{spam?} {definately spam?} {disarmed} - Page 2

greencreeper · 12-07-2005, 18:54

Or use The Bat! - similar to Outlook, only not written by MS. Feature rich and secure.

Not a fan of HTML email neither.

Stuart · 12-07-2005, 21:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingPhoenix

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C

Or use Thunderbird, which requires you to push a button to download any images in an email..

So Does Outlook 2003

But Thunderbird is free...

ntl customer · 12-07-2005, 23:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.j.fry

Bah, html mail should be outlawed

Why? I find that HTML email when used properly is better than plain text.

Easier to read on screen, easier to print and generally nicer to look at, and easier to stress points by using bold, underline etc.

KingPhoenix · 13-07-2005, 06:19

But its also easier to hide dodgy links, collectable information etc. into html mails too... Whilst i prefer html mails too, it does make it easier for spam etc...

philip.j.fry · 13-07-2005, 08:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntl customer

Easier to read on screen,

Not for the many people who use text only readers. I do use a mail reader that can handle html (Evolution) but do often check mail on my laptop and pda as well and they aren't capable of reading it.