Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Symantec attack?

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Computers & IT > Security & Virus Discussion

Symantec attack?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-05-2004, 20:58   #1
rovert
Inactive
 
rovert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Yorkshire(Kirklees)
Age: 75
Services: Ex VM now P.O. BB & phone, Freeview.
Posts: 95
rovert is on a distinguished roadrovert is on a distinguished road
Question Symantec attack?

Have been experiencing problems with my pc since switching on yesterday when a message popped up to say "Some Symantec product settings have been changed by an unauthorized program". I have Norton Internet Security 2003 installed and the message went on to recommend I uninstalled and then reinstalled it. I did this with a great deal of difficulty due to constant crashing. However only antivirus is now present with the firewall being disabled and no option to turn it back on. I have run a virus scan using the downloaded norton checker but nothing was found.

I am using Windows ME with IE6 although some sites needing secure connection advise that I am on IE5 and should update to the latest encrypted version. About IE confirms version is 6.0.

Whilst my pc is definitely more stable several things, including the above, are not operating correctly. Windows update refuses to scan for updates indicating that a problem has occurred. The symantec website refuses to load up its online support assistant so I cannot report my problems to them. I have been told that flash player is needed although I already have the latest version of flash.

Has anyone else experienced such problems or can anyone suggest a likely cause?

Thanks
rovert is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 12-05-2004, 20:59   #2
Ramrod
Inactive
 
Ramrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
Ramrod has a golden aura
Ramrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden auraRamrod has a golden aura
Re: Symantec attack?

Do one of the online scans?
Ramrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 21:04   #3
Chris W
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reading
Age: 42
Services: Virgin Media Broadband Size M
Posts: 6,546
Chris W has a nice shiny star
Chris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to Chris W
Re: Symantec attack?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rovert

I am using Windows ME with IE6 although some sites needing secure connection advise that I am on IE5 and should update to the latest encrypted version. About IE confirms version is 6.0.
this suggests that the cypher strength is not 128bit, check this in about IE, if it is less than 128 use the update information link and it will take you to the m$ page there to download the patch for it.

i will pass on the AV issues ATM (my brain hurts ) but just second what Ramrod has said- run an online scan, try http://housecall.trendmicro.com/

MB
Chris W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2004, 21:11   #4
rovert
Inactive
 
rovert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Yorkshire(Kirklees)
Age: 75
Services: Ex VM now P.O. BB & phone, Freeview.
Posts: 95
rovert is on a distinguished roadrovert is on a distinguished road
Re: Symantec attack?

Thanks - now trying Panda ActiveScan to hopefully get to the bottom of it. Bit worried though at lack of firewall.
rovert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 16:10   #5
rovert
Inactive
 
rovert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Yorkshire(Kirklees)
Age: 75
Services: Ex VM now P.O. BB & phone, Freeview.
Posts: 95
rovert is on a distinguished roadrovert is on a distinguished road
Re: Symantec attack?

Panda virus scan indicated no infections found. About IE confirms IE6 with 128 bit encryption but still unable to connect to secure sites. Have downloaded and installed Mozilla Firefox browser but now get error message " The connection was refused when attempting to contact www.mozilla.org" Mozilla forum suggests this problem is firewall related but Norton still apparently disabled. Any ideas?
Cheers
rovert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 16:35   #6
Chris W
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reading
Age: 42
Services: Virgin Media Broadband Size M
Posts: 6,546
Chris W has a nice shiny star
Chris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to Chris W
Re: Symantec attack?

to fix the secure sites problem, try the fixes mentioned here:

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=813444

the article is about winXP, so everything upto the last four steps is applicaple, but those will not.

Does it affect all secure sites or just some? if it is just some sites then it may be your proxy server, try specifying a differnet on in tools -> internet options -> connections -> lan settings. Try 62.255.0.5 on port 8080 because i know this one is working fine ATM.

IIRC the symantec site uses and ActiveX plugin; these maybe disabled in the internet options... check in internet options -> security -> custom level.

If there are problems with firewall/AV it seems like this is blocking new programs from accessing the internet, hence why mozilla cannot connect. Try uninstalling NIS again and then after a reboot run a program like reg cleaner. If everything is then working ok, try reinstalling NIS again.

hth
MB
Chris W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 16:42   #7
iadom
In the corner, sulking.
 
iadom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,041
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
Re: Symantec attack?

There have also been very recent warnings in the past 2 days about serious flaws in Norton AV. Have you got the latest patches from Symantec as well as the latest deffiles.
Paul has already posted a thread about this, more news here.
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news...le.php/3353841
iadom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 19:07   #8
rovert
Inactive
 
rovert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Yorkshire(Kirklees)
Age: 75
Services: Ex VM now P.O. BB & phone, Freeview.
Posts: 95
rovert is on a distinguished roadrovert is on a distinguished road
Re: Symantec attack?

Thanks monkeybreath and iadom for your advice. When I checked LAN settings I found no address for secure server. After entering address and port suggested by MB I was able to access secure sites which were causing problems including goldfish which had been recommending upgrade to IE6! I have also used windows update finding 2 critical updates which I had not been aware of in spite of using automatic update option.
As far as Symantec is concerned I have now been able to run a check with their Automated Support Assistant which says I have an old version of Live Update. Although the necessary file seemed to download without problem the live update installer would not run to complete the installation. Looks like a full reinstall might be needed although zonealarm looks temting at present!
Still no joy with Mozilla Firefox (connection refused) but at least Internet Explorer working better.
Thanks again.
rovert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 21:05   #9
TheBlueRaja
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 50
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
Re: Symantec attack?

Zonealarm, from personal experience is not recommended. I would stick with Norton.

ZoneAlarm seems to interfere too much with your normal net connection and caused me problems which i didnt expect to be related to the firewall.

just a bit of friendly advice, by all means give it a try and see what you think, just keep Norton close to hand.
TheBlueRaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2004, 21:15   #10
iadom
In the corner, sulking.
 
iadom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,041
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
Re: Symantec attack?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theblueraja
Zonealarm, from personal experience is not recommended. I would stick with Norton.

ZoneAlarm seems to interfere too much with your normal net connection and caused me problems which i didnt expect to be related to the firewall.

just a bit of friendly advice, by all means give it a try and see what you think, just keep Norton close to hand.
Horses for courses. I have had no problems whatsoever with ZA Pro, used it for over 4 years now. It does take a bit of tweaking to get it just right, but most of the time I don't even notice its there .
iadom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2004, 10:11   #11
rovert
Inactive
 
rovert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: West Yorkshire(Kirklees)
Age: 75
Services: Ex VM now P.O. BB & phone, Freeview.
Posts: 95
rovert is on a distinguished roadrovert is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Re: Symantec attack?

Pleased to report that after full uninstall of Norton Internet Security 2003 and reinstall, normal service has been resumed!
Thanks to all who offered advice on this problem.
rovert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2004, 10:45   #12
Maggy
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Mod
 
Maggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 74
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,379
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Re: Symantec attack?

Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Horses for courses. I have had no problems whatsoever with ZA Pro, used it for over 4 years now. It does take a bit of tweaking to get it just right, but most of the time I don't even notice its there .
Hear,hear.The only problem I have with ZA Pro is Teenager related!!!

Incog.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
Maggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05.


Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum