[Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
23-08-2006, 17:30
|
#211
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Druchii
Ok, it arrived yesterday, been stability testing overnight... the vDroop on this board is unreal, BIOS set to 1.45v vCore, yet at full load only hits 1.394v... That's why i found the pencil mod  - MOD HERE (anyone know where i can get conductive ink form?)
Now sitting comfortably at 3.66ghz with an Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7. No throttling (and it's turned off in the BIOS anyway) the value RAM is holding it's own at 544ish mhz (rated at only 533) and so far no problems. The x1600xt is an amazing card too. 58k points in Aquamark3 so far.
More benchies to follow, etc. |
You should be getting more than 58k, I just ran it and got 89,095.
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:35
|
#212
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
It could have something to do with my Valueram though, running it with a divider doesn't help... Looking for some good DDR2-800 that won't break the bank in a week or so.
This board has sopme major voltage issues though, blimey! Dual Priming now (affinity set to one core per instance of prime) at 3.7Ghz. Temps are at 48'C for the CPU. Not too bad.
Broke 60k in Aquamark earlier, but only just, this is a fresh install as well :/ What are you running?
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:37
|
#213
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Druchii
It could have something to do with my Valueram though, running it with a divider doesn't help... Looking for some good DDR2-800 that won't break the bank in a week or so.
This board has sopme major voltage issues though, blimey! Dual Priming now (affinity set to one core per instance of prime) at 3.7Ghz. Temps are at 48'C for the CPU. Not too bad.
Broke 60k in Aquamark earlier, but only just, this is a fresh install as well :/ What are you running?
|
A64 4000 @ 3.1ghz, X1900XT at stock, 2gb Mushkin PC3200 at stock. I reckon I could break 100K easily with a small clock on the x1900.
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:42
|
#214
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
That's why my score seems comparatively low... Aquamark3 isn't multi-threaded so dual core brings no benefits really to it, and that 4000+ cpu you have is alot more powerful than an 805 under air. Just ouch for comparing the x1600 to the x1900 as well. lol.
Still dual priming at 3.7... Lovely and stable.
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:44
|
#215
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Druchii
That's why my score seems comparatively low... Aquamark3 isn't multi-threaded so dual core brings no benefits really to it, and that 4000+ cpu you have is alot more powerful than an 805 under air. Just ouch for comparing the x1600 to the x1900 as well. lol.
Still dual priming at 3.7... Lovely and stable.
|
60K sounds about right (missed it in your previous post), not a bad score, what's your 3dM scores?
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:54
|
#216
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flobajob
60K sounds about right (missed it in your previous post), not a bad score, what's your 3dM scores?
|
3dm?
Ok, explain it, link me to the download, and give me an hour or so cos i'm still dual-priming. lol.
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:56
|
#217
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southampton
Age: 42
Posts: 1,089
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
lol yeah comparing a 12 pipe (4 real) x1600xt to a 48pipe (16 real) x1900 lol!
you've got 3x the gpu power in pipes alone let alone the 1900 runs at 625-650mhz (xt-xtx) compared to 590mhz of the x1600.
If you're only at 48c loaded you can push it some more by extra vcore. i wouldnt worry about vdroop all that much. Just set a higher initial value so that under load its what you need. When idle your cpu will throttle and be able to handle the higher voltage.
Still i'd of gone with the c2d! at 3GHz the c2d is easily a match for a dual 4ghz 900 series chip, never mind the old 800 series. Pretty much all c2d's hit mid 3G's as well.
I'd tell you what my aq3 score is if it didn't crash at the end  it will be very high.
I hit 54k in 3dm'01, 13k in '05 and 6.5k in '06 all with gpu @ stock
he means 3dmark by futurmark
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9028318
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2142627
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=416219
note most of those are slightly old as my cpu was at 3.5GHz at the time its now at 3.85GHz
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 17:58
|
#218
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Druchii
3dm?
Ok, explain it, link me to the download, and give me an hour or so cos i'm still dual-priming. lol.
|
3d Mark, futuremark.com, I think most versions have a series of CPU tests.
---------- Post added at 16:58 ---------- Previous post was at 16:58 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keithwalton
lol yeah comparing a 12 pipe (4 real) x1600xt to a 48pipe (16 real) x1900 lol!
you've got 3x the gpu power in pipes alone let alone the 1900 runs at 625-650mhz (xt-xtx) compared to 590mhz of the x1600.
If you're only at 48c loaded you can push it some more by extra vcore. i wouldnt worry about vdroop all that much. Just set a higher initial value so that under load its what you need. When idle your cpu will throttle and be able to handle the higher voltage.
Still i'd of gone with the c2d! at 3GHz the c2d is easily a match for a dual 4ghz 900 series chip, never mind the old 800 series. Pretty much all c2d's hit mid 3G's as well.
I'd tell you what my aq3 score is if it didn't crash at the end it will be very high.
I hit 54k in 3dm'01, 13k in '05 and 6.5k in '06 all with gpu @ stock
he means 3dmark by futurmark |
If AM3 is crashing, get the DLL patch for it, fixed it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 18:10
|
#219
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Good luck locating it, took me ages earlier to find the patch to stop the crash. Wait, i'll upload it here actually, simply unzip it into the am3 install folder and get going 
I'll take a look at 3dmark
---------- Post added at 17:10 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keithwalton
lol yeah comparing a 12 pipe (4 real) x1600xt to a 48pipe (16 real) x1900 lol!
you've got 3x the gpu power in pipes alone let alone the 1900 runs at 625-650mhz (xt-xtx) compared to 590mhz of the x1600.
