04-02-2013, 23:49
|
#46
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,300
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
What sort of stuff?
|
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 23:51
|
#47
|
|
cf.mega poser
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
The stuff they forgot when they closed her up?
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 00:04
|
#48
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2004
Services: VM 50Mb
Posts: 1,665
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Oh wow, one of the questions on the BBC news report:
"Why did they bury him under a car park?"
But the reply from another user, was pretty darned funny:
"It was very common in Richard's time for losers in Battle to be buried in Car parks
Dont forget cars were a symbol of power in those days"
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 00:42
|
#49
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
So he didn't have a hunch and his arms were normal although effeminate so that blows the Tudor accounts and with how he was thought of in York I believe in stronger than before that he did not kill the princes . Very interesting documentary
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 01:22
|
#50
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England Uk
Services: Telewest Phone
Telewest BroadBand
Telewest Digital Tv
v+ HD
Posts: 4,089
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
What sort of stuff?
|
I was Thinking if his rings and Orther Jewley but now I reckon they would had stolen them
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 01:51
|
#51
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on holiday by mistake
Age: 56
Services: Vivid 200, Full House, V6 x2
Posts: 5,977
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Judging by the number of Honda adverts during the documentary it's hardly a surprise he was buried in a car park.
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 12:10
|
#52
|
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 73
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,365
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwe
I was Thinking if his rings and Orther Jewley but now I reckon they would had stolen them
|
Yep.After all, if they nicked his clothes and left his bling they would be pretty stupid. 
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 15:49
|
#53
|
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,678
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 17:03
|
#54
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Open Prison, H.M.United Kingdom
Posts: 1,037
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Initially, the skeleton was believed to be that of a leading politician, but this has since been ruled out after they found a spine.
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 17:12
|
#55
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Coventry
Posts: 1,003
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
No the spine was bent so it still could be a politician !
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 18:54
|
#56
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Services: ClearFibre Internet, Vodafone mobile Google Pixel 4
Posts: 9,699
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
A spat has broken out over where he should be buried:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-21336248
Personally, I think York...
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 18:57
|
#57
|
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,300
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
I also think he should be re-interred in York, preferably under the choir within the Minster. I suspect the licence to dig up bones, which placed a deadline on re-interrment and specified as near to the original site as possible, was written out by some lackadaisical civil servant who didn't expect them to find anything of significance.
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 19:02
|
#58
|
|
cf.mega poser
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
I think Madam Tussauds seems appropriate.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 19:02
|
#59
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobbydaler
|
I agree he was loved in York and afterall he was only buried in Leicester he did not die there otherwise I would say bury him at Bosworth
|
|
|
|
|
05-02-2013, 20:37
|
#60
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: cambridgeshire
Age: 44
Services: Virgin VIP package,
FREEVIEW
Posts: 466
|
Re: Richard III discovered?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tizmeinnit
I agree he was loved in York and afterall he was only buried in Leicester he did not die there otherwise I would say bury him at Bosworth
|
I disagree. he wasn't from York, his family wasn't from York, He simply held a (even in his time) ancient title from York.
He was born and spend most of his childhood in his ancestral home in Northamptonshire (the city at the time now tiny village of Fotheringhay). Which also is where most of his family are burred. IMO that would bee the most fitting place for burial (either that or Westminster abbey along with most past Kings of England).
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
