Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
19-08-2026, 22:57
|
#76
|
|
In the gang of three
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hiding . . from all the experts
Posts: 5,661
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Will they be paying tax, or is there a get out clause?
__________________
If knowledge is power, how come those in power seem so stupid?
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 06:09
|
#77
|
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 15,460
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
this'll upset little willy and princess needy. i expect we will see more doctored pictures from princess needy in an attempt to be more popular than megan
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 09:55
|
#78
|
|
Mum 30/09/20 Dad 08/08/24
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, A secret Moonbase (shh don't tell anybody)
Age: 57
Services: 2 x TiVo 360s, SH5. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, Ton's of Smart Home stuff, & Cuddy Toy
Posts: 17,379
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carth
Will they be paying tax, or is there a get out clause?
|
They'll pay a lot more tax than you.
__________________
I'm a Trustee for a local charity
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 10:31
|
#79
|
|
In the gang of three
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hiding . . from all the experts
Posts: 5,661
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hom3r
They'll pay a lot more tax than you.
|
I should hope so, seeing as I'm on state pension 
Do you think they're getting out of America before ICE agents come knocking? 
__________________
If knowledge is power, how come those in power seem so stupid?
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 11:10
|
#80
|
|
Woke and proud !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife
Posts: 10,236
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Can't see why someone moving house is headline news with everything else gping on in the world.
The whole 'royal' family are a costly irrelevance. We need Cromwell back.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 11:17
|
#81
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 36
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 16,774
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
oli oli oli, oi oi oi
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 12:18
|
#82
|
|
In the gang of three
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hiding . . from all the experts
Posts: 5,661
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
I guess all the 'chat shows' will be lining up to offer them a couple of quid (sarcasm) to appear and tell the world how marvelous things are now they're back in the UK . . . amongst friends and family 
oh and by the way, we have a NEW book out soon, along with personalised limited photo albums of the kids, and we will be opening a business selling cute jars of honey and tree bark face creams
__________________
If knowledge is power, how come those in power seem so stupid?
Last edited by Carth; Yesterday at 12:22.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 12:20
|
#83
|
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 15,460
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
Can't see why someone moving house is headline news with everything else gping on in the world.
The whole 'royal' family are a costly irrelevance. We need Cromwell back.
|
nice to hear from our resident property magnate
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Last edited by papa smurf; Yesterday at 12:40.
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 15:10
|
#84
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 36
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 16,774
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 15:47
|
#85
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,899
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
Is he broke?
|
The plaintiffs have insurance to cover around £18.5 million in costs, so probably not…
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 18:44
|
#86
|
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 70
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,869
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
The plaintiffs have insurance to cover around £18.5 million in costs, so probably not…
|
The total insurance [the claimants] have got, according to what they've told the court, is £16.5m. So in theory, the claimants personally are liable for the difference between that figure covered by insurance and the £34.5m.
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 18:46
|
#87
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet & YouFibre FTTP, Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 31,117
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Plus the insurance would not have been free.
__________________
 Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
|
|
Today, 20:06
|
#88
|
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 44,899
|
Re: Harry (formerly known as Prince) and Megan
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
The total insurance [the claimants] have got, according to what they've told the court, is £16.5m. So in theory, the claimants personally are liable for the difference between that figure covered by insurance and the £34.5m.
|
"Up to £34.5 million"
Quote:
They had insurance to cover up to £16.2m of Association Newspapers' costs in the event of losing the case - but Friday's ruling means the newspaper group could now try to recover up to the £34.5m that it said it had to spend to defend itself. This means the duke and others could face a bill of some £18m.
Justice Nicklin said: "I regard a claim for costs in excess of £34 million as, on its face, excessive and as giving rise to real concerns as to whether all of the costs now claimed by Associated were reasonably incurred and are reasonable in amount."
But he added he had "decided not to impose a ceiling on Associated's recoverable costs", as it would "be too broad-brushed, would risk unfairness, and would be vulnerable to the charge that it was arbitrary".
The judge also ruled that ANL's costs should be determined on an indemnity basis, which is more favourable to the publisher in terms of the amount it can recover, aside from where orders had already been made.
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04kwr9r1zlo
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:28.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
