| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 14:50 | #3241 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by spiderplant  Yes I realised that after I'd posted but too late to correct my post.  Apologies. 
As I was taught at a very young age, having a calculator is all well and good, but you have to understand what you're doing with it   |  No worries I thought I'd made a glaring error that I'd missed.  
 ---------- Post added at 13:50 ---------- Previous post was at 13:47 ----------
 
 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by OLD BOY  It was to rebuild the economy so we had the money to help your 'common people'. Money doesn't grow on trees, unless you have a garden like Mr Corbyn's.
 Yes, that's what Mr Corbyn thinks. Good luck with that approach.
 |  Money can be found, it always is to bail out big businesses. Money does not grow on trees but it's introduced by central banks. Increasing money supply doesn't make anyone Venezuela nor does it always increase inflation during economic downturns.
 
As I've said before your household budget based analysis is fundamentally flawed at macroeconomic level. The USA has frequently spent it's way out of recession. That doesn't, and never has, made them socialist by any definition going.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 14:52 | #3242 |  
	| Wisdom & truth 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: RG41 Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400 
					Posts: 12,628
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	@jfmanQuote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by jfman  No worries I thought I'd made a glaring error that I'd missed.  
 ---------- Post added at 13:50 ---------- Previous post was at 13:47 ----------
 
 
 
Money can be found, it always is to bail out big businesses. Money does not grow on trees but it's introduced by central banks. Increasing money supply doesn't make anyone Venezuela nor does it always increase inflation during economic downturns.
 
As I've said before your household budget based analysis is fundamentally flawed at macroeconomic level. The USA has frequently spent it's way out of recession. That doesn't, and never has, made them socialist by any definition going. |  
 Perhaps you can tip my formula into the spreadsheet and compare it with yours.
 
 
 
 
				__________________Seph.
 
 My advice is at your risk.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 14:59 | #3243 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			Aha!
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:18 | #3244 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2008 
					Posts: 10,767
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			If what's being proposed is accepted as the correct way of getting the economy going again whilst protecting people, why didn't we do this instead of lockdown?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:21 | #3245 |  
	| Wisdom & truth 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: RG41 Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400 
					Posts: 12,628
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	I suspect that there's psychology behind this as well as rudimentary disease control method.Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  If what's being proposed is accepted as the correct way of getting the economy going again whilst protecting people, why didn't we do this instead of lockdown? |  
 Peops are now trained in taking care - aka being alert.
 
 
 
				__________________Seph.
 
 My advice is at your risk.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:27 | #3246 |  
	| Architect of Ideas 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2004 
					Posts: 11,146
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  If what's being proposed is accepted as the correct way of getting the economy going again whilst protecting people, why didn't we do this instead of lockdown? |  They aren't mutually exclusive or competing options. The health crisis and economic crisis are one and the same. 
 
You couldn't control spread without lockdown.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:29 | #3247 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral 
					Posts: 37,181
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by OLD BOY  It was to rebuild the economy so we had the money to help your 'common people'. Money doesn't grow on trees, unless you have a garden like Mr Corbyn's. |  No idea what Corbyn's garden looks like.
 
Ayway, when Boris was asked what the difference will be between the austerity measure from 2010 and what is ahead of us, he said "this time we want to help everyday people".
 
Which means that wasn't the intention 10 years ago but let's face it, we always knew that.
		 
				__________________From Jim Cornette: “Ty, Fy, bye”
   |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:41 | #3248 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Age: 39 Services: Plusnet FFTC 
					Posts: 4,944
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by RichardCoulter  If what's being proposed is accepted as the correct way of getting the economy going again whilst protecting people, why didn't we do this instead of lockdown? |  To use an analogy, the virus is a runaway train and the lockdown was a brake. Basically it has slowed down enough now you can release the brake a little.
 
If we release the lockdown and there is no difference then the lockdown was a mistake (although we didn't know that at the time, you only get reliable data on the virus after it has infected a lot of people - also the Chinese data was bullshit)
		 
				__________________"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 15:59 | #3249 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hiding . .  from all the experts 
					Posts: 4,456
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			How do they work out the current 'R' figure?
 and how accurate is it?
 
				__________________  “You get a wonderful view from the point of no return.” ~ T. Pratchett  |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 16:09 | #3250 |  
	| vox populi vox dei 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: the last resort Services: every thing 
					Posts: 14,824
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Carth  How do they work out the current 'R' figure?
 and how accurate is it?
 |  They look on CF and see what the experts are saying   
				__________________To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 16:16 | #3251 |  
	| laeva recumbens anguis Cable Forum Team 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 68 Services: Premiere Collection 
					Posts: 43,794
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Carth  How do they work out the current 'R' figure?
 and how accurate is it?
 |  
Using the Government COVID alert scale of 1 to 5, and using the formula 
COVID alert level = R (rate of infection) + number of infections 
We are at a COVID alert level of between 223060.5 and 223060.9...    
				__________________Thank you for calling the Abyss.
 If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void,  or press 2 to begin your stare.
 If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 16:22 | #3252 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Age: 39 Services: Plusnet FFTC 
					Posts: 4,944
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Carth  How do they work out the current 'R' figure?
 and how accurate is it?
 |  The simplest way is you put the total infections data you've been given by the NHS into a graph and you fit an exponential function to it, the best fitting R number is then reported to be R.
 
The accuracy is determined by the amount of data you have (which unfortunately means you are least accurate at the beginning of the pandemic and most accurate after it's all over)
 
Now of course you say, what if the NHS data is incomplete. Well that is a major issue.
 
Also remember R is just a sort of average and it is vulnerable to various conditions at the time. Social distancing and lockdown pushes R down so it's entirely possible different countries have different Rs for the same virus.
		 
				__________________"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 16:37 | #3253 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hiding . .  from all the experts 
					Posts: 4,456
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			Just guesswork again then, using incomplete and possibly flawed data  
Also, using the formula shown by Hugh, my neighborhood has an R value of 0 so I should be free to party & BBQ to my hearts content . . .  in fact other neighborhoods with a zero rating could join in    
of course, none of us have been tested so we really aren't sure if we've had it, got it, or are naturally immune to it    
Going by the news up this end of the country, Cleethorpes is about as safe as you'll get too   
				__________________  “You get a wonderful view from the point of no return.” ~ T. Pratchett  |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 16:42 | #3254 |  
	| cf.mega poster 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2003 Age: 39 Services: Plusnet FFTC 
					Posts: 4,944
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			It isn't guesswork. This is literally how you define R. It's not like viruses come carved with R  values in them.
		 
				__________________"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  12-05-2020, 17:03 | #3255 |  
	| Wisdom & truth 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: RG41 Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400 
					Posts: 12,628
				      | 
				
				Re: Coronavirus
			 
 
			
			
	Pretty much sums the whole thing up.Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Carth  Just guesswork again then, using incomplete and possibly flawed data  
Also, using the formula shown by Hugh, my neighborhood has an R value of 0 so I should be free to party & BBQ to my hearts content . . .  in fact other neighborhoods with a zero rating could join in    
of course, none of us have been tested so we really aren't sure if we've had it, got it, or are naturally immune to it    
Going by the news up this end of the country, Cleethorpes is about as safe as you'll get too   |  
				__________________Seph.
 
 My advice is at your risk.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51. |