Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
03-09-2011, 20:05
|
#16
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Preston
Services: VIP.152b/b,2xTivos,Vm mobile+ipad 4th gen,BT Sports.sky2tbHD,sky3d+ extra+Sports+Movies HD(Murdoch's
Posts: 1,947
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDFootyMan
I agree with the Batman.
Given enough time, we'll have a "Should Virgin increase the cost of their HD charge?" thread, after Sky announce that Virgin want Sky Atlantic 2 HD on the cheap.
|
VM want every HD channel on the cheap,Thats why we aint getting any new ones.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 20:18
|
#17
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Services: VM XL TV with VM TiVo 1TB x 2 > VM XL BB > VM XL Telephone
Posts: 8,384
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
All the UKTV HD channels will launch this Autumn.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 20:26
|
#18
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,876
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic
All the UKTV HD channels will launch this Autumn.
|
So Dave HD, Watch HD and Good Food HD will be launching in the Autumn and Alibi HD in 2012? If so that's a start but we need ITV 2, 3 and 4 HD plus History HD as a minimum.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 20:29
|
#19
|
|
RIp Sweetness
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Not Forgetting ESPN America in HD
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 20:58
|
#20
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wigan
Age: 64
Posts: 486
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear
Not Forgetting ESPN America in HD 
|
I doubt VM will spend any money on a channel hardly anyone watches.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 21:55
|
#21
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ipswich
Services: Ultimate ooomph
Posts: 402
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
I'm watching college football on ESPN America right now wishing it was in HD! Think you'll find it's more popular than people think!
But going back to the HD charge I wouldn't pay anymore than I already do, yes the premium HD charge is absorbed in my VIP package but regardless I'm still paying £7 P/M somewhere so I don't feel I should pay anymore when I get less HD than Sky for a tiny £3.25 P/M less than what they do for lots more HD.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 22:21
|
#22
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wigan
Age: 64
Posts: 486
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firmsky
I'm watching college football on ESPN America right now wishing it was in HD! Think you'll find it's more popular than people think!
But going back to the HD charge I wouldn't pay anymore than I already do, yes the premium HD charge is absorbed in my VIP package but regardless I'm still paying £7 P/M somewhere so I don't feel I should pay anymore when I get less HD than Sky for a tiny £3.25 P/M less than what they do for lots more HD.
|
It's average viewing figures, and this includes sky and vm sd and hd combined, is less than 9000. I think we all make the mistake of thinking if we like something most people do to.
Regards
John
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 22:30
|
#23
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ipswich
Services: Ultimate ooomph
Posts: 402
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Fair enough and thanks for enlightening me John, surely at those poor figures VM could negotiate the channel even with their tiny budget!!
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 22:41
|
#24
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Coventry
Services: Virgin Media 1TB TiVo, 500Gb TiVo, TV XL, 60Mb Broadband, Phone
Posts: 1,508
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras
I doubt VM will spend any money on a channel hardly anyone watches.
|
Ditto for Sky Atlantic. 
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:16
|
#25
|
|
RIp Sweetness
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras
It's average viewing figures, and this includes sky and vm sd and hd combined, is less than 9000. I think we all make the mistake of thinking if we like something most people do to.
Regards
John
|
Do tell where did you get your figures from? I am watching Minnesota @ USC.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:25
|
#26
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wigan
Age: 64
Posts: 486
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear
Do tell where did you get your figures from?
|
I was rather generous on the 9000 average  I got my figures from here:
http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?
You'll have to select espn america manually, as I can't get a direct link.
Regards
John.
---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDFootyMan
Ditto for Sky Atlantic.  
|
Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america
If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:31
|
#27
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras
I was rather generous on the 9000 average  I got my figures from here:
http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?
You'll have to select espy america manually, as I can't get a direct link.
Regards
John.
---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------
Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america
If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america
|
Maybe that is the reason why more people choose satellite be it through Sky or Freesat to gain access to these niche channels that VM don't deem worthy to broadcast.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:33
|
#28
|
|
RIp Sweetness
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras
I was rather generous on the 9000 average  I got my figures from here:
http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammes?
You'll have to select espy america manually, as I can't get a direct link.
Regards
John.
---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:23 ----------
Sky atlantic gets considerably more viewers than espn america
If your up for a challenge, alwaysabear, find me a channel that has lower viewing figures than espn america
|
The trouble with all Barb figures is that they are taken from so few homes that are not representative of actual viewers watching.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:36
|
#29
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wigan
Age: 64
Posts: 486
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
What has worthy got to do with it? Espn america is on virgin, they just don't want to pay extra for HD for the tiny amount of people that watch it. And I have to say I agree with that decision. Its a commercial one not a question of taste or worthiness.
Regards
John
---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by alwaysabear
The trouble with all Barb figures is that they are taken from so few homes that are not representative of actual viewers watching.
|
I think you will find they are more representative than the few tens of us that post in these threads.
|
|
|
03-09-2011, 23:43
|
#30
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
|
Re: Should Virgin introduce an HD charge
Quote:
Originally Posted by pythagoras
What has worthy got to do with it? Espn america is on virgin, they just don't want to pay extra for HD for the tiny amount of people that watch it. And I have to say I agree with that decision. Its a commercial one not a question of taste or worthiness.
Regards
John
---------- Post added at 22:36 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ----------
I think you will find they are more representative than the few tens of us that post in these threads.
|
I wasn't just referring to ESPNA HD I was meaning others such as CBS Action , CBS Drama , Al Jazeera News , Numerous music channels , Premier Sports etc.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:43.
|