 |
|
Cable Forum
> Computers & IT
> Internet Discussion
|
340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
|
|
|
340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
16-07-2006, 10:37
|
#1
|
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 74
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,378
|
340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...270472,00.html
Quote:
When the internet was developed in the 1980s, programmers had no idea how big it would become. They gave each address a †œ16-bitââ‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ number, which meant that the total number of available addresses worked out at about four billion (2 to the power of 32).
But as use grew, it became clear that the old protocol, IPv4, wasnââ‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t big enough, so a new one was written based on †œ32-bit numbersââ‚à ‚¬Ã‚ÂÂ. That increased the number of available addresses to 340 undecillion, 282 decillion, 366 nonillion, 920 octillion, 938 septillion ††enough for the foreseeable future, Mr Kessens said.
|
Well we can all breath a sigh of relief then. 
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
|
16-07-2006, 10:41
|
#2
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,737
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
Until Google claims them all in a week.
|
|
|
|
|
16-07-2006, 10:42
|
#3
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,182
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
All the Cable Forum-wannabe sites need to be registered somewhere  
__________________
Heavy Is The Crown
|
|
|
|
|
16-07-2006, 21:50
|
#4
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: Zen & YouFibre FTTP, Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 31,334
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
IPv6 - been around a long time now, I did a course on it in 2002.
Not all the theorectical addresses will actually be used (just the same as the current IPv4).
__________________
 Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
|
|
16-07-2006, 21:59
|
#5
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London way
Age: 50
Services: Sarcasm
Posts: 8,376
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
Now if I could get even .1% of that business in domain names.... 
|
|
|
|
|
16-07-2006, 22:35
|
#6
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 51
Posts: 7,101
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul M
IPv6 - been around a long time now, I did a course on it in 2002.
|
Yeah, that's what I thought... the Times article says it's a new protocol, guess their definition of new ain't exactly the same as mine and yours
|
|
|
|
|
18-07-2006, 10:29
|
#7
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
Does this mean it will be even more difficult to "catch" spammers?
About 100 nonillion times more difficult, if my maths is correct.
My calculator just broke...
|
|
|
|
|
22-07-2006, 09:49
|
#8
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,395
|
Re: 340,282,366,920,938,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00 0 new web addresses
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TimesOnline
They gave each address a †œ16-bitââ‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ number, which meant that the total number of available addresses worked out at about four billion (2 to the power of 32).
|
Bad article from the times there, IPv4 uses 32-bit addresses, IPv6 uses 128-bit addresses.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:59.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
