Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain

[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by foreverwar

Rammy, you appear to be a little confused - I posted this, with a link to the clip, less than two hours after your OP.

He hoped there would be 20 Muslim MPs, God willing, and that within 30 years there would be a Muslim PM, God willing - he never stated that the all the MPs would be Muslim, God willing or the entire government (which he never said) would be Muslim, God willing; I think you are interpreting this in your own special way.

he stated that the whole parliment and the PM would be muslim

His "game-plan", according your post #50, also includes
"# Voted strongly for introducing ID cards. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for Labour's anti-terrorism laws. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly against an investigation into the Iraq war. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for replacing Trident. votes, speeches
# Voted for equal gay rights. votes, speeches"
Very anti-democratic, huh?

I know. I posted exactly the above myself, and commented on that a few pages ago, why are you reposting it and saying what I actually said back at me?

btw, you are very quick to point any slight discrepancies in posts that disagree with the information in the OP from the BNP site, but seem less keen to highlight the inaccuracies in the information in the OP from the BNP site, to wit -
a) Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain - which at no time in the 7 odd minutes of the speech was this called for.

I already stated that I believe the thread title to be an error on my part. Several pages back.....

b) The video speech in which Mr Malik made his remarks has now been released on the internet — nearly five months after the event. The suppression of the video was clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and Labour elite - when in fact it was on the organisations website, and has been on YouTube for over three months, along with other videos from the conference.

I really don't care when it was released. I care about what is being said in it by a MP in a western democracies govt.

Your attitude appears to be "no matter what the evidence, he is guilty"

But the evidence suggests that he is hankering after a muslim parliment and PM. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

---------- Post added at 16:00 ---------- Previous post was at 15:57 ----------

Originally Posted by Maggy J

With all due respect this is still a democracy and provided he does not incite violence or promote intolerance or support terrorism then he is free to speak his opinion.

I'm not saying that he isn't free to voice his opinion (he is), I'm concerned that he is a MP in our govt holding such an opinion.....

---------- Post added at 16:02 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ----------

Originally Posted by Sir John Luke

As far as I am aware, Hitler rose to power on a wave of nationalism and prejudice against people of a certain religion, stoked up by an extreme right-wing party. Ring any bells?

But it's the complacency of people that probably helped him get to a position where he could sieze power....
(That, and the night of the long knives of course )

Originally Posted by Ramrod

----------

I'm not saying that he isn't free to voice his opinion (he is), I'm concerned that he is a MP in our govt holding such an opinion.....

He has a right as a citizen to hold those opinions and his status has little to do with his right to state that opinion provided he breaks no laws..However if the Labour party deems he has broken their rules that may be a different matter.

[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by Maggy J

He has a right as a citizen to hold those opinions and his status has little to do with his right to state that opinion provided he breaks no laws..However if the Labour party deems he has broken their rules that may be a different matter.

I agree entirely.

Simple question - what is wrong with having a Muslim Prime Minister in 30 years time?

btw, the exact quote from his speech was, just to make sure there is no "misunderstandings" -

"In 1997 we got our first Muslim MP
In 2001 we had two Muslim MPs
In 2005 we had four Muslim MPs
Inshallah, in 2009/10 we will have eight Muslim MPs
In 2014 we will have sixteen Muslim MPs
At this rate, the whole Parliament will be Muslim
(two second pause, smile)
But just to say, in case there are journalists here today, that is not my objective (smiling)"

Originally Posted by foreverwar

Simple question - what is wrong with having a Muslim Prime Minister in 30 years time?

btw, the exact quote from his speech was, just to make sure there is no "misunderstandings" -

"In 1997 we got our first Muslim MP
In 2001 we had two Muslim MPs
In 2005 we had four Muslim MPs
Inshallah, in 2009/10 we will have eight Muslim MPs
In 2014 we will have sixteen Muslim MPs
At this rate, the whole Parliament will be Muslim
(two second pause, smile)
But just to say, in case there are journalists here today, that is not my objective (smiling)"

And the lesson we should learn from this is to check carefully the BNP version of any story and find any info that either supports it or any that shows that they have completely muddied the waters..

Originally Posted by Maggy J

And the lesson we should learn from this is to check carefully the BNP version of any story and find any info that either supports it or any that shows that they have completely muddied the waters..

Duh!

[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by foreverwar

Simple question - what is wrong with having a Muslim Prime Minister in 30 years time?

Normally, I wouldn't care about the religion of our prime minister but islam is a special case. Muslims seem incapable of seperating their religion from law/government/everyday life. This is apparent from many (?all) countries that are currently governed by muslims.

---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------

Originally Posted by Maggy J

And the lesson we should learn from this is to check carefully the BNP version of any story and find any info that either supports it or any that shows that they have completely muddied the waters..

Thats what I asked for help with in the first few posts

---------- Post added at 17:56 ---------- Previous post was at 17:36 ----------

Hmmm......I have looked and looked at that vid. I think that I am probably overreacting to what he said. You lot have pretty much convinced me that it's not as bad/worrying/sinister as I have been thinking.
I still stand by my assertion that a MP in a western democracy shouldn't be calling for a muslim PM. As islam appears to 'be' atm, this would be incompatable with our way of life. It's bad enough mixing christianity into our govt decisions....
'god told me to do it' etc...

WHAT POINTS ???? all you have done is seen an edited bnp piece of rubbish and your making a big fuss about it what is there to address. If your asking me if i am bothered if in thirty years time there is a muslim pm the answer is no i am not as that pm like all others will have been democratically elected and will be removed the same way if they don't do things the country likes. You seem to want to ban muslims from any position of power how can i address stupidity on that level. Seriously if this is how you react to a blatant piece of editing your in for a very stressful life and i have no intention in joining you in that way i have far more other important things to worry about then rubbish like this your welcome to get as hot and bothered as you like.

[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by RizzyKing

WHAT POINTS ???? all you have done is seen an edited bnp piece of rubbish

Well then you haven't looked at the thread properly, have you?

[Mr Angry]

Originally Posted by RizzyKing

... as that pm like all others will have been democratically elected and will be removed the same way if they don't do things the country likes.

Rizzy, I take it you missed the "Brown memo"?

[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by Mr Angry

Rizzy, I take it you missed the "Brown memo"?

What is that?