New info about Princess Diana death - Page 3

Zee · 17-08-2013, 20:34

I don't believe she "died in a car accident" I believe she was murdered. She was a very strong, powerful and good woman and I somehow don't believe they wanted to have this type of woman being represented as part of the royal family.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ

No, various investigations did that.

Investigation by who? the people who planned out her murder?

Russ · 17-08-2013, 21:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan

I agree that I think this was an accident. I too, do not know of who may have benefited from her death. but just because I don't know about them doesn't mean there isn't someone out there who did benefit in some way.

on the whole, I agree with you that it was an accident. I'm not with you on the whole 'if it feels right' bit though. but that is simply how I am. if someone explains something as intuition, to me it means there is something to be learned as to what exactly gives one that 'feeling'.

for example, if someone says they don't trust someone but can't explain why, it generally means they have picked up on elements of personality, vocal tonality / speed, spoken word, body language and so on (behaviour), which in the past have been attributed to others who turned out to be untrustworthy to that person. it's just a case of being aware of what those traits are. once we have valid explanations with repeatable consistency, there is no more mystery. those 'feelings' of intuition become behavioural patterns we can be aware of in others.

I have a very finely tuned 'gut reaction' to most things in life. Thankfully it has yet to let me and what it's telling me about this is it was an accident. For something as big as assassinating a former Royal there would need to be a huge undercurrent story which we'd either have had an inkling about or would have come out by now (probably by a Daily Express reporter). I've travelled under that bridge, I've see how bad the traffic is, that plus other things leave me in no doubt it wasn't a hit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zee

Investigation by who? the people who planned out her murder?

The BBC investigated it. Various publications did so and let's not forget the official inquest too.

---------- Post added at 22:08 ---------- Previous post was at 21:43 ----------

Plus do you not think the 2 future Kings have resources to look in to conspiracy claims of their own?

Derek · 17-08-2013, 21:20

For me it's a simple case of what is more likely.

Either she died as a result of an accident caused by a drunk driver going too fast and erratically or a large number of people were involved in setting up a strobe/contact accident and hoped that none of the paparazzi obtained photos of said murder and none of the players would ever admit to their part in the plot and it's execution and their involvement would remain secret for all time.

I know which one my money is on. Conspiracy theories can always find some parts of the story to fit their version of events but the whole story only fits the official story, she died as a result of an accident.

The credibility of this new information seems pretty suspect already to say the least.

idi banashapan · 17-08-2013, 22:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek

I know which one my money is on. Conspiracy theories can always find some parts of the story to fit their version of events but the whole story only fits the official story, she died as a result of an accident.

and this will always be the case if official investigations (into any event which gives rise to conspiracy theories), omit the information that they do not want the public to know. if they (whoever that might be) control the information, then they control the verdict.

opinions, feelings and reports do not necessarily mean or present fact either whole or in part. we should always question, otherwise how would we learn more than our teacher wants us to know? and if we merely parrot the words on the page, we will never progress.

TheDaddy · 17-08-2013, 22:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ

[/COLOR]Plus do you not think the 2 future Kings have resources to look in to conspiracy claims of their own?

They were in on it to, if it ever gets out that it was Phillip in the tunnel with the blunderbuss it get out that James Hewitt is Harry's father to.

Stephen · 17-08-2013, 22:38

Have amended the title to include refernce to what the thread is actually about.

I really think it was a bad car accident and nothing else. People will always created conspirisies to try and explain event they dont understand or can't properly get enough facts on.

Gary L · 17-08-2013, 22:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

James Hewitt is Harry's father to.

Everyone already knows that.

idi banashapan · 17-08-2013, 23:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

They were in on it to, if it ever gets out that it was Phillip in the tunnel with the blunderbuss it get out that James Hewitt is Harry's father to.

It's like you're mocking those whose opinions don't match your own - not very mature. Worse still, those whom you are mocking would be expecting exactly this kind of response - akin to making a reference to tin hats.

Effectively, your post would be considered a fail on both parts. Must try harder!

**Damien** · 17-08-2013, 23:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan

It's like you're mocking those whose opinions don't match your own - not very mature. Worse still, those whom you are mocking would be expecting exactly this kind of response - akin to making a reference to tin hats.

Effectively, your post would be considered a fail on both parts. Must try harder!

To be honest there is something that happened here and that is what happened. There is hardly any evidence that differs from the official account and while your entitled to your opinion you're not entitled to have to taken seriously.

**Maggy** · 17-08-2013, 23:42

Between a driver under the influence and the crazy paparazzi it was an inevitable outcome..

The trouble is conspiracy theorists always want another outcome because they can't accept the truth because they are still grieving over her.Well that and the fact it helps sell newspapers it will keep rumbling on.

Same with the Maddy case..the newspapers love it when some 'new' development happens because they sell a few more papers than usual.

TheDaddy · 18-08-2013, 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan

It's like you're mocking those whose opinions don't match your own - not very mature. Worse still, those whom you are mocking would be expecting exactly this kind of response - akin to making a reference to tin hats.

Effectively, your post would be considered a fail on both parts. Must try harder!

Err no it isn't, get over yourself, it was a joke, I've no interest in this what so ever or any ones opinions on it and had the thread title had any relevance to what the thread contained I wouldn't even have opened it and the only thing I'll be trying harder to do in it is leave. I don't even find it mildly interesting that this whole plot would've fallen apart if she'd simply worn a seatbelt.

Russ · 18-08-2013, 05:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek

For me it's a simple case of what is more likely.

Either she died as a result of an accident caused by a drunk driver going too fast and erratically or a large number of people were involved in setting up a strobe/contact accident and hoped that none of the paparazzi obtained photos of said murder and none of the players would ever admit to their part in the plot and it's execution and their involvement would remain secret for all time.

I know which one my money is on. Conspiracy theories can always find some parts of the story to fit their version of events but the whole story only fits the official story, she died as a result of an accident.

The credibility of this new information seems pretty suspect already to say the least.

This

Pierre · 18-08-2013, 05:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zee

I don't believe she "died in a car accident" I believe she was murdered.

Yes, and the CIA planned 9/11 and the moon landings were faked

18-08-2013, 06:17

I think Mohamed al fayed has enough money and clout to get to the bottom of what happened and even he backed off after a while ,knowing he was flogging a dead horse .

peanut · 18-08-2013, 09:00

I don't believe everything I'm told, and just because it's official doesn't mean it is true. I don't think we're really told the truth so I just try and keep an open mind about things.

Though those that do believe everything they are told because it's official then laugh as soon as the word conspiracy is mentioned are probably just too gullible. I couldn't listen to much they have to say when their minds are just too closed. We're never going to find out the truth about anything.