General : Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 4.

[Dave42]

Originally Posted by DaMac

Al jazeera

no

[colin25]

Originally Posted by DaMac

Al jazeera

Just call me Al

[Dave42]

Originally Posted by johnasimmons

I remember Alias with Jennifer Garner was on Bravo, mmmm

where you been hiding John mate

[undertakereddie]

Originally Posted by johnasimmons

I remember Alias with Jennifer Garner was on Bravo, mmmm

White Collar series 1 aired on Bravo before sky dropped the channel. Also Hawaii 5-O was supposed to air on Bravo Originally but ended up on Sky 1 instead because of the closure of Bravo in 2011.

[Mad Max]

Originally Posted by Lostlam

Read my post.

You scoundrel! you changed it......

[denphone]

Originally Posted by colin25

Just call me Al

No this man sings it much better then you do dear chap.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq-gYOrU8bA

[Arthurgray50@blu]

Let me explain something - Sky have offered Atlantic at a reasonable price - Tight fiested pay the amount which could be reasonable.

VM won't have BT Sports.

Customers are crying out for these channels - VM just want these channels on the cheap, then ripp off tghe customers with a higher price to make money.

[Dave42]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Let me explain something - Sky have offered Atlantic at a reasonable price - Tight fiested pay the amount which could be reasonable.
VM won't have BT Sports.

Customers are crying out for these channels - VM just want these channels on the cheap, then ripp off tghe customers with a higher price to make money.

please do tell who else has got SA Arthur if it was reasonal price please tell us who has it oh YEAH NO ONE because sky charge over the top price and also please tell who BT have wholesaled channel to oh YEAH NO ONE get the picture Arthur and please tell who sky customers pay for BT sport oh yeah BT not sky you pay BT directly that can not work on VM and one more thing you have all ready said you not pay £12 for bt sports

[colin25]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Let me explain something - Sky have offered Atlantic at a reasonable price - Tight fiested pay the amount which could be reasonable.

VM won't have BT Sports.

Customers are crying out for these channels - VM just want these channels on the cheap, then ripp off tghe customers with a higher price to make money.

You are right..i have seen a lot of crying

[toady]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Let me explain something - Sky have offered Atlantic at a reasonable price - Tight fiested pay the amount which could be reasonable.

It might be a price that Sky thinks is reasonable, however VM customers might baulk that the price rise required to pay for it

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

VM won't have BT Sports.

Customers are crying out for these channels - VM just want these channels on the cheap, then ripp off tghe customers with a higher price to make money.

Again, BT might think the price is reasonable but again VM customers may baulk at the price, how many people here would pay £15 a month for the BT Sports channels on top of their current packages?

[spankysmagicpian]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Let me explain something - Sky have offered Atlantic at a reasonable price

What price was quoted for that Arthur?

[colin25]

Originally Posted by toady

It might be a price that Sky thinks is reasonable, however VM customers might baulk that the price rise required to pay for it

Again, BT might think the price is reasonable but again VM customers may baulk at the price, how many people here would pay £15 a month for the BT Sports channels on top of their current packages?

I certainly wouldn't pay

[Doug P]

Don't think it would be what I would call reasonable either.....

[spankysmagicpian]

It all depends how stubborn BT are and how long they are prepared to have their shows watched by not very many people.

Clare Baldings 'flagship' sports show last night got an average of 1000 viewers.

We'll have to see how the PL matches pan out for them.

[Henkesghost]

Originally Posted by toady

It might be a price that Sky thinks is reasonable, however VM customers might baulk that the price rise required to pay for it



Again, BT might think the price is reasonable but again VM customers may baulk at the price?

Would be nice to be offered the chance to baulk or not to baulk at it Would it have been so difficult for them to canvas Virginmedia subscribers to assess what we would be willing to pay and take that to the never ending saga that is the Virgin v absolutely everybody negotiating table?