Today, 03:13
|
#1321
|
|
cf.member
Join Date: Oct 2025
Posts: 12
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
If its Live TV via an aerial then its surely not Freely, so this seems to be a bit of a con.
|
Freely is a hybrid system with some channels available exclusively via an aerial, others available as streamed DVB with some channels available via both methods. Freely has its own EPG with different channel numbers to Freeview. It's not a con but it is extremely confusing.
|
|
|
Today, 10:11
|
#1322
|
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+
Posts: 15,274
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz2k
Freely is a hybrid system with some channels available exclusively via an aerial, others available as streamed DVB with some channels available via both methods. Freely has its own EPG with different channel numbers to Freeview. It's not a con but it is extremely confusing.
|
I wouldn’t have thought so. Most people just switch on the TV and select their channel from the EPG. They don’t care how they receive them.
__________________
Forumbox.co.uk
|
|
|
Today, 12:34
|
#1323
|
|
Woke and proud !
Join Date: Jun 2004
Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife
Posts: 10,085
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
I wouldn’t have thought so. Most people just switch on the TV and select their channel from the EPG. They don’t care how they receive them.
|
They might do for sport, if streamed 'live' action is way behind freeview coverage.
|
|
|
Today, 17:13
|
#1324
|
|
cf.member
Join Date: Oct 2025
Posts: 12
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
I wouldn’t have thought so. Most people just switch on the TV and select their channel from the EPG. They don’t care how they receive them.
|
Except that channel selection is not the part that is confusing. The confusion is that Freely via an aerial isn't the same as Freeview. It does confuse people that broadcast DTT is now carried on 2 different platforms which don't share channel numbers if they expect DTT to have a single, uniform, EPG. I suppose though that channel selection could be confusing to viewers if they have Freely in one room and Freeview in another. Not to mention the possibility of even more diverse channel numbers if they own a third tv which has Freeview Play with CLM.
---------- Post added at 16:13 ---------- Previous post was at 16:05 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
They might do for sport, if streamed 'live' action is way behind freeview coverage.
|
Possibly something they are trying to mitigate by using a variant of DVB for streamed Freely. Even Freeview has encoding / decoding delay. The challenge is to match them. In the end it will come down to how powerful the processors are in the TV. With manufacturers cutting costs (e.g. Sony TVs now being manufactured by TCL) it probably isn't something that will happen soon.
|
|
|
Today, 17:32
|
#1325
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,415
|
Re: The future of television
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taz2k
Freely is a hybrid system with some channels available exclusively via an aerial, others available as streamed DVB with some channels available via both methods. Freely has its own EPG with different channel numbers to Freeview. It's not a con but it is extremely confusing.
|
Interesting, I have not seen that mentioned anywhere before.
Freely has always been positioned as internet based, thanks for the info.
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:20.
|