Gay couple claim they were ejected from pub for kissing

What about a man who has had a vasectomy - is it against nature for him to have sex, as he cannot reproduce?

Originally Posted by Hugh

What about a man who has had a vasectomy - is it against nature for him to have sex, as he cannot reproduce?

A Catholic would think so

every sperm is sacred every sperm is good .... lol

[danielf]

Has someone opened the can of worms that heterosexual anal sex is yet?

[Welshchris]

Originally Posted by PeteLockwood

i think there is a big difference.

homosexuality is against nature.. the purpose of sex is to reproduce. two men or two women can not do that, they must respect the rights of those that do not wish to see such actions

u dont half talk a not of billhocks.

Who is to say what is against nature? Homosexuality exists in all forms of life on earth and has been obsurved in a lot of the animal kingdom. Are u telling me that they to should stop because its against "Nature"? At the end of the day its a natural urge to be attracted to someone else and again no one has the right what so ever to say who that other person should be wheather it be same or opposite sex. The same could be said if u wanted to get down to it that some parts of the human population shouldnt reproduce with others because their genes are not good enough like the nazi regime.

How would u like it if someone came up to u and said that u shouldnt be with ur wife because she looks like Vannessa Feltz's cellulite?

U have the same right to be with whoever ur attracted to in the same way we have the rights as gay\Lesbian\Bisexual\Transgender\Transexuals do.

Simple as and its the way it should be.

Originally Posted by danielf

Has someone opened the can of worms that heterosexual anal sex is yet?

ive mentioned that I partake lol lol

Or BJ's.......

Originally Posted by Welshchris

u dont half talk a not of billhocks.

Who is to say what is against nature? Homosexuality exists in all forms of life on earth and has been obsurved in a lot of the animal kingdom. Are u telling me that they to should stop because its against "Nature"? At the end of the day its a natural urge to be attracted to someone else and again no one has the right what so ever to say who that other person should be wheather it be same or opposite sex. The same could be said if u wanted to get down to it that some parts of the human population shouldnt reproduce with others because their genes are not good enough like the nazi regime.

How would u like it if someone came up to u and said that u shouldnt be with ur wife because she looks like Vannessa Feltz's cellulite?

U have the same right to be with whoever ur attracted to in the same way we have the rights as gay\Lesbian\Bisexual\Transgender\Transexuals do.

Simple as and its the way it should be.

have to pull you up on that mate a peodo thinks its a natural urge now thats not ok is it

---------- Post added at 23:12 ---------- Previous post was at 23:12 ----------

Originally Posted by Hugh

Or BJ's.......

been found to increase the risk of oral cancers as is cunnilingus

Synthetic antibiotics - against nature, I tell you....

[Welshchris]

Originally Posted by Zing

A Catholic would think so

every sperm is sacred every sperm is good .... lol

this is what i dont get.

Catholics dont approve of Any forms of sex which u cannot reproduce or any sort of sexual protection such as condoms YET they have reciently changed their look on Condoms even though its so called against their religion.

Why? because it suits them, even though my God Daughter is a Catholic and i have Catholic friends, Catholisism i cannot stand because they always change their religion and outlook to suit them and the way they look on life.

I remember my friend lost 2 out of 3 of her tripplets. During the funeral the Catholic Priest said to her "Dont feel bad about it, It was just Gods will". I had to be restrained cos i almost headbutted him.

---------- Post added at 23:18 ---------- Previous post was at 23:16 ----------

Originally Posted by Zing

have to pull you up on that mate a peodo thinks its a natural urge now thats not ok is it[COLOR="Silver"]

In a way it is but how dare u put a contrast between Paedos and Gay People?

Gay people have sex between 2 adults which is consentual, where paedos pray on the innocent that hasnt got any clue because they are to young to understand what is going on.

I really cant believe that u would try and put a contrast between Gays and Paedos what the hell are u thinking ffs?

Originally Posted by Welshchris

this is what i dont get.

Catholics dont approve of Any forms of sex which u cannot reproduce or any sort of sexual protection such as condoms YET they have reciently changed their look on Condoms even though its so called against their religion.

Why? because it suits them, even though my God Daughter is a Catholic and i have Catholic friends, Catholisism i cannot stand because they always change their religion and outlook to suit them and the way they look on life.

I remember my friend lost 2 out of 3 of her tripplets. During the funeral the Catholic Priest said to her "Dont feel bad about it, It was just Gods will". I had to be restrained cos i almost headbutted him.

---------- Post added at 23:18 ---------- Previous post was at 23:16 ----------

A lot of the concepts the Catholics follow date back to the Borgias interestingly there is a new series about them which is interested. Up untill them preists were allowed families

I was not putting a contrast between peodos and gay people I was simply answering what you said about peoples rights to judge etc

[Welshchris]

and what im saying is u cannot put a contrast between Judging something which happens between 2 Concenting Adults and something which is quite often rape.

Originally Posted by Welshchris

and what im saying is u cannot put a contrast between Judging something which happens between 2 Concenting Adults and something which is quite often rape.

I am sorry you saw my reply that way but you made a sweeping statement that was not correct. There are times when we have the right to judge who someone is attracted to or how people act. Not all urges are natural either. How about bestiality? thats an adult and maybe a sheep not natural and perfectly ok for us to judge the urge as wrong. Necrophillia is another...

[Welshchris]

Again how can u put a contrast between Gays and Bestiality or Necrophillia?

as ive already stated Gays = 2 CONSENTING ADULTS as in had permission to perform sexual acts.

Ur hardly going to get consent to perform the acts from a Horse, sheep dog or even a dead body are u?

Originally Posted by Welshchris

Again how can u put a contrast between Gays and Bestiality or Necrophillia?

as ive already stated Gays = 2 CONSENTING ADULTS as in had permission to perform sexual acts.

Ur hardly going to get consent to perform the acts from a Horse, sheep dog or even a dead body are u?

Again I tell you I am not putting a contrast I am simply saying not all urges are natural and its ok to judge sometimes

Dogs by their very nature like to please their owners

[Welshchris]

and what im saying is u have to be careful how u judge and when u do u have to take into account the situation and who or what is involved.