| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 13:49 | #3406 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mr K  It's not about the kids and teachers, it's about getting their parents back to work, regardless of consequences. Hence the youngest kids most likely to need parents first. |  Not at Eton though!
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 13:51 | #3407 |  
	| Wisdom & truth 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: RG41 Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400 
					Posts: 12,616
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	You've assumed Mr K's mantle, jfman!Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by jfman  Not at Eton though! |  
 Come to think of it, when have you challenged Mr K?
 
 
				__________________Seph.
 
 My advice is at your risk.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 14:00 | #3408 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sephiroth  You've assumed Mr K's mantle, jfman!
 Come to think of it, when have you challenged Mr K?
 
 |  I’m simply making a statement of fact. How others interpret that is up to them.
 
I’d be very interested in the science. 
 
I don’t feel the need to challenge Mr. K although don’t always agree. There’s enough people on the case already.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 14:21 | #3409 |  
	| The Invisible Woman Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton. Age: 73 Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo 
					Posts: 40,354
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mr K  It's not about the kids and teachers, it's about getting their parents back to work, regardless of consequences. Hence the youngest kids most likely to need parents first. |  I know that I just think they should have chosen an older group like secondary age.
		 
				__________________Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 14:23 | #3410 |  
	| laeva recumbens anguis Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 68 Services: Premiere Collection 
					Posts: 43,777
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by jfman  Not at Eton though! |  Not many reception and year 1 children at Eton*   *it starts at year 9 (aged 13 or so) 
				__________________Thank you for calling the Abyss.
 If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void,  or press 2 to begin your stare.
 If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 14:40 | #3411 |  
	| Mum 30/09/20 Dad 08/08/24 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha, A secret Moonbase (shh don't tell anybody) Age: 56 Services: 2 x TiVo 360s, SH5. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G, Ton's of Smart Home stuff, & Cuddy Toy 
					Posts: 17,257
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			I messaged a guy at work as to things at work.
 
 A guy whose wife was in ICU with COVID-19 is now back at home and he is back to work on monday.
 
 
 My mate said there are rumours of another 8 being furloughed.
 
 So it looks like I may not be going back on July 1st.
 
				__________________I'm a Trustee & Secretary for a local charity
 
 STAY AT HOME: I found out that mum will never walk again as the coronavirus attacked her nervous system. She died on September 30th.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 14:43 | #3412 |  
	| The Dark Satanic Mills 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: floating in the ether 
					Posts: 13,219
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mr K  It's not about the kids and teachers, it's about getting their parents back to work, regardless of consequences. Hence the youngest kids most likely to need parents first. |  Correct and I can’t wait to send mine back
		 
				__________________The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 15:22 | #3413 |  
	| laeva recumbens anguis Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 68 Services: Premiere Collection 
					Posts: 43,777
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			https://schoolsweek.co.uk/dfe-chief-...ning-guidance/
	Quote: 
	
		| The Department for Education’s chief scientific adviser admitted he has not assessed whether guidance on reopening schools is effective, adding the current advice is “draft” and “will be developed”. 
 Appearing in front of the Parliamentary science and technology committee today, Osama Rahman also admitted the DfE had done no modelling on the impact on transmission rates of starting to reopen schools after the May half term break.
 
 During a hearing that left some MPs visibly bemused, Rahman also suggested the government guidance issued yesterday on safety is a “draft”, and will be reissued after further consultation with Public Health England.
 
 He also said the decision to reopen schools was made by cabinet, not the DfE.
 |  
	Quote: 
	
		| Education committee chair Robert Halfon asked what scientific evidence base underpinned the decision to reopen schools to pupils in reception, year 1 and year 6, and what modelling had been done. 
 “The department has not done any modelling,” Rahman replied. “One of the SAGE groups has done various bits of modelling for different scenarios on what years you can bring back. My understanding is those will be published in due course.”
 
 Halfon responded that “surely you must have scientific evidence the base underpinning the department’s decision?”, to which Rahman responded: “That was a cabinet decision following advice from SAGE.”
 |  
				__________________Thank you for calling the Abyss.
 If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void,  or press 2 to begin your stare.
 If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 15:55 | #3414 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,766
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Maggy  I know that I just think they should have chosen an older group like secondary age. |  Particularly as they will have exams to consider. 
 ---------- Post added at 14:55 ---------- Previous post was at 14:52 ----------
 
 
 The British Heart Foundation is questioning the logic of having a blanket 70+ policy, seeing as slightly older women cope with the virus better.  Maybe it should be changed to men over 65?
https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsu...i_u=8-15893393 
Why are so many BAME people dying of the virus?  This is their take on it:
https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsu...i_u=8-15893393 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 18:28 | #3415 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Kairdiff-by-the-sea Age: 69 Services: TVXL BBXL Superhub 2ac (wired) 1Tb Tivo 
					Posts: 10,289
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			Schools open. Kids go back to school. Parents go back to work. Stocks of supplies rebuilt ready for the next wave. School close. Kids stay home. Parents stay home. Stocks diminish. And repeat....
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 20:54 | #3416 |  
	| The Dark Satanic Mills 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: floating in the ether 
					Posts: 13,219
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hugh   |  As mentioned earlier, there is nothing scientific about the decision, it is a Political and economic decision.
 
One that I support.
		 
				__________________The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 21:09 | #3417 |  
	| Woke and proud ! 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Services: TV, Phone, BB, a wife 
					Posts: 9,945
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Pierre  As mentioned earlier, there is nothing scientific about the decision, it is a Political and economic decision.
 One that I support.
 |  Which is why teachers are rightly concerned.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 21:12 | #3418 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Leeds 
					Posts: 1,458
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Pierre  As mentioned earlier, there is nothing scientific about the decision, it is a Political and economic decision.
 One that I support.
 |  
A stupid and reckless one at that, but they're still hiding behind the (lack of) science to justify it.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 21:12 | #3419 |  
	| Rise above the players 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Wokingham Services: 2 V6 with 360 software, ITVX, 4+, Prime, Netflix, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount+, Discovery+ 
					Posts: 15,138
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  The British Heart Foundation is questioning the logic of having a blanket 70+ policy, seeing as slightly older women cope with the virus better.  Maybe it should be changed to men over 65. |  It is not appropriate to set an age limit. Some 75-year-olds are healthier than some 40-year-olds. This is age discrimination.
 
Restrictions should be recommended (not imposed) on those with underlying medical conditions that make the person susceptible to the coronavirus.
 
Everyone else should be going back to work.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  16-05-2020, 21:16 | #3420 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Pierre  As mentioned earlier, there is nothing scientific about the decision, it is a Political and economic decision.
 One that I support.
 |  At last an admission that “back to work” has no basis in medical science, risking a deadly second wave and is simply the Tories acting on a wing and a prayer hoping to revive the economy.
 
Of course, they ignore the long term devastating economic impact of a second wave (and inevitable second lockdown).
 
This would be entertaining if it wasn’t so tragic.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14. |