Mum had sex with son

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Jerrek

Gay people can get married. Find a nice girl (if you're a guy) and marry her. Equal rights.

I do also support repealing all special treatment given to married couples though. Anyone can use the words civil union, but the word marriage is reserved for one man and one woman, by definition.


No. I wrestle and do some martial arts since I was 5 and know how to beat the daylights out of someone. What does this have to do with the subject at hand?

The reason i asked was that you don't seem to know what you want. In this thread you don`t want the government to legislate on moral issues yet in other threads you want the government to ban gay marriage!

But ha ho back to the topic at hand.

Originally Posted by Jerrek

You are making a Burden of Proof error. It is not up to us to show it is acceptable, but up to you to show it isn't.

Rubbish. Where did you dream up that rule from?

[Jerrek]

Originally Posted by Mick

Rubbish. Where did you dream up that rule from?

So you're saying every single action a man can possibly do should be illegal, until proven it is acceptable?

Yeah. That will work.

Originally Posted by Jerrek

So you're saying every single action a man can possibly do should be illegal, until proven it is acceptable?

Yeah. That will work.

What on Earth are you babbling on about? We are talking about the sexual activity here between a mother and son. Mothers do not have sex with their children and children do not have sex with their parents, no matter how old they are or what freedoms they have, you may find it acceptable, but I think its bloody sick.

[Jerrek]

Originally Posted by Mick

What on Earth are you babbling on about? We are talking about the sexual activity here between a mother and son. Mothers do not have sex with their children and children do not have sex with their parents, no matter how old they are or what freedoms they have, you may find it acceptable, but I think its bloody sick.

And because King Mick feels it is sick it should be illegal?

[Russ]

Originally Posted by Jerrek

HOW HARD CAN IT BE TO UNDERSTAND IT?

Don't get lippy with me, 'sunshine'. I'm asking you to explain why in one instance you say anyone can get married whereas in the next you state that marriage by definition is for a man and a woman.

[Pierre]

Jerrek has always made his position clear on these subject- I remember from a thread several months ago.

As I remember Jerrek believes that any kind of sex (and marriage) between two consenting adults, no matter their relationship, should be a matter for them, and them alone.

I don't have a problem with the first view point. As long as no innocent 3rd parties are involved.

The marrriage thing.........Nah

[downquark1]

Originally Posted by Jerrek

HOW HARD CAN IT BE TO UNDERSTAND IT?

Straight guy scenario: StraightGuy01 marries Woman01.
Gay guy scenario: GayGuy01 marries Woman02.

See? Anyone can get married. Nothing prevents a gay guy from marrying a woman. Nothing.

What prevents the government allowing same sex married couples??? Is it a recieved morality?

Fine then, a mother is free to have sex with anyone but her son

[Russ]

Originally Posted by downquark1

What prevents the government allowing same sex married couples??? Is it a recieved morality?

It's because they still believe traditional 'family values' to be the best option.

[orangebird]

Originally Posted by Jerrek

And because King Mick feels it is sick it should be illegal?

It's not just 'King Mick' that thinks it sick, 'Sick Puppy Jerrek'.... As on this thread, it seems everone but you thinks so too. And laws are made to benefit the majority...

Originally Posted by Graham

Again we hear that it's "not acceptable", but again we don't hear any reasons *why*!

If it is between two consenting adults and *not* for procreation (although see my post just above) *WHY* is it "not acceptable"??

That's a very narrow point of view.What if the couple decide to have children?Because that's what loving couples do is it not?

Originally Posted by orangebird

It's not just 'King Mick' that thinks it sick, 'Sick Puppy Jerrek'.... As on this thread, it seems everone but you thinks so too. And laws are made to benefit the majority...

Are they now? Assuming that in this instance everything was done with consent, how exactly are you being protected by this prosecution?

Originally Posted by Incognitas

That's a very narrow point of view.What if the couple decide to have children?Because that's what loving couples do is it not?

Apart from all those couples who actively decide that they aren`t going to have children. I know plenty of couples who have adopted that stance.

Originally Posted by Jerrek

You are making a Burden of Proof error. It is not up to us to show it is acceptable, but up to you to show it isn't. You don't make certain acts illegal and then place the burden of proof on people to prove that it shouldn't be illegal, rather, you must justify when you blatantly revoke a person's freedoms.

What absolute tosh. The mass majority believe it unacceptable, therefore it is up to you to show it is acceptable.

Of course, you cannot, so you just bluster that it is not up to you.

Originally Posted by dr wadd

Apart from all those couples who actively decide that they aren`t going to have children. I know plenty of couples who have adopted that stance.

Yes but are they all committing incest?Let's stick to the topic please.