Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

I really can't say anything about Google at the moment especially given new evidence which came into my possession today which I need to talk to Google lawyers about (no Google did not do anything wrong but they have been wronged) so I need to speak to them before I disclose anything on the Google front.

Just to reiterate, I am now in possession of some very important evidence regarding the 2006 trials. I will be writing an article about it shortly and I think it is going to shock even the most cynical among us.

Alexander Hanff

Now that we have established that the Police are, in fact, responsible for investigating potential RIPA 2000 breeches, it's important that they have any available evidence ASAP. Have you provided it to them already? I don't want to wait for your article (hehe) but if you need time to prepare presentation of it for the police first I think that is the legal priority and we would all understand that...

Intriguing.....!

Hank

[SelfProtection]

Originally Posted by tarka

I totally agree, I just wanted to clarify that the suggested ip address forging was not the case.

That statement would normally be true, but this assumes that "this internal network" is directing to the correct user supplied URL & not being re-routed around the network (depending on the URL), in order to add subtract data from the Web Page.

[tarka]

Originally Posted by SelfProtection

That statement would normally be true, but this assumes that "this internal network" is directing to the correct user supplied URL & not being re-routed around the network (depending on the URL), in order to add subtract data from the Web Page.

That is a very fair point, one which I hadn't considered. I would imagine that it would be possible for BT (or whichever ISP) to duplicate an IP range internally and route traffic to there instead of the real ip address (although this would only work internal to BT's network as you say). I'm not sure what purpose that would serve though and given the sites that we know are on that server I think it would be unlikely they would be doing that.

I am sure checks could be done from a BT line and non-BT line to compare the two though.

[BadPhormula]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

I really can't say anything about Google at the moment especially given new evidence which came into my possession today which I need to talk to Google lawyers about (no Google did not do anything wrong but they have been wronged) so I need to speak to them before I disclose anything on the Google front.

Just to reiterate, I am now in possession of some very important evidence regarding the 2006 trials. I will be writing an article about it shortly and I think it is going to shock even the most cynical among us.

Alexander Hanff

Okay I'm getting prepared for a shock. Practicing weighting myself down, deep breathing, 15 minute running on the spot exercises (next to PC of course so I don't miss anything)... 999 on speed dial!

practice my look

[Rchivist]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

Just to reiterate, I am now in possession of some very important evidence regarding the 2006 trials. I will be writing an article about it shortly and I think it is going to shock even the most cynical among us.

Alexander Hanff

If it doesn't shock me, does that mean I'm beyond hope?

Keep up the good work Alex and publish that article before I go on holiday won't you!?

[Anonymouse]

Just remember Karen Silkwood and Kerr-McGee, Alexander. Not that I think Phorm would have the stones to knock you off, but still...watch your six.

[Florence]

When I visited the link to startup earth I found this dated June 2nd.

http://startupearth.com/2008/06/02/p...police-action/

[Wildie]

all good press don`t you think.

[AlexanderHanff]

http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

[BadPhormula]

Originally Posted by Florence

When I visited the link to startup earth I found this dated June 2nd.

http://startupearth.com/2008/06/02/p...police-action/

I added my comments, but it is awaiting moderation

badphormula on June 4th, 2008 at 6:13 pm:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

A criminal conspiracy has been ongoing between BT (British Telecom) and 121Media (Phorm) since 2006 through to the present. They have been spying on private personal information of BT customers (more than 100,000 customers, such as Stephen Mainwaring who reported this matter to the BT and the media). The person mainly responsible for instigating this criminal act is Stratis Scleparis CTO of BT who jumped ship and joined criminal outfit 121Media (Phorm) as their CTO.

The first known illegal spying on BT customers was back in 2006, when Scleparis overlooked the “Intra-ISP Rootkit” installation, it was known to Scleparis at that time that 121Media(Phorm) was already in trouble with their illegal “PC based Rootkit” (Apropos) spying on millions of innocent victims. Scleparis advised 121Media to abandon their illegal PC based rootkit in order that they could concentrate on a more sinister spying project affecting 10’s of millions of potential victims with a rootkit they could never escape or remove, namely the “Intra-ISP rootkit” which would tap every single piece of data that passed through the ISP networks.

Btw 121Media(Phorm) spyware criminal development team is based in Moscow, Russia home of much computer based crime. The malicious code development team based in Moscow, Russia will have complete control over the “Intra-ISP rootkit” technology based in British network facilities, this illegal proprietory technology is off limits to BT’s own technical staff who manage the network, they will just have to passively sit back and hope they are not personally liable for computer misuse and wiretap interception laws.

You can follow all the latest exposure of BT/Phorm criminal activity over on BadPhorm.co.uk website and this will give you links to other websites covering this spying scandal.

The criminals in Russia (and Scleparis) will be laughing all the way to the bank as they know that the Russian constitution does not allow for criminals to be extradited to the UK for criminal prosecution. ( re: Litvinenko's killer )

[phormwatch]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

I really can't say anything about Google at the moment especially given new evidence which came into my possession today which I need to talk to Google lawyers about (no Google did not do anything wrong but they have been wronged) so I need to speak to them before I disclose anything on the Google front.

Just to reiterate, I am now in possession of some very important evidence regarding the 2006 trials. I will be writing an article about it shortly and I think it is going to shock even the most cynical among us.

Alexander Hanff

Go Alex! Go Alex! It's yer birthday! It's yer birthday!

[AlexanderHanff]

Originally Posted by phormwatch

Go Alex! Go Alex! It's yer birthday! It's yer birthday!

The first article is up, see previous post

Alexander Hanff

[JohnnyWashngo]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

Dugg

And well done on the new scoop... this is pretty much the smoking gun that many people have been waiting for.

[warescouse]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

http://nodpi.org/?p=10

Digg link at the bottom of the article.

Alexander Hanff

I can't wait to read the full document. Keep up the good work Alex. I suspect Emma may have to practice her stammer again.

[phormwatch]

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff

The first article is up, see previous post

Alexander Hanff

Excellent! More ammunition to put these crooks behind bars. Good work!