sex education for 5 year olds

[kronas]

so called 'experts' have recommended that children from 5 years old should be taught sex education the scheme would not go in to too much detail but would start with basics so that the child would understand

but family and youth group concern say that its a form of 'child abuse' which would rob them of there 'innocence'

my opinion i think its too early 10-13 years old is the ideal time IMO for them to be taught as children especailly taking in to account girls mature faster then boys they should learn the pitfalls of certain 'actions' they make take

but most schools brush the idea aside of sex ed and not teach the 'real' issues youngsters can face........

It's a really difficult issue. We plan to have our son grow up sort of always having known about sex in one way or another, just learning more as he grows up. I think the right place for him to learn this is at home, from us.

Sadly some parents don't take responsibility for their own kids' well-being - everything is someone else's problem, whether it's the school, the doctor, the government, whatever ... they look to everyone but themselves.

If these people took responsibility for their own kids, there would be no need to suggest doing sex ed in classes for 5-year-olds.

[Lord Nikon]

My own opinion is this... If a child is old enough to ask questions, then it is old enough to be told. How much it is told depends on age / maturity and for this part, each child is different.

[kronas]

Originally posted by towny

Sadly some parents don't take responsibility for their own kids' well-being - everything is someone else's problem, whether it's the school, the doctor, the government, whatever ... they look to everyone but themselves.

yes parents dont take the blame because they expect the school to teach them or have no interest in the matter they are too busy to realise whats going on or there is an avoidance on the issue

Originally posted by Lord Nikon
My own opinion is this... If a child is old enough to ask questions, then it is old enough to be told. How much it is told depends on age / maturity and for this part, each child is different.

i agree if a child asks questions with regards to sex then they should be answered with the correct information rather then be a told a fairy story

[BubbleGum]

Children should learn how to read and write and how to count. Children should have fun, drawing and building things and playing with their friends. Children as young as 5 shouldn't be learning about sex but maybe the adult 'experts' that kronas mentions need to learn about sex.

[Ramrod]

Originally posted by Bluetack
maybe the adult 'experts' need to learn about sex. [/B]

You mean they should fu*k off?
........I agree

Originally posted by kronas
so called 'experts' have recommended that children from 5 years old should be taught sex education

First of all, for those interested in this discussion, one take on the story can be seen at: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homea...996066,00.html

Now it seems that kronas has taken an "anti" position to this story because of his expression "so called" and putting "experts" in quotes, thus calling into question their expertise and knowledge from the start.

However these people are actually the Independent Advisory Group on Teenage Pregnancy, this group, quoting from http://www.doh.gov.uk/teenagepregnan...ovresponse.pdf

"[...] was established in 2000, as part of the Strategyââ‚à ƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢s action plan. Its terms of reference are to provide advice to Government and monitor the success of its Strategy towards achieving the headline goals. There are 30 members in the Group, appointed in accordance with the Nolan rules for Non-Departmental Public Bodies, and drawn from a wide range of individuals and organisations with experience of working with teenagers and teenage parents."

This rather implies that these people *are* reasonably qualified to be called "experts" and probably have some idea of what they are talking about.

Of course the writer of story itself doesn't help because they say that sex education for under fives will be "demanded", when I think the word "suggested" would be more appropriate.

> the scheme would not go in to too much detail but would start with basics so that the child would understand

but family and youth group concern say that its a form of 'child abuse' which would rob them of there 'innocence'

Which is a wonderful sound bite response from that group because it contains the loaded expression "child abuse" which will cause instant negative reactions amongst wide areas of the population and which is very difficult to counter without lots of explanation which will cause most people to switch off very quickly.

my opinion i think its too early 10-13 years old is the ideal time IMO for them to be taught as children especailly taking in to account girls mature faster then boys they should learn the pitfalls of certain 'actions' they make take

I would agree with this up to a point, however the report fails to emphasise that it's not just "sex" which is suggested be taught, but *relationships* which is a whole different matter.

Mostly children and teenagers find out about relationships by sheer trial and error and I think that teaching children how to relate to other people (and not just in a "sex" way) is something that *should* be taught to them as soon as possible because not only would it help cut down on teenage pregnancies, but also on abusive relationships etc.

IMO children need to be taught about sex *before* puberty, since by the time they get there they already have formed ideas and opinions based on stuff they've picked up from the playground or on TV etc and it's starting to be too late by that time.

but most schools brush the idea aside of sex ed and not teach the 'real' issues youngsters can face........

I think it's more a case that the schools are so loaded down with the amount of stuff in the National Curriculum they already have to deal with that they just don't feel they can spare the time to deal with all this as well, and that's just down to the Government being willing to spend more money on Education which they promised in the first place.