If you're only at 48c loaded you can push it some more by extra vcore. i wouldnt worry about vdroop all that much. Just set a higher initial value so that under load its what you need. When idle your cpu will throttle and be able to handle the higher voltage.
Still i'd of gone with the c2d! at 3GHz the c2d is easily a match for a dual 4ghz 900 series chip, never mind the old 800 series. Pretty much all c2d's hit mid 3G's as well.
I'd tell you what my aq3 score is if it didn't crash at the end it will be very high.
I hit 54k in 3dm'01, 13k in '05 and 6.5k in '06 all with gpu @ stock
he means 3dmark by futurmark
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9028318
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2142627
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=416219
note most of those are slightly old as my cpu was at 3.5GHz at the time its now at 3.85GHz |
I was thinking Core2Duo to begin with, but i saved £200 not going for it, and when i haven't got the other £200 in the first place... It's the difference
Plus, i was waiting for a better motherboard, however, i can drop a C2D in this board and it work straight away OC'ing would be ok as well, as it's just a DS3 without the caps on the capacitors.
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 18:14
|
#220
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keithwalton
lol yeah comparing a 12 pipe (4 real) x1600xt to a 48pipe (16 real) x1900 lol!
you've got 3x the gpu power in pipes alone let alone the 1900 runs at 625-650mhz (xt-xtx) compared to 590mhz of the x1600.
If you're only at 48c loaded you can push it some more by extra vcore. i wouldnt worry about vdroop all that much. Just set a higher initial value so that under load its what you need. When idle your cpu will throttle and be able to handle the higher voltage.
Still i'd of gone with the c2d! at 3GHz the c2d is easily a match for a dual 4ghz 900 series chip, never mind the old 800 series. Pretty much all c2d's hit mid 3G's as well.
I'd tell you what my aq3 score is if it didn't crash at the end it will be very high.
I hit 54k in 3dm'01, 13k in '05 and 6.5k in '06 all with gpu @ stock
he means 3dmark by futurmark
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9028318
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2142627
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=416219
note most of those are slightly old as my cpu was at 3.5GHz at the time its now at 3.85GHz |
That's some nice scores right there. Does the Core 2 make a noticeable difference? (I'm waiting on stock for a 6600 still )
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 19:25
|
#221
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keithwalton
lol yeah comparing a 12 pipe (4 real) x1600xt to a 48pipe (16 real) x1900 lol!
you've got 3x the gpu power in pipes alone let alone the 1900 runs at 625-650mhz (xt-xtx) compared to 590mhz of the x1600.
If you're only at 48c loaded you can push it some more by extra vcore. i wouldnt worry about vdroop all that much. Just set a higher initial value so that under load its what you need. When idle your cpu will throttle and be able to handle the higher voltage.
Still i'd of gone with the c2d! at 3GHz the c2d is easily a match for a dual 4ghz 900 series chip, never mind the old 800 series. Pretty much all c2d's hit mid 3G's as well.
I'd tell you what my aq3 score is if it didn't crash at the end it will be very high.
I hit 54k in 3dm'01, 13k in '05 and 6.5k in '06 all with gpu @ stock
he means 3dmark by futurmark
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9028318
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2142627
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=416219
note most of those are slightly old as my cpu was at 3.5GHz at the time its now at 3.85GHz |
Yeah, but i have a bigger cock (im fattening him up for christmas - turkey sucks)!
(too riskey?   )
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 19:53
|
#222
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southampton
Age: 42
Posts: 1,089
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
aha thanks for the patch. Attached is my score
gpu @ stock.
and yes the c2d makes a big difference. My Pentium D 930 @ 4GHz is utterly blown out of the water, especially 3dmark 01 where the score is some 10k higher. But in 05 and 06 the cpu score is also alot higher. In '05 a 4.5GHz 900 series can just hit 11k cpu score. Something beaten by the c2d at 3.2GHz
|
|
|
|
|
23-08-2006, 22:01
|
#223
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBlueRaja
Yeah, but i have a bigger cock (im fattening him up for christmas - turkey sucks)!
(too riskey? ) |
No, but you wrote "have" instead of "am"
---------- Post added at 21:01 ---------- Previous post was at 20:59 ----------
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by keithwalton
aha thanks for the patch. Attached is my score
gpu @ stock.
and yes the c2d makes a big difference. My Pentium D 930 @ 4GHz is utterly blown out of the water, especially 3dmark 01 where the score is some 10k higher. But in 05 and 06 the cpu score is also alot higher. In '05 a 4.5GHz 900 series can just hit 11k cpu score. Something beaten by the c2d at 3.2GHz |
What C2D are you running, is it on air/water/phase?
|
|
|
|
|
24-08-2006, 00:24
|
#224
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southampton
Age: 42
Posts: 1,089
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Flobajob
What C2D are you running, is it on air/water/phase?
|
E6700 but that doesn't really matter the E6600 clocks just as well.
Was air cooled with a Zalman 9500-AT, it could do 3.5GHz solid and was benchmark stable at 3.7GHz
Its now under water cooling which has made it stable at 3.73GHz and will bench at 3.85GHz but to go much faster rapidly needs more voltage and my waterblock just isnt upto the job
|
|
|
|
|
24-08-2006, 02:55
|
#225
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
|
Re: [Merged] 4.1 Ghz Dual Core Pentium 805 Monster
Not sure how good or bad this is, but the pictures pretty much speak for themselves.
SuperPi 1m in 37.734sec @ 3.66ghz
SuperPi 32m in 32mins 48.266secs @ 3.66Ghz
Dual Prime stable for 9hours at 3.56ghz.
Nice, basically.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:54.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
