Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chrysalis
defenition of faulty network?
core network failing or....
many poor performing ubr's how many? only ntl know
slow and unreliable email server's
unreliable proxy server's
and today ntl webserver down
I think the topic is justified.
|
Chrysalis, firstly a 's is applied to a word only to describe possession, IE this John's uBR sucks ass, and an extra s is only applied where the existing word doesn't end in an s. OR as a contraction of 'it is' - it's, and other contractions of 'xx is'
Pluralising a word doesn't require an apostrophe in front of the s.
Sorry to those not interested in that stuff, just reading crap punctuation and grammar does eventually get boring and is a testament to the **** poor standards of our schooling.
Poor performing uBRs, none, poor performing up/downstreams very few, yours is a huge exception requiring costly upgrades due to the **** poor quality of the original build.
Unreliable proxy servers, think most would say these are far far less common than they used to be and 99.x% of the time are now fine.
The webserver, how often has it been down exactly?
Email servers - have these not dramatically improved, recent events being an exception to this?
Core network - hardly falling apart, considerably less than 30% utilised, massively resilient using quality hardware, a superior network to BT's Colossus, not exactly a hunk of junk?
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kits
Thanks Igni I havent got a 8dB forward path attenuator it was remnoved years ago
|
Might be worth finding it, quite plausible that the network has been fixed and tuned and that's why you need it back! I was concerned at your power levels going lower at one point however the reason for that (which I'm not going into as it involves composite second order distortion and more predominately composite triple beats) has been resolved, as evidenced by your SNR increasing with increased power levels.