Connection sharing dilema
15-05-2005, 22:57
|
#1
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
Connection sharing dilema
Hello everyone,
I need a connection sharing software that can do the following:
- network address translation (NAT)
- filter clients based on the MAC address (phisical address)
- good monitoring
The most suitable I could find is Kerio Winroute Firewall but it allows acces to the internet based on a IP address rule.....
Thank you for your attention!
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:08
|
#2
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 375
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
I think sygate Home network might do it. Why would any one want to filter by IP address? Sounds rather pointless. As there are usualy only 255 different IP addresses in the standard home ranges, it would take no time to break. Odd indeed.
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:14
|
#3
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
can't answer you but  to the site
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by carlosnino
Hello everyone,
I need a connection sharing software that can do the following:
- network address translation (NAT)
- filter clients based on the MAC address (phisical address)
- good monitoring
The most suitable I could find is Kerio Winroute Firewall but it filters only by IP address.....
Thank you for your attention!
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:17
|
#4
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,754
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bdav
I think sygate Home network might do it. Why would any one want to filter by IP address? Sounds rather pointless. As there are usualy only 255 different IP addresses in the standard home ranges, it would take no time to break. Odd indeed.
|
Kerio isn't a home product ......
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:18
|
#5
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bdav
I think sygate Home network might do it.
|
Other oppinions?
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:20
|
#6
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,754
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Is there any reason you need software as opposed to hardware ? - most routers could do this.
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:27
|
#7
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul M
Is there any reason you need software as opposed to hardware ? - most routers could do this.
|
Money.
I have 2 computers and I think it's cheaper to buy a software and turn one in a router.
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:32
|
#8
|
|
cf.mega poser
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by carlosnino
Money.
I have 2 computers and I think it's cheaper to buy a software and turn one in a router than to buy the router.
|
You can get a router for around £30 these days...
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
|
|
|
15-05-2005, 23:38
|
#9
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
Still no solid answer for my software question.... 
I understand that the hardware solution is the best, but I'm curios, what software choices would there be?
|
|
|
16-05-2005, 00:02
|
#10
|
|
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Poole, Dorset
Age: 41
Services: FreeSat+
Tivo
V-Box
VM 60MBit
Posts: 13,365
|
Re: Connection sharing dilema
A non-software choice. LoL. A Linux box could do this with a few scripts, it's just having the knowledge and ability to set it up
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44.
|