PM Boris forms a government - Page 149

Dave42 · 11-09-2019, 21:16

Rosamund Urwin

@RosamundUrwin
· 2m
What's different about the new Yellowhammer document that the government has just published compared with the one I got hold of last month? The heading.
What did the version I had say? BASE SCENARIO
Now what does the new one say? HMG Reasonable Worst Case Planning Assumptions

the one than did leak story of yellowhammer

1andrew1 · 11-09-2019, 21:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78

The bank of england has even changed its tune from the end of mankind as we know it to well actually I think we can sleep at night knowing we are going to be ok.

The Bank of England has upgraded its forecasts because the leave date has changed. Business is now a lot more prepared for a Brexit at the end of October 2019 than a Brexit at the end of March or earlier.

papa smurf · 11-09-2019, 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Yellowhammer documents published. It's not good: https://twitter.com/alexwickham/stat...57735295623168

This is a Government document that they didn't want to publish.

I thought it was in the papers not so long ago.

**Hugh** · 11-09-2019, 21:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf

I thought it was in the papers not so long ago.

They said the leaked documents were old versions - it would appear that they were economical with the truth

1andrew1 · 11-09-2019, 21:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh

They said the leaked documents were old versions - it would appear that they were economical with the truth

Well, we now know one good reason why Cummings and BoJo prorogued Parliament.

Dave42 · 11-09-2019, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Well, we now know one good reason why Cummings and BoJo prorogued Parliament.

and we know why they changed the heading on it

Gavin78 · 11-09-2019, 21:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

The Bank of England has upgraded its forecasts because the leave date has changed. Business is now a lot more prepared for a Brexit at the end of October 2019 than a Brexit at the end of March or earlier.

Which goes back to the start that remainers are still stuck in 2016.... Leave have moved on from that,

**Mick** · 11-09-2019, 21:51

Historian David Starkey, just now on LBC, new title for Lib UnDemocrats just now...

“Liberal perhaps, Democrats, Not!”

Couldn’t agree more.

1andrew1 · 11-09-2019, 22:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh

They said the leaked documents were old versions - it would appear that they were economical with the truth

Looks like from those documents, we need to be economical with more than just the truth. Medicines, electricity and fresh food being just three such things.

jfman · 11-09-2019, 23:21

Vote Leave backers, Johnson donors and Rees-Mogg’s investment firm have taken up £8bn in short positions on the pound.

Backing Britain to succeed.

Carth · 12-09-2019, 00:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick

Correct - You have 2 out of 3 cases, saying Boris Proroguing Parliament was lawful and a Scottish Court saying not -, you got a former Supreme Court Justice, Lord Sumption saying, it's not unlawful, who's right...?

Doesn't matter Mick, the usual case with 'these people' is to ignore any result they don't like and keep going until they get a result they call a victory.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

In fairness most came out their housing estate flats to vote against out their Polish neighbours.

You know, that's exactly the type of comment I'd expect from an arrogant uneducated pleb. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42

that the problem no one has a plan

Boris had a plan, the only plan that will work against the EU, but you lot scuppered that by showing just how far you'll go to get your own way . . .

**Hugh** · 12-09-2019, 00:30

"We want Parliamentary Sovereignty and our Courts to decide!!"

"No, not that way!!"

Carth · 12-09-2019, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh

"We want Parliamentary Sovereignty and our Courts to decide!!"

"No, not that way!!"

If that's aimed at me, my opinion of courts and 'justice' has, for a long long time, been unprintable.

I've also had that opinion of Parliament and its members, but, much to my shame and embarrassment, decided to place my trust in them to carry out something which they promised to do.

Second hand car salesman have a better integrity rating

jfman · 12-09-2019, 02:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth

Doesn't matter Mick, the usual case with 'these people' is to ignore any result they don't like and keep going until they get a result they call a victory.

You know, that's exactly the type of comment I'd expect from an arrogant uneducated pleb. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Boris had a plan, the only plan that will work against the EU, but you lot scuppered that by showing just how far you'll go to get your own way . . .

No leave voters were from council estates? None that were worried about freedom of movement?

Exactly the level of ignorance I’d expect I suppose...

---------- Post added at 01:15 ---------- Previous post was at 01:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh

"We want Parliamentary Sovereignty and our Courts to decide!!"

"No, not that way!!"

Brexit at all costs, regardless of consequence.

**Mick** · 12-09-2019, 09:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh

"We want Parliamentary Sovereignty and our Courts to decide!!"

"No, not that way!!"

Stop being Antagonistic Hugh - It's also misleading nonsense to say the least put in that context.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman

Brexit at all costs, regardless of consequence.

Consequence is Irrelevant - Brexit was decided by Democracy - it won the vote, so it must be enacted, if it some how does not work and there has been Saboteurs from the get go it has to be said, we should be able to decide our fate but the vote to leave must be respected first, your side lost.