[Merged] BB Speed Upgrades - Page 75

Stuart · 15-08-2004, 13:43

Are you on a 1 Meg connection through a Set Top Box? If so, that's why. No 1 Meg STB users have been upgraded yet.

Scotianet · 15-08-2004, 19:37

Anyone know if the renfrewshire/Inverclyde area has been upgraded as of yet.... I believe someone has had theres updated but mines is still the same...

stevo_125 · 15-08-2004, 20:01

thanks SMharman & JTWN

xb00t · 16-08-2004, 00:17

Oooooh, yeaaaah! 93,75k baby, soon I'll make it 187,5k!!!

squiggs1982 · 16-08-2004, 02:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scotianet

Anyone know if the renfrewshire/Inverclyde area has been upgraded as of yet.... I believe someone has had theres updated but mines is still the same...

After being pointed in this direction by MattD, I can confirm that I'm still on my 600k connection and I live in Renfrew. Hope it's done soon

Ramrod · 16-08-2004, 09:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by slysy

The postcode checker shows I have been upgraded but speed tests show otherwise, anyone else had this problem?

Yep, me

......sort of...:

Quote:

Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:49:48 UTC
1st 128K took 1071 ms = 122383 Bytes/sec = approx 1018 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1082 ms = 121139 Bytes/sec = approx 1008 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1412 ms = 92827 Bytes/sec = approx 772 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 701 ms = 186979 Bytes/sec = approx 1556 kbits/sec

Quote:

Originally Posted by scastle

Are you on a 1 Meg connection through a Set Top Box? If so, that's why. No 1 Meg STB users have been upgraded yet.

How come I'm getting bursts of 1.5mb activity?

Quote:

Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:52:14 UTC
1st 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1061 ms = 123536 Bytes/sec = approx 1028 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1402 ms = 93489 Bytes/sec = approx 778 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 841 ms = 155853 Bytes/sec = approx 1297 kbits/sec

Quote:

Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:53:28 UTC
1st 128K took 1091 ms = 120139 Bytes/sec = approx 1000 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1092 ms = 120029 Bytes/sec = approx 999 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1302 ms = 100670 Bytes/sec = approx 838 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 821 ms = 159649 Bytes/sec = approx 1328 kbits/sec

Rone · 16-08-2004, 09:57

Cos its cr@p like mine.

Thats just what i,m getting atm .

Stuart · 16-08-2004, 10:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

How come I'm getting bursts of 1.5mb activity?

Don't know. All I know is that BBKing says no 1mb users on stb have been upgraded yet.

Ramrod · 16-08-2004, 10:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by scastle

Don't know. All I know is that BBKing says no 1mb users on stb have been upgraded yet.

Anywhere in the entire country?
edit---can't be:

Quote:

staffords done
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:36:40 UTC
1st 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...postcount=1036

16-08-2004, 10:50

Mine seems to have settled down now, lovely double the speed 35kb/s downloads, bring on the uploads!

jtwn · 16-08-2004, 14:12

Quote:

Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:52:14 UTC
1st 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1061 ms = 123536 Bytes/sec = approx 1028 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1402 ms = 93489 Bytes/sec = approx 778 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 841 ms = 155853 Bytes/sec = approx 1297 kbits/sec

Quote:
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:53:28 UTC
1st 128K took 1091 ms = 120139 Bytes/sec = approx 1000 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1092 ms = 120029 Bytes/sec = approx 999 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1302 ms = 100670 Bytes/sec = approx 838 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 821 ms = 159649 Bytes/sec = approx 1328 kbits/sec

I used to get that sometimes with rdhw's speed test, i always found that the if the results before was a bit lower and the next higher the difference of the higher to the normal speed always was the extra needed for the lower speed...if you get my drift

Dodgy

Ramrod · 16-08-2004, 14:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtwn

I used to get that sometimes with rdhw's speed test, i always found that the if the results before was a bit lower and the next higher the difference of the higher to the normal speed always was the extra needed for the lower speed...if you get my drift

Dodgy

Thats exactly what I'm getting. Whats going on?

IceColdMan · 16-08-2004, 14:27

yeah i have been upgraded and I found out of my mate father who works for NTL that to get it upgragded I have to pull the power lead out of the back on my broadband box

Ramrod · 16-08-2004, 14:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceColdMan

yeah i have been upgraded and I found out of my mate father who works for NTL that to get it upgragded I have to pull the power lead out of the back on my broadband box

I have tried rebooting my stb a few times. Did it work for you?
btw....welcome to nthw/cableforum

SMHarman · 16-08-2004, 14:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

I have tried rebooting my stb a few times. Did it work for you?
btw....welcome to nthw/cableforum

SACMs will respond to the upgraded speed with a reboot, the theory on here at the moment is that STBs will not respond to a speed increase until all the STBs in the Area, Country, World (as appropriate) have been changed to Samsung ones.

(This is for the 1Mb service, 150-300 will see little difference on an STB as it was really 256-300, 600>750 should be done if your area says so, but all Pace STBs cannot cope with bandwidth above 1Mb so are being swapped out).