You are here: Home | Forum | Updated: Boris resigns as party leader
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
__________________ Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
The question i have to ask is what was going on that prompted the denial that Rayner was there.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
he watches and likes things that agree with his views, and doesn’t like things that don’t, and the things that don’t agree with his views, he believes are biased
Hmmmm. Hope that helps…………
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Labour say it was a mistake made in good faith to deny she was there. Sorry but, “faith” & “good” are incompatible in the same sentence as Labour.
The no 1 woman in the labour party and they forget she was there, smells like BS to me.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Not an authentic news outlet, don’t trust the source. Try Googling harder.
It's been going since 1870. What makes it not authentic?
---------- Post added at 22:21 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
It is absolutely clear, but the Labour luvvies in this thread are blind to the facts that the rules were clear, Boris got caught out, only fair that when Labour’s rank hypocrisy stinks, when they’re clearly just as guilty of lying and breaking lockdown rules, they get called out as well.
If you're talking about Damien, Hugh and me then sorry to spoil your idealistic fantasy but none of us are Labour luvvies. We're just keen on combating disinformation, wherever that disinformation is coming from.
---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itshim
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
How is that different from those at No 10 paying their fines?
exactly my point . Need to ask the Labour leader right load of bs was his answer . "She paid the fines end of the matter . " Or words to that effect but a lot more
The only people who seemed to have resigned have been those having affairs - Matt Hancock and Neil Ferguson.
---------- Post added at 22:28 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Labour say it was a mistake made in good faith to deny she was there. Sorry but, “faith” & “good” are incompatible in the same sentence as Labour.
Do you not feel that sentence demonstrates a little prejudice when analysing the situation?
Stating facts isn’t "turning cartwheels’ (well, not for most of us).
So quoting GBNews is confirming my "bias"? Surely the fact that diverse media outlets (including local media quoting Durham Police) are reporting the same thing reflects a lack of bias?
__________________ Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
It's been going since 1870. What makes it not authentic?
---------- Post added at 22:21 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ----------
If you're talking about Damien, Hugh and me then sorry to spoil your idealistic fantasy but none of us are Labour luvvies. We're just keen on combating disinformation, wherever that disinformation is coming from.
---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------
The only people who seemed to have resigned have been those having affairs - Matt Hancock and Neil Ferguson.
---------- Post added at 22:28 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------
Do you not feel that sentence demonstrates a little prejudice when analysing the situation?
But you have not combated any disinformation, in fact your spreading it by spouting the Starmer lies that no rules were broken, when video evidence of him holding and swigging from a beer bottle, socialising indoors with people he isn’t household members with, half way up the country in Durham.
---------- Post added at 00:55 ---------- Previous post was at 00:33 ----------
I don’t normally credit BBC here but at the time, Sophie Raworth tears squirming Starmer, a new hole. This interview was back in January:
But you have not combated any disinformation, in fact your spreading it by spouting the Starmer lies that no rules were broken, when video evidence of him holding and swigging from a beer bottle, socialising indoors with people he isn’t household members with, half way up the country in Durham.
---------- Post added at 00:55 ---------- Previous post was at 00:33 ----------
I don’t normally credit BBC here but at the time, Sophie Raworth tears squirming Starmer, a new hole. This interview was back in January:
That's easy enough to do.I hate the man.
__________________ Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
Then why the hell are they re-looking at Starmers lockdown beer Durham case again?
They're not. The police just confirmed receipt of the MP's letter. He claimed that meant they were opening up the case. I don't blame anyone for believing an MP but please prepare yourself for disappointment if you're hoping for the case to be re-opened.
---------- Post added at 11:32 ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
But you have not combated any disinformation, in fact your spreading it by spouting the Starmer lies that no rules were broken, when video evidence of him holding and swigging from a beer bottle, socialising indoors with people he isn’t household members with, half way up the country in Durham.
The matter was investigated and he was cleared. No lawyer has put their neck on the line and said otherwise. If it's as clear cut as you say it is, that would have happened. Unless you think all lawyers are Labour voters?
You don’t have to be a lawyer to say he’s broken the rules, which at face value, he has.
I feel this should be re-investigated especially now that new evidence has been uncovered about who was in attendance despite their previous attempts at a cover up.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
I'm not bothered about the rising costs of fuel & food, or the triple lock pension that isn't.
I'm just over the moon to see the effort put into all this tomfoolery about who lied about being where they weren't when there was or wasn't a meeting and if it was before or after a certain date, the importance of which is mind blowing in the grand scheme of things.
I'm off to mow the lawns
__________________
'The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it' ~ T. Pratchett
I'm not bothered about the rising costs of fuel & food, or the triple lock pension that isn't.
I'm just over the moon to see the effort put into all this tomfoolery about who lied about being where they weren't when there was or wasn't a meeting and if it was before or after a certain date, the importance of which is mind blowing in the grand scheme of things.
I'm off to mow the lawns
If starmer is so sure no laws were broken he should encourage a thorough investigation with all the facts on the table , but atm is seems that no effort has been put in by the police to investigate this possible criminal breach of covid legislation .
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
There was to be no in door mixing of with non-same household people, sharing of food was prohibited, it wasn’t his regular place of work and what makes this even more worse now, is the lies that Angela Rayner wasn’t there but then they admit she was.
Join CF
You are here: 