[kronas]

Originally posted by Graham
First of all, for those interested in this discussion, one take on the story can be seen at: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homea...996066,00.html

Now it seems that kronas has taken an "anti" position to this story because of his expression "so called" and putting "experts" in quotes, thus calling into question their expertise and knowledge from the start.

However these people are actually the Independent Advisory Group on Teenage Pregnancy, this group, quoting from http://www.doh.gov.uk/teenagepregnan...ovresponse.pdf

i am anti this idea and was being sarcastic but i did show the full picture

your links shows me type of beaurocratic BS we have come to expect from the goverment all talk no action

Originally posted by Graham

I would agree with this up to a point, however the report fails to emphasise that it's not just "sex" which is suggested be taught, but *relationships* which is a whole different matter.

Mostly children and teenagers find out about relationships by sheer trial and error and I think that teaching children how to relate to other people (and not just in a "sex" way) is something that *should* be taught to them as soon as possible because not only would it help cut down on teenage pregnancies, but also on abusive relationships etc.

IMO children need to be taught about sex *before* puberty, since by the time they get there they already have formed ideas and opinions based on stuff they've picked up from the playground or on TV etc and it's starting to be too late by that time.

DUH thats stating the obvious with regards to the relationship bit and everything else i dont think the users on this forum need to be told that as im sure they are clever enough to work that one out well i sure did but did not include it in my post

so hows this i had relativly little had little education im my high school years so i missed out on a lot of things sex ed was one no one told/taught me about sex or relationships but i fully understand everything an how to interact with a person not just sexually but buliding freindship as just freinds as you will meet that special person and you wont know what hit you

Originally posted by Graham

I think it's more a case that the schools are so loaded down with the amount of stuff in the National Curriculum they already have to deal with that they just don't feel they can spare the time to deal with all this as well, and that's just down to the Government being willing to spend more money on Education which they promised in the first place.

i dont think so the amount of english and maths that was drilled in to me at my school it was totally OTT GEOGRAPHY IT PE were rare as was MUSIC better management of timetables could improve education if the teachers are there which sadly is not the case most schools shun sex ed to the side in case parents are against it

[Ramrod]

These 'experts', are they the same ones who today decided (after 30 years of saying the opposit) that boys do need to engage in rough-and-tumble and games with guns?

so what are we going to call it- sex education, relationship management - street-wise studies, maybe.

I agree pre-puberty knowledge of the consequences of sex is important.

I thought you were a little hard on kronas, I think a lot of people are concerned at the influence "experts" have, these days. Not to deny their credentials, but not all are in touch with the hoi polloi. You also failed to comment on his point that questions should be answered truthfully - hardly an "anti" stance?

but, also, the fact is the street teaches our kids before we do and I welcome any initiative to redress that

I just don't think calling it "sex education" is right - it's more than that -imo

Originally posted by Ramrod
These 'experts', are they the same ones who today decided (after 30 years of saying the opposit) that boys do need to engage in rough-and-tumble and games with guns?

What, at last the 'experts' acknowledge what the rest of the world has always known?

I find it hard not to immediately dislike anyone who calls themself an 'expert' in anything...

[Martin]

For goodness sake I was playing out on my bike and a quick peck on the cheek at 16!!! Now girls at 12 are having babies. I think things have gone mad, these things shouldn't be happening. I don't think educating them will work out. Kids should be enjoying there youth, not out having sex. Plenty of time for that later. Kids are old before there time these days without having the pressure of going out to work.

[Xaccers]

When I were a lad, we had other things to do, that gave us a childhood, like a stream to dam, and trees to climb, we had parks with swings and climbing frames and see-saws and even slides!
Then the council came in and flattened the parks, and the media came along and told our parents that there were suddenly terrible scary men in the woods.

These days, I don't know how kids can have a childhood full of fun and play.
Parents are too scared to let them play out, not that there's anywhere other than the street for them to play.

[Martin]

Yep you have a point there Xaccers, times have changed. For the worst in many ways. I always get slated for saying about the good old days but they really where fun times.

Originally posted by Xaccers
When I were a lad, we had other things to do, that gave us a childhood, like a stream to dam, and trees to climb, we had parks with swings and climbing frames and see-saws and even slides!
Then the council came in and flattened the parks, and the media came along and told our parents that there were suddenly terrible scary men in the woods.

These days, I don't know how kids can have a childhood full of fun and play.
Parents are too scared to let them play out, not that there's anywhere other than the street for them to play.

with you there Xaccers

remember the Witches Hat?