Online Safety Bill Etc

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Pierre

are you half Palestinian?

Nope. How about you?

Originally Posted by Pierre

are you half Palestinian?

Since I'm quite sure you know the anser to that would be 'No', what exactly is the point of the question ?

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Paul

Since I'm quite sure you know the anser to that would be 'No', what exactly is the point of the question ?

No problem:

Originally Posted by Russ

I’m not condoning such attacks on politicians []israel[] But the hatred is understandable when the member (or party) []country[]in question has a rich (no pun) history of treating the common man []Palestinians[]with contempt whilst lining the pockets of their wealthy benefactors.[]colonising their land[]

Point being it’s the same argument used to justify the Oct 7th attacks being used to try to legitimise attacks on Tory MPs.

Literally straight out the playbook.

In either case, there is no excuse.

[Russ]

Oh right.

Guess you missed the part where I said I don’t condone attacks on anyone?

Congratulations on the effort at drama but at no time have I justified, or tried to justify, an attack.

In the words of Joey Swole, you need to do better.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Russ

Guess you missed the part where I said I don’t condone attacks on anyone?
.

No I didn’t miss it, it was there front and centre.


“I don’t condone”……god forbid. But I fully understand…………I mean who wouldn’t under the circumstances?

Just rhymes with, I’m not racist but………….just a little bit.

So no, I didn’t miss it, I ignored it because it’s not what you really think.

I’d have respected you more if you said you did condone it, as that’s what you really think, you know for members of the tory party.

---------- Post added at 22:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:05 ----------

Originally Posted by Russ

at no time have I justified, or tried to justify, an attack.
.

???????

If you are not trying to justify or explain away an attack

Then what is the point of this statement?

I’m not condoning such attacks on politicians. But the hatred is understandable when the member (or party) in question has a rich (no pun) history of treating the common man with contempt whilst lining the pockets of their wealthy benefactors.

Not condoning…………..but it’s “understandable”

[Russ]

In the past 21 years you’ve come out with some absolute weapons-grade dogshit on here but you’ve truly peaked now.

Adding words I did not say to twist my post to suit your own agenda? Truly nothing is beyond you.

And you’d have respected me more? To be honest I’m more offended that you assume I care whether you respect me or not.

Take your word twisting agenda elsewhere and stop pretending to know someone you genuinely know nothing about.

---------- Post added at 22:22 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ----------

Originally Posted by Pierre

Then what is the point of this statement?

Are you truly this dense?

Let me use smaller and simpler words for you.

I don’t agree with, advise or condone (apologies if that’s bit too big for you) physical attacks on any person or country. If I knew it was going to happen and I had a way of stopping it from occurring then I absolutely would.

However I understand the anger. Before you quote-edit this post too, let me qualify that but. Understanding anger, and condoning attacks are a world apart (perhaps not in yours but definitely in the minds of rational people).

I make no attempt to hide my disgust of the Tory Party. Doesn’t mean I want to see any of them harmed.

That clear enough for you?

[RichardCoulter]

Originally Posted by Itshim

Stop being a snowflake, words are not going to cut you , bash you over the head , or any other physical injury doubt they on there own will even steal your money

The words that we use are very important. Care must be taken because they can lead to self harm or suicide as has been pointed out many times along with the tragedies that resulted.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Russ

In the past 21 years you’ve come out with some absolute weapons-grade dogshit on here but you’ve truly peaked now.

I think I’ve got a few more years in me.

I think I’ve called it right. You can protest all you want, that’s how I see it. You’ve said your bit and I’ve said my bit.

That enough of this utter nonsense, back to the topic.

[RichardCoulter]

St Albans is the latest place to want to ban smartphones for children (under 14 in this case):
.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s%20for%20them.

[mrmistoffelees]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

St Albans is the latest place to want to ban smartphones for children (under 14 in this case):
.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s%20for%20them.

You can keep posting stuff like this. But, take a breath, sit down somewhere nice and comfy and really take in and understand the following.

It’s. Not. Going. To. Happen.

Thanks for your time.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

St Albans is the latest place to want to ban smartphones for children (under 14 in this case)

I want to ban tractors from the road between 6am and 8pm, I suspect I have about the same chance of it happening.

[RichardCoulter]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea.

Schools seem to be on a roll with wanting to ban things. A primary school wants to ban it's 7-11 year old girls from wearing skirts as they are wearing them too short:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea.

Is this innapropriately sexualising children or a good idea to deter paedophiles from taking an interest in them?

[Sirius]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea.

Schools seem to be on a roll with wanting to ban things. A primary school wants to ban it's 7-11 year old girls from wearing skirts as they are wearing them too short:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea.

Is this innapropriately sexualising children or a good idea to deter paedophiles from taking an interest in them?

I take anything printed in the mail with a pinch of salt.

[Russ]

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter

Is this innapropriately sexualising children or a good idea to deter paedophiles from taking an interest in them?

Nothing will do that.