01-04-2006, 00:50
|
#136
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 34
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stuart C
You've never dealt with Plusnet, Wanadoo or Bulldog then?
|
No, I was wise  .. starting to think not so wise going along with ntl but ah
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 01:11
|
#137
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 62
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
i will try all of the above times if i can ,i work afternoons .am curious about the results.mine doesn`t seem to be that bad ,some of yours speeds are pitiful as you probably know ,will start sun/mon .did you use the sites own speed test?
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:18
|
#138
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
good god ntl do something I am getting 1 20th of my max speed gone 1am.
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:15:52 UTC (hour slow)
1st 512K took 4531 ms = 113 KB/sec, approx 931 Kbps, 0.91 Mbps
2nd 512K took 5766 ms = 88.8 KB/sec, approx 732 Kbps, 0.71 Mbps
3rd 512K took 5047 ms = 101.4 KB/sec, approx 836 Kbps, 0.82 Mbps
4th 512K took 7093 ms = 72.2 KB/sec, approx 595 Kbps, 0.58 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 774 Kbps, 0.76 Mbps
ftp crawling along here.
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:19
|
#139
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 2,004
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:19:18 UTC
1st 128K took 109 ms = 1202495 Bytes/sec = approx 10005 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 110 ms = 1191564 Bytes/sec = approx 9914 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 109 ms = 1202495 Bytes/sec = approx 10005 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 109 ms = 1202495 Bytes/sec = approx 10005 kbits/sec
/pats ntl modem
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:20
|
#140
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 86.13.36.1
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=248ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=228ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=255
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:27
|
#141
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 2,004
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
Looks like you need traffic shaping, from across the network I get better
Pinging 86.13.36.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=248
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=248
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=248
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=248
Ping statistics for 86.13.36.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 16ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert 86.13.36.1
Tracing route to cpc3-leic8-0-0-gw.leic.cable.ntl.com [86.13.36.1]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.153.175.254
3 58 ms 10 ms 10 ms nott-t2cam1-a-v129.inet.ntl.com [80.4.47.165]
4 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms nott-t2core-a-ge-wan72.inet.ntl.com [80.1.79.61]
5 27 ms 47 ms 11 ms lee-bb-a-so-200-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.33]
6 24 ms 20 ms 14 ms leic-t2core-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.
109]
7 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms leic-t2cam1-a-ge-wan31.inet.ntl.com [82.3.33.5]
8 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms cpc3-leic8-0-0-gw.leic.cable.ntl.com [86.13.36.1
]
Trace complete.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:45
|
#142
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 62
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
1st 512K took 516 ms = 992.2 KB/sec, approx 8176 Kbps, 7.98 Mbps
2nd 512K took 703 ms = 728.3 KB/sec, approx 6001 Kbps, 5.86 Mbps
3rd 512K took 515 ms = 994.2 KB/sec, approx 8192 Kbps, 8 Mbps
4th 512K took 625 ms = 819.2 KB/sec, approx 6750 Kbps, 6.59 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 7280 Kbps, 7.11 Mbps
01 35 gmt
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 02:55
|
#143
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
jtwn yeah, seriously its never been this bad before, at 1am I am usually hovering around 3-5mbit by 1am and friday nights are usually the best night of the week so would be higher. I got a sudden drop on an already below par connection and flipped.
---------- Post added at 01:55 ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 ----------
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 86.13.36.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:55:05 UTC
1st 512K took 1141 ms = 448.7 KB/sec, approx 3697 Kbps, 3.61 Mbps
2nd 512K took 906 ms = 565.1 KB/sec, approx 4656 Kbps, 4.55 Mbps
3rd 512K took 735 ms = 696.6 KB/sec, approx 5740 Kbps, 5.61 Mbps
4th 512K took 578 ms = 885.8 KB/sec, approx 7299 Kbps, 7.13 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 5348 Kbps, 5.23 Mbps
now its better
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 15:35
|
#144
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
well if my last 24hrs are anything to go by looks like I just had another hit in performance its as if they just moved some more customers to my ubr.
a download from 2am to 6am failed to hit max speed at all and it appears their was some sort of contention throughout. I also did a speedtest at just after midday today and was under 3mbit.
So it now may be possible that if this level stays I will have no bursting to 10mbit at all and have more then half the day below 3mbit. That must be quite some overselling or a bad unoticed fault.
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 22:05
|
#145
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,638
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
I'd like to suggest you ring technical support but I'd suspect that to be pointless.
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 22:24
|
#146
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
|
Re: 10 meg unlimited?
I last spoke to them yesterday and yes you right it would be pointless, things are happening in april and everyone I have spoken to who has given me useful information is either unoffical contact or from retentions. Customer services and tech support have both fodged me off.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:06.
|