Neo-Nazi Teenagers - Page 4

Pierre · 27-10-2005, 11:35

What I want to know is, if they're the master race - why is she wearing braces????

Ramrod · 27-10-2005, 11:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by clarie

But in this case it has been.

Agreed

Quote:

If you want to preserve your race in the context these girls do, that means not mixing together different nationalities and cultures

Well if they don't want to mix I don't see why anyone should force them to....

Quote:

and not 'cross-breeding' as it were. This is what I disagree with.

That comes under seeing nothing wrong with preserving racial (and genetic) purity.

Nugget · 27-10-2005, 11:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre

What I want to know is, if they're the master race - why is she wearing braces????

Just because she's part of the master race, doesn't mean that she isn't a snaggletooth!

Ramrod · 27-10-2005, 11:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre

What I want to know is, if they're the master race - why is she wearing braces????

'cos their not the master race, they just think they are

clarie · 27-10-2005, 12:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

Well if they don't want to mix I don't see why anyone should force them to....

Nor do I but the problem is if you have a city with a population of 250 000, not everyone is going to think the same way. Therefore you cannot cater for all of the people who do not want to mix.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

That comes under seeing nothing wrong with preserving racial (and genetic) purity

They do not have to indulge in mixed races relationships themselves, but it is when they revolt against others doing so that it becomes an issue.

Ramrod · 27-10-2005, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by clarie

Nor do I but the problem is if you have a city with a population of 250 000, not everyone is going to think the same way. Therefore you cannot cater for all of the people who do not want to mix.

But if you 'cater' for those who do then you should 'cater' for those who don't.....

Quote:

They do not have to indulge in mixed races relationships themselves, but it is when they revolt against others doing so that it becomes an issue.

Are they 'revolting' against it? I thought they were merely spouting cr*p.

Nugget · 27-10-2005, 14:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

But if you 'cater' for those who do then you should 'cater' for those who don't.....

Are they 'revolting' against it? I thought they were merely spouting off cr*p.

Well, I think it's pretty revolting ...

Ramrod · 27-10-2005, 14:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget

Well, I think it's pretty revolting ...

I was waiting for that one!

Nugget · 27-10-2005, 14:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

I was waiting for that one!

I wasn't going to let that one get away

clarie · 27-10-2005, 14:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

But if you 'cater' for those who do then you should 'cater' for those who don't.....

How could you do that? Ask around, say in an American city, are you willing to allow Nigerians into your city? How can you then cater for those who say no? The only way would be to separate the city into those that do and those that don't and just imagine the nightmare that would be...

Ramrod · 27-10-2005, 14:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by clarie

How could you do that? Ask around, say in an American city, are you willing to allow Nigerians into your city? How can you then cater for those who say no? The only way would be to separate the city into those that do and those that don't and just imagine the nightmare that would be...

Sorry, I thought we were talking about intermarrying.....not simply living side by side.

Xaccers · 27-10-2005, 14:59

Would people also object to Stalin or USSR T-Shirts?

Kliro · 27-10-2005, 16:23

A little bit off topic but - someone told me the other day that the NRA (National Rifle Association) was founded two years after the KKK ended, he seemed to think the two were closely interlinked.

Anyone know anything about that.

(btw - are they allowed to sing stuff like that? I know America has freedom of speech, but could it be classed as incitement?)

27-10-2005, 17:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kliro

A little bit off topic but - someone told me the other day that the NRA (National Rifle Association) was founded two years after the KKK ended, he seemed to think the two were closely interlinked.

Anyone know anything about that.

(btw - are they allowed to sing stuff like that? I know America has freedom of speech, but could it be classed as incitement?)

I formed an opinion a while ago I wonder if thats interlinked

punky · 27-10-2005, 17:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kliro

A little bit off topic but - someone told me the other day that the NRA (National Rifle Association) was founded two years after the KKK ended, he seemed to think the two were closely interlinked.

Anyone know anything about that.

As with everything else he puts in, it is heavily distorted.

Quote:

Fact: The NRA was founded in 1871 -- by act of the New York Legislature, at request of former Union officers. The Klan was founded in 1866, and quickly became a terrorist organization.

Fact: The Klan Act and Enforcement Act were signed into law by President Ulysess S. Grant. Grant used their provisions vigorously, suspending habeas corpus and deploying troops; under his leadership over 5,000 arrests were made and the Klan was dealt a serious (if all too short-lived) blow.

Fact: Grant's vigor in disrupting the Klan earned him unpopularity among many whites, but Frederick Douglass praised him, and an associate of Douglass wrote that African-Americans "will ever cherish a grateful remembrance of his name, fame and great services."

Fact: After Grant left the White House, the NRA elected him as its eighth president.

Fact: After Grant's term, the NRA elected General Philip Sheridan, who had removed the governors of Texas and Lousiana for failure to suppress the KKK.

Fact: The affinity of NRA for enemies of the Klan is hardly surprising. The NRA was founded by former Union officers, and eight of its first ten presidents were Union veterans.

Fact: During the 1950s and 1960s, groups of blacks organized as NRA chapters in order to obtain surplus military rifles to fight off Klansmen.

http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html

But of course, the NRA is just an extension of the KKK isn't it... Hmmm. The NRA has many black members, including James Earl Jones. So basically, no the NRA isn't racist, and it has nothing in common, in relation, or at all to do with the KKK.

Quote:

(btw - are they allowed to sing stuff like that? I know America has freedom of speech, but could it be classed as incitement?)

Good question. I don't think they do have laws like incitement. The first amendment (which defines that laws against free speech are unconstitutional, and therefore illegal), is taken very seriously by many Americans, which formed the basis of the birth of their country from British rule/oppression. Pity Michael Moore doesn't.
__________________

Oh, and if you want something a bit more current: Until 2003, Charlton Heston was president of the NRA. He was a personal friend of Dr Martin Luther King, no less, and campaigned with him during the Black civil right's struggle in the 1960s. But according to Michael Moore he is actually a fanatical racist. Hmmm.