[Merged] Manchester Proxies. - Page 12

th'engineer · 20-03-2004, 20:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntl customer

Perhaps the transparent proxies have become more ... er ... transparent

heres the answer

cache9-mant.server.ntli.net (62.252.192.12)
62.252.192.0 - 62.252.223.255
NTL Internet
Manchester site

Florence · 20-03-2004, 20:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

As BBking said we tend not to go through or stick to one proxy. So far I have seen that I have been through cache10-mant.server.ntli.net and cache6-mant.server.ntli.net.

Weird I have the same one I have had since I first found out I was on proxies again even have a screen shot showing the ip number which didn't change even though I have been swapping cable modems around these last few weeks..

I am also getting DOS attacks from my my proxy according to the modem as its sent me emails saying I was under attack from the ip that is cache1.. The only one I have ever been on.....

**Paul** · 20-03-2004, 20:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by th'engineer

heres the answer

cache9-mant.server.ntli.net (62.252.192.12)
62.252.192.0 - 62.252.223.255
NTL Internet
Manchester site

Erm - how is looking up the IP range for Manchester the answer to anything

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kitty

I am also getting DOS attacks from my my proxy according to the modem as its sent me emails saying I was under attack from the ip that is cache1.. The only one I have ever been on.....

Ignore them Kitty - it is just being over sensitive - I get them a few times a week - it is mis-interpreting real traffic.

freeair · 20-03-2004, 21:30

Well what a revelation this thread is

, I thought the proxies had been buried for ever, at least now I know why browsing has been hit and miss the last couple of days.

BBKing.
To help in your request for backing when you say there are problems I have just spoken to BB tech support to advise that I am having problems with intermittent outages.
Unfortunately I didn't get the guys name but 5 starts to him, very pleasant and helpful and none of the usual c**p about resetting the STB and PC.

If the top managers were forced to spend a month on front line support maybe NTL would fix things properly, or maybe they would just give up.
I feel sorry for TeleWest customers when the long standing rumours come to fruition.

Hope the proxies get fixed, or switched off again real soon.

iadom · 20-03-2004, 21:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kitty

Wonders why you have the best proxy care to share the IP number so we can all have a decent one then

62.252.192.12 is the only one I seem to be going through since they came back on, TBH I have had no real problems and noticed no degradation of service whatsoever.

AllNettools did show it at first but for some reason it now cannot detect it.

Florence · 20-03-2004, 22:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom

62.252.192.12 is the only one I seem to be going through since they came back on, TBH I have had no real problems and noticed no degradation of service whatsoever.

AllNettools did show it at first but for some reason it now cannot detect it.

AllNettools can still detect my proxy might try yours

th'engineer · 20-03-2004, 22:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by pem

Erm - how is looking up the IP range for Manchester the answer to anything

It shows its a cache

20-03-2004, 23:09

I think i should be upset

I have not had any of the problems you all say your having. Why have i been left out its not fair :pp

I am on the south manchester cache here in warrington

**Paul** · 20-03-2004, 23:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by th'engineer

It shows its a cache

Oh, ok, but then I had already said it was.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pem

AllnetTools is faulty then, that is the IP of Manchester Cache 9

Chrysalis · 21-03-2004, 00:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by pem

Out of interest - what NTL proxy does this page show for you (when not using your own) ?

REMOTE_ADDR 62.254.0.38

Chrysalis · 21-03-2004, 00:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kitty

I managed to get it up but it took 4 mins on a 1 mb service... has to be the proxies...........

LMFAO

sorry had to laugh

but seriously you dont pay for a 1mbit connection for sub 56k performance

**Paul** · 21-03-2004, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

REMOTE_ADDR 62.254.0.38

So you are using exactly the same as the rest of us in Nottingham & surrounding areas - and they have been stable here for the last few months - very few problems.

Chrysalis · 21-03-2004, 01:07

pem you are saying these proxies have been on for last few months, this is simply not true for me, I maybe using the proxy servers in nottingham but I am not in nottingham so its quite easy my area was turned off, also I can repeat the proxy problems again and again and again. One click to turn of my proxy problem exists, another click to bypass ntl poroxy problem gone, its quite simple really one common factor in my problems and its the ntl trapserent proxy.

Tell me what you make of my report in the speedtest thread next to this, I posted the results.

Chrysalis · 21-03-2004, 01:10

Tracing route to cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 15 ms 15 ms 19 ms 10.146.151.254
2 70 ms 19 ms 19 ms leic-t2cam1-b-ge96.inet.ntl.com [80.7.30.145]
3 20 ms 19 ms 39 ms nott-t2core-b-ge-wan63.inet.ntl.com [80.1.79.197
]
4 110 ms 128 ms 130 ms cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38]

Trace complete

Nikko · 21-03-2004, 01:24

It would seem the problem is with your UBR/gateway - is that a Shepshed area connection? Certainly my routeing seems cleaner:

Tracing route to cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 9 ms 13 ms 9 ms 10.145.***.***
3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms nott-t2cam1-b-ge-wan53-137.inet.ntl.com [80.4.46
.193]
4 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms nott-t2core-b-ge-wan72.inet.ntl.com [80.1.79.189
]
5 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms cache9-nott.server.ntli.net [62.254.0.38]

Trace complete.