08-09-2005, 20:56
|
#16
|
|
Guest
|
Re: tons and tonnes
if you take 1lb = 0.454kg
then 2240*0.454=1016.96
|
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 20:57
|
#17
|
|
Guest
Location: Sale, Cheshire
Services: 10MB Broadband, DTV, Telephone
Posts: n/a
|
Re: tons and tonnes
<pedant>
rounded up = 1016.05
rounded down = 1016.04
rounded off = 1016.05
</pedant>
|
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 20:57
|
#18
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 4,988
|
Re: tons and tonnes
What's all this about then?
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 20:59
|
#19
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bolton
Age: 57
Services: non
wife took control
Posts: 5,425
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Caspar
What's all this about then?
|
boredom and taxing the brain
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:02
|
#20
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JohnHorb
According to google - 1016.00
...or then again, elsewhere - 1016.047
|
According to BS 350 (admittedly the ancient 1962 edition), 1 lb = 453.59237 g.
Therefore the long ton of 2240 pounds = 1016.0469088 kg, which is better than to the nearest mg.
Is this close enough?
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:03
|
#21
|
|
Guest
Location: Sale, Cheshire
Services: 10MB Broadband, DTV, Telephone
Posts: n/a
|
Re: tons and tonnes
To get really pedantic, taking 1 pound = 0.45359237 kg
2240lb = 1016.0469088 kg
(bet you wish you'd never started this, Marky  )
[Edit] Damn, beaten to it!
|
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:07
|
#22
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bolton
Age: 57
Services: non
wife took control
Posts: 5,425
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theodoric
According to BS 350 (admittedly the ancient 1962 edition), 1 lb = 453.59237 g.
Therefore the long ton of 2240 pounds = 1016.0469088 kg, which is better than to the nearest mg.
Is this close enough? 
|
cool i'll weigh in the old water tank knowing that i'm not going to be ripped of for .008 af a kilo
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:07
|
#23
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JohnHorb
To get really pedantic, taking 1 pound = 0.45359237 kg
2240lb = 1016.0469088 kg
(bet you wish you'd never started this, Marky  )
[Edit] Damn, beaten to it!
|
Actually, I suppose we ought to quote the conversion to the same number of sig figs, namely 8, which gives us a miserly 1016.0469 kg.
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:09
|
#24
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Whitworth
Age: 56
Services: Sky Q, Bt Infinity
Posts: 1,546
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Avoirdupois measure 1 gross ton = 1 long ton = 2240 pounds
1 net ton = 1 short ton = 2000 pounds
1 pound = 16 ounces = 7000 grains
1 ounce = 16 drachms = 437.5 grains
1 long ton = 20 hundredweight
1 hundredweight = 4 quarters = 112 pounds
1 quarter = 2 stone = 28 pounds
1 quintal = 100 pounds
Standard measure 1 tonne = 1 metric ton
1 tonne = 1000 kilograms
1 kilograms = 1000 grams
|
Now i have headache! I hate weights and measures!!
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:10
|
#25
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: tons and tonnes
And it has just struck me. Why is an Imperial to metric conversion considered as entertainment?
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:12
|
#26
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bolton
Age: 57
Services: non
wife took control
Posts: 5,425
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theodoric
And it has just struck me. Why is an Imperial to metric conversion considered as entertainment?
|
because its fun
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:19
|
#27
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by marky
because its fun 
|
Offhand, the only humorous unit that I can think of is the barn. This is 10^-24 sq cm, is used as a unit of cross section for nuclear reactions, and is so called because it is as big as a barn door for most nuclear reactions.
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:21
|
#28
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: bolton
Age: 57
Services: non
wife took control
Posts: 5,425
|
Re: tons and tonnes
but i find maths fun
i'm crap at english
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:24
|
#29
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: tons and tonnes
And I suppose that the latest metric prefixes, zepto and yocto, could be considered amusing. Somehow, I can't really take a yoctogramme very seriously.
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 21:26
|
#30
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Whitworth
Age: 56
Services: Sky Q, Bt Infinity
Posts: 1,546
|
Re: tons and tonnes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by marky
but i find maths fun
i'm crap at english 
|
Maths isn't fun!! English is a bit more fun!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:30.
|