Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
17-01-2012, 10:20
|
#646
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,385
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Weird how this post came about when I'm just looking at designs for a 1.09Ghz collinear..
My worry with replacing a dipole for a collinear would be an impedance mismatch especially when running duplex on a single antenna, last thing you need is the transmit power to be feeding down the line to the receiver or causing oscillation further into the PCB.
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 13:04
|
#647
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 17
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Superhub has worked well for me up until Sunday. On Sunday the wireless connection suddenly became very unstable, dropping connection and offering extremely erratic speeds when it was connected. Wired connections were still 100% ok.
Seeing the classic signs of interference, and with people recently moved into the flat next door I assumed that they'd turned on a router to the same channel as mine and changed from 7 to 13. This fixed the problem until Monday. On Monday the connection speed remained normal but started to flat out stop working every 5 minutes or so, until the client (iPhone/laptop internal/PC external dongle) was disconnected then reconnected, but the problem would return a few minutes later.
This prompted me to change channel again (to 12), even though I could see through my PC's software that there weren't many competing networks and certainly none on CH13. This returned stability for the next hour or so until I went to bed.
Then this morning while browsing the net on my phone it returned, requiring me to turn off wifi and then back on in order to regain the connection. Faulty hardware, or what?
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 13:12
|
#648
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC,
FoxSat HDR for TV,
Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
I have seen at least one report where a Superhub on auto apparently followed the frequency used by other Superhubs. It seems far fetched to me but so does a year waiting for a diagnosis and fix of a memory leak when there are supposedly half a million of the wretched things in operation.
As has been mentioned before there are only actually 3 non-overlapping channels in the 2.4GHz band - 1 6 and 11. Running on (say) 7 when there is another strong signal on 6 doesn't mean you will avoid all degradation.
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 13:21
|
#649
|
|
Wisdom & truth
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: RG41: 1Gig VOLT
Rutland: Gigaclear 400/400
Posts: 12,928
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Possibly next door are on Auto-channel or have one of these BT HH3s that bugger everyone else up at random.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 13:30
|
#650
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,385
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
All the BT hubs round here seem to be on ch10 so I normally manually put myself down in the lower ranges. Mind you I only bother with a G rated kindle and laptop on wifi as the whole house is wired for gigabit ethernet
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 15:45
|
#651
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
This is why my network runs across channel 1, 5, 9, 13, 36, and 40.
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 16:57
|
#652
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC,
FoxSat HDR for TV,
Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Greedy boy 
---------- Post added at 17:57 ---------- Previous post was at 17:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
... or have one of these BT HH3s that bugger everyone else up at random.
|
can you confirm that Infinity comes with a modem so there's no need to use a HH at all please...
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 17:30
|
#653
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 78
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Loving the thread title.
The superhub is awful.
1 - To achieve 100 meg I need to be on 5ghz
2 - If i'm on 5ghz my iphones won't work on wifi
3 - The superhub doesn't support simultaneous 2.5 and 5ghz
....so....
Ditch the superhub for wifi - invest in an airport and.....
1 - Get 5 and 2.4 ghz
2 - Immediate wifi speed increase from 70 meg to 95 meg down.
Sorted.
The Superhub was costing be 25 meg down!!!!!
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 17:50
|
#654
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks
Greedy boy 
|
Unlicensed spectrum is unlicensed.
Bite me
|
|
|
17-01-2012, 18:17
|
#655
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,048
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
the rev03 for me seems improved on latency over the rev01 superhub.
|
|
|
18-01-2012, 19:48
|
#656
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Albans, Herts
Services: TV XL w/ All Sky HD Collections. 2xTivo, 1x VHD
Phone XL
Broadband XXL
Posts: 91
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Originally Posted by stairpotato
Loving the thread title.
The superhub is awful.
1 - To achieve 100 meg I need to be on 5ghz
2 - If i'm on 5ghz my iphones won't work on wifi
3 - The superhub doesn't support simultaneous 2.5 and 5ghz
....so....
Ditch the superhub for wifi - invest in an airport and.....
1 - Get 5 and 2.4 ghz
2 - Immediate wifi speed increase from 70 meg to 95 meg down.
Sorted.
The Superhub was costing be 25 meg down!!!!!
|
Whilst I have no doubt you're having major issues with the shub, many people's works fine. I get a very solid 120mbps on mine without any dropouts. It's on 2.5ghz with a ton of people in our local area channel hopping daily.
---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Unlicensed spectrum is unlicensed.
Bite me 
|
Quick query, how did you go about getting access to ch 36 and 40? DD-WRT/OpenWRT?
Cheers
|
|
|
18-01-2012, 20:18
|
#657
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Any 5Ghz device should be able to do those channels by default.
|
|
|
18-01-2012, 21:09
|
#658
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 16,032
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
5GHz is immense
|
|
|
18-01-2012, 21:22
|
#659
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
BFWA is immenser. Range wise that is.
|
|
|
18-01-2012, 21:31
|
#660
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 16,032
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:34.
|