try to hold there is no thin"

**Chris** · 10-11-2016, 22:27

To be fair, reversing a google translate on any human language is likely to be equally mangled ...

**Damien** · 11-11-2016, 17:31

Looks like the Government might say Article 50 is reversible in order to win the appeal: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...yers-may-argue

**Chris** · 11-11-2016, 17:50

I'd say that's their only grounds for appeal - that the high court has misconstrued the A50 process. If invoking it does not of necessity remove us from the EU, then the government's actions can't de facto lead to the striking down of the ECA 1972, a piece of primary legislation which quite properly can only be repealed by parliament.

11-11-2016, 19:58

It makes no sense to have a 2 year time limit on a process that is reversible .The sole intention of invoking A50 is to leave the EU so how can there be legal provision to revoke it ?

**Damien** · 11-11-2016, 20:11

Also if they do this then aren't they committing to a Parliamentary vote at the end of the process? Which, if the deal isn't good, might cause more of a problem than if they held a vote now.

11-11-2016, 21:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Also if they do this then aren't they committing to a Parliamentary vote at the end of the process? Which, if the deal isn't good, might cause more of a problem than if they held a vote now.

That's how i see it ,far better to let Parliament have it's day now ,knowing that it will vote to invoke A50 ,after that has been done the government can negotiate a deal without the worry that Parliament may use any deal as political blackmail .Also wouldn't that give the SNP ammunition ? allowing them to block Brexit ?

**Damien** · 11-11-2016, 23:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh

That's how i see it ,far better to let Parliament have it's day now ,knowing that it will vote to invoke A50 ,after that has been done the government can negotiate a deal without the worry that Parliament may use any deal as political blackmail .Also wouldn't that give the SNP ammunition ? allowing them to block Brexit ?

I think they're more likely to have trouble with a vote when 'the deal' isn't an abstraction. If they get a complicated, less than perfect, deal which would have an impact on certain parts of the country then that becomes a bigger problem than if she just asks for the right to issue it now.

Also from the EU's view if they knew she had to go back to get permission from Parliament they'll have a stronger hand.

Tactually I would think it makes sense to have a vote now. Personally I would prefer one on the terms of the deal itself because I don't think May should have a free pass on this but that's a different question.

1andrew1 · 12-11-2016, 14:44

http://newsthump.com/2016/11/12/nico...cotland-match/

TheDaddy · 13-11-2016, 06:34

66% of our fellow brits are nothing more than treacherous swine according to this poll, how dare they demand information, it didn't seem to bother some people a couple of months back

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-eu-farron-may

papa smurf · 13-11-2016, 09:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

66% of our fellow brits are nothing more than treacherous swine according to this poll, how dare they demand information, it didn't seem to bother some people a couple of months back

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-eu-farron-may

i have just got up and i'm a little blurry and worst for wear but i have read the poorly written piece and i can find no mention of the treacherous swine you speak of

this is nothing more than a remoan , now come on all aboard the brexit bus ding ding bagsie the back seat

ps thats one ugly anarchist in the picture