The gender ideology thread

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Hugh

Strange - previously you stated



Anything more than one is a rise, and the old shibboleth of "widely reported in social media"...

And if you read that article, a lot of them were just changing signs on single-user units, at a cost of very little...

They were just 2 articles, one of which from 3 years ago mentioned over 740 conversions. I did make a search and came across other examples. Plenty of examples of councils, universities, and hospitals being involved. The public sector ones are more likely to be reported than private sector ones, which will just simply happen behind the scenes.

The Supreme Court ruling last week was the moment the dam was breached. The flood of consequences for public sector bodies who took advice from activists instead of lawyers is now beginning.

A judge has ordered that Scottish schools must provide single-sex lavatories for pupils after parents won a legal fight against a council which insisted on installing only gender-neutral facilities.
In a case hailed as the “first of many” in which the rights of women and girls will be upheld following last week’s Supreme Court ruling, Scottish Borders council conceded it had been wrong to flout the law by installing no sex-segregated bathrooms at the new Earlston Primary School.

From the Times, non-paywall link: https://archive.ph/F1ZB7

Swivel-eyed gender loon Maggie Chapman MSP, who thinks there is no conflict of interest in being deputy chair of the Holyrood Equalities Committee whilst publicly decrying the Supreme Court for “bigotry, prejudice and hatred” for knowing what a woman is, has survived an attempt to sack her.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1meyvpl30eo

Utterly shameless Chapman defied convention to vote in her own favour (basic decency suggested she should have abstained from a vote in which she had a personal interest). But what really saved her were the three SNP MSPs who also voted against the motion to oust her.

Honestly, nobody has very high expectations of anyone in the Scottish Greens but we used to think the SNP (Shameless for Scotland) was capable of better.

[RichardCoulter]

The BMA have voted to describe the Supreme Court ruling as 'Scientifically illiterate and biologically non sensical':

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2741304.html

Who cares ?

It’s a sobering ‘they walk among us’ moment, as some of these dimwits hold our lives in their hands.

They don’t get to define what biology is, naturally, not least because the BMA is just a trade union. The BMA is a pretty good example of the phenomenon of ‘institutional capture’. You get a few highly motivated campaigners into the committee and suddenly they’re pushing through motions applauding this and condemning that and more often than not making utter fools of themselves and by extension, their entire organisation.

[Jaymoss]

Oh dear God. This really is the world we live in now. When Doctors can do this.

"Doctor I identify and a sabre tooth tiger"
"You need therapy you have an personality disorder"

"Doctor I am really a woman cut off my willy"
"Ok Miss Moss I will get on to that straight away"

2025 for ya

Originally Posted by Paul

Who cares ?

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by Jaymoss

Oh dear God. This really is the world we live in now. When Doctors can do this.

"Doctor I identify and a sabre tooth tiger"
"You need therapy you have an personality disorder"

"Doctor I am really a woman cut off my willy"
"Ok Miss Moss I will get on to that straight away"

2025 for ya

Not really 2025. Trans people have existed forever.

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Paul

Who cares ?

They have power and influence. That's why it matters.

---------- Post added at 10:46 ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 ----------

Originally Posted by Stephen

Not really 2025. Trans people have existed forever.

I think I'm fat, when they're not. Ozempic?
I think my leg doesn't belong to me. Amputation?
I think everything's dirty.
I think I'm Jesus Christ/Napoleon etc?

Originally Posted by Stephen

Not really 2025. Trans people have existed forever.

A statement often made but seldom quantified. Perhaps you have some examples?

Bear in mind I’m not asking you to show that people in history sometimes liked to dress like the opposite sex, or dearly wished they were the opposite sex, but somehow believed that they could think themselves into the opposite sex and then insist everyone else go along with it.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Stephen

Not really 2025. Trans people have existed forever.

yet, when their bones are dug up and DNA tested, it will only advise what biological sex they were.

[Stephen]

I mean going back to ancient Greece and Egypt there was even a recognised third gender and many civilisations and countries that had records and history of what in the modern age is considered transgender. Instead of what's considered transvestite of someone just dressing in the clothes of the opposite sex.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_history

[Jaymoss]

Originally Posted by Stephen

I mean going back to ancient Greece and Egypt there was even a recognised third gender and many civilisations and countries that had records and history of what in the modern age is considered transgender. Instead of what's considered transvestite of someone just dressing in the clothes of the opposite sex.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_history

Yeah mental illness will date back to the dawn of man

[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Stephen

I mean going back to ancient Greece and Egypt there was even a recognised third gender and many civilisations and countries that had records and history of what in the modern age is considered transgender. Instead of what's considered transvestite of someone just dressing in the clothes of the opposite sex.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_history

Typical nonsense.
Wanting selected aspects of a societal role is NOT wanting to change gender.
3rd gender are non-sexual roles which can be assigned by their parents or the person chooses it, with the option to STOP. Eg Catholic Priests.