Football Season 2010/2011
04-04-2011, 21:43
|
#1606
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,719
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK
Well it looks like its going to be two which is ridiculous. Had it been any other the player it wouldn't have got a mention, but because its Rooney its all over the papers and the FA have quite happily wilted under the pressure. It will be intresting to see how many managers, players and staff members get bans from now on for swearing when a cameras on them.
|
Again. Drogba. Also Fabregas was vilified for a week or so after he alleged comments directed towards a referee during the Everton game. It's not simply because it's Rooney.
Also it's disingenuous to suggest that this is akin to the cameras picking up a swear word from a player or manager who are going about the game. Rooney wasn't caught when the cameras were on him, he looked to the camera and shouted down it.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 21:49
|
#1607
|
argh
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 47
Services: full house package
Posts: 4,327
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
problem with Rooney is that he is a good player but there is just a lot lacking between the ears.
2 games is light but saying that the word that has been used is basically normal language in schools now anyways.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 21:56
|
#1608
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,281
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Firstly Drogba was banned for 3 games not 4. Secondly it wasn't because he swore, it was comments made to and about the referee. Fabregas has never been banned for swearing and i don't think any player ever has. Surely if the FA feel the need to ban a player for swearing at a camera they should feel the need to ban a player swearing at a referee or official? I doubt it, unless its Rooney doing the swearing probably.
You would think the FA have more important things to do, like looking at Essiens tackle against stoke (which has barely been mentioned in the papers) or the racist abuse some west ham fans were giving out, obviously not.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:01
|
#1609
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 40
Posts: 1,025
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK
Firstly Drogba was banned for 3 games not 4. Secondly it wasn't because he swore, it was comments made to and about the referee. Fabregas has never been banned for swearing and i don't think any player ever has. Surely if the FA feel the need to ban a player for swearing at a camera they should feel the need to ban a player swearing at a referee or official? I doubt it, unless its Rooney doing the swearing probably.
You would think the FA have more important things to do, like looking at Essiens tackle against stoke (which has barely been mentioned in the papers) or the racist abuse some west ham fans were giving out, obviously not.
|
The bold part is quite funny considering Rooney is renowned for his abuse of officials during play, for which he's never been punished. Often when he feels hard done by he, as clear as day, swears at officials. Yet you're seriously now saying if Rooney (the goody two shoes that he is, clearly) abused officials he'd be banned. Talk about red tinted glasses.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:07
|
#1610
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,281
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niles Crane
The bold part is quite funny considering Rooney is renowned for his endless abuse of officials during play, for which he's never been punished. Often when he feels hard done by he, as clear as day, swears at officials. Yet you're seriously now saying if Rooney abused officials he'd be banned. Talk about red tinted glasses.
|
Yes, so why hasn't he been banned before then? Why has this only been started now, in the run-in to the end of the season?
The FA rule is "A participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour." So why hasn't every player who swears during a game been given a two match ban? Theres nothing in the rule to say that it has to be directed at a camera to get a ban.
I'm not defending what he did, he was an idiot, but a two game ban is ridiculous.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:23
|
#1611
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
I think the FA are pathetic, I gave up being a ref, as to me the whole football hierachy is a total joke.
The FA are puppets and won't hit the big boys hard, and fine or suspend players or Managers for swearing at officials, the antics that Terry, Droga or Rooney or any PL player, yet clubs in the lower divisions get hit so hard it a tragedy.
I gave up being an official, due to this problem, and to me if it is good enough for lower league clubs, then its good enough for the big boys.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:26
|
#1612
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,719
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK
Yes, so why hasn't he been banned before then? Why has this only been started now, in the run-in to the end of the season?
The FA rule is "A participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour." So why hasn't every player who swears during a game been given a two match ban? Theres nothing in the rule to say that it has to be directed at a camera to get a ban.
I'm not defending what he did, he was an idiot, but a two game ban is ridiculous.
|
I think there is a clear difference between a player doing it on the pitch where he happens to be caught (and it's usually not audible as the mics are on the sides) and doing it down the camera where it's obviously and intentionally going to be audible.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:39
|
#1613
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Rooney is a big headed git, and from what l have heard and read, he ran straight up to the camera and said the abusive language, If that audible, l don't know what is.
And not only that, if l was the camera guy, l would have had him done, for using foul and abusive langauge. He is a little baby with the dummy still stuck in his gob and paid a lot of money for what - l have seen better players than him on a cold Sunday morning playing at Warren Farm.
|
|
|
04-04-2011, 22:47
|
#1614
|
Oh Lanky Lanky.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,038
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Rooney is a big headed git, and from what l have heard and read, he ran straight up to the camera and said the abusive language,
|
Not quite true, he was walking along with team mates either side, these two man camera operators actually run onto the pitch and shove the camera in the players faces, they are hoping that like Gerrard earlier in the season and Noble in this game that the player may kiss the lens to give them a good picture, Rooney was speaking directly to the camera men, he was in front of Man Utd supporters so he wasn't having a go at the crowd.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 06:35
|
#1615
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,156
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Rooney is a big headed git, and from what l have heard and read, he ran straight up to the camera and said the abusive language,
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Not quite true, he was walking along with team mates either side, these two man camera operators actually run onto the pitch and shove the camera in the players faces, they are hoping that like Gerrard earlier in the season and Noble in this game that the player may kiss the lens to give them a good picture, Rooney was speaking directly to the camera men, he was in front of Man Utd supporters so he wasn't having a go at the crowd.
|
The big headed git bit was spot on though
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 09:51
|
#1616
|
Oh Lanky Lanky.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,038
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
The big headed git bit was spot on though 
|
Cannot argue with that, possibly more thick headed than big headed though.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 11:53
|
#1617
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Huntingdon, Cambs
Age: 59
Services: SKY HD+, BT BB
Posts: 586
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
l have seen better players than him on a cold Sunday morning playing at Warren Farm.
|
....assuming the Warren Farm you refer to isn't on the outskirts of Rio De Janeiro then I think you might be exagerating a tad there Arthur
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 22:20
|
#1618
|
Oh Lanky Lanky.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,038
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
After tonights results I suppose it is to late to arrange for Man Utd to play in all white tomorrow.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 22:26
|
#1619
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Gomez was at fault tonight, and he is supposed to be a top goalkeeper, on tonights performance, don't make me laugh. and Crouch should never have been on the pitch.
For the next game we have, to have Cudicini in goal and Pav on, get rid of Crouch.
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 23:00
|
#1620
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,719
|
Re: Football Season 2010/2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Gomez was at fault tonight, and he is supposed to be a top goalkeeper, on tonights performance, don't make me laugh. and Crouch should never have been on the pitch.
For the next game we have, to have Cudicini in goal and Pav on, get rid of Crouch.
|
Nope. Not his fault. Real Madrid were simply much better, especially in the second half. Not much Spurs could have done and they would have lost with 11 men on the pitch in all likelihood.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19.
|