Need some advice

As some of you know i am having a hard time with an assignment at the moment, and may have had a great idea for it. But i need a bit of advice from people out there whether it is a good idea or not.

The question of the assignment is:


For a product or service category of your choice, analyse the behaviour of consumers in terms of relevant behavioural theories and concepts. The choice of topic may be as narrow or as wide as you choose (i.e. A box of Dairy Milk Chocolates vs. the confectionery market). Whatever topic you choose, you must be confident that you are able to relate it to relative consumer behaviour material covered over the course of the year.

Now i have had an idea to do the Labour party, as this, as i think it will be pretty interesting, and not many people will do this.

Does anyone agree that the Labour party is a service and a brand, and would be a viable choice to do the assignment on.

Come on all you brainy people, giz a hand

[Ramrod]

I don't know what the "relative consumer behaviour material covered over the course of the year" is. So I can't give an opinion

[paulyoung666]

ummmmmmmmmmmmm i think you might be pushing it going this way , my opinion only of course


what about using one of the oil companies such as shell or esso




then again i might be a total and know nothing

Originally Posted by Ramrod

I don't know what the "relative consumer behaviour material covered over the course of the year" is. So I can't give an opinion

Yeah i know what you mean, and it would obviously be very hard to go through them now. But do you agree that the labour party is a service/brand, therefore viable for the assignment question. i.e

For a product or service category of your choice, analyse the behaviour of consumers in terms of relevant behavioural theories and concepts. The choice of topic may be as narrow or as wide as you choose (i.e. A box of Dairy Milk Chocolates vs. the confectionery market).

[danielf]

Originally Posted by col d

Yeah i know what you mean, and it would obviously be very hard to go through them now. But do you agree that the labour party is a dervice/brand, therefore viable for the assignment question. i.e

I think you might be biting off a bit more than you can chew. People's voting behaviour is likely to be influenced by a lot of factors, so your analysis is likely to be overly simplistic.

It might be better to choose a subject that is influenced by fewer factors. That way you don't have to take too much into consideration, and can dwell longer on things you do consider?

Originally Posted by paulyoung666

ummmmmmmmmmmmm i think you might be pushing it going this way , my opinion only of course


what about using one of the oil companies such as shell or esso




then again i might be a total and know nothing

Yeah i know, that is why i am very hesitant, but looking at it in theory, i can see that a lot of consumer behaviour theories were used during the 1997 and 2001 elections. Also, when i was talking to the lecturer about my subject, she said she hated reading practically the same assignment again and again. You see i was orginally going to do minidisc vs cd players, but could not find a lot of information. Ahhhhh, i wish i never got this in my head now

Originally Posted by danielf

I think you might be biting off a bit more than you can chew.

I know, thats what i'm scared of. But you know when you get an idea in your head, and it sort of snowballs

Originally Posted by danielf

People's voting behaviour is likely to be influenced by a lot of factors, so your analysis is likely to be overly simplistic.

It might be better to choose a subject that is influenced by fewer factors. That way you don't have to take too much into consideration, and can dwell longer on things you do consider?

Yeah, another good point

[iadom]

Why not NTL, plenty of research material here.

[danielf]

Originally Posted by col d

I know, thats what i'm scared of. But you know when you get an idea in your head, and it sort of snowballs



Yeah, another good point

How about simplifying things a little, but keep it an interesting subject for the lecturer. Rather than a political party, what about a charity? Perhaps one close to your heart? I think the same type of analysis might apply, but you can narrow it down a bit more?

I think you need to come up with something that is interesting, but still allows you to do the complexity of the subject justice.

[aliferste]

Coming from someone who is in the middle of essays at the moment......choose the easiest thing possible!

Originally Posted by aliferste

Coming from someone who is in the middle of essays at the moment......choose the easiest thing possible!

i know what you mean mate. But i really want to get a good mark in this.

Right. I have made a decision, cause as i said once i get an idea in my head, it sort of snowballs.

Been looking around the internet to see its a viable subject or not, and honestly think it is.

I will explain a little bit (maybe just to sort it out in my head). I cannot use all theories of consumer behaviour as some basically just dont apply, and that is not what is required. I can use some theories though, and write a good deal about them. For instance, one theory is

Semiotics:-
Semiotics is basically Signs or image. Consumers choose products based on their self-image and therefore, peopleââ‚Ã⠀šÃ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢s possessions should reflect part of their personality.

The labour party used this when changing the red rose to the 'cross my heart'. Even the change in image of the party, kinnock to Blair, Labour to New labour etc.

Sorry to keep boring you, but this is helping me.

Another thory is the Decision-making process. I.e Need Recognition/Problem Awareness. In the election people recognised the need for change in the country, with a lot of things. The scandle of the troies. NHS and Education, and people did change parties. Thats why there was a landslide.

There are more, but this post is getting on a bit. Can people see what i'm saying, for am i just wearing blinkers as i have this idea in my head.

Once again, sorry for boring you, but this is pretty important to me

[MovedGoalPosts]

The Labour party, as with any political party, can probably be argued to be a "brand", but i'm not sure they are also a service. At least I'm not sure that a large proportion of voters would see any political party as a service, government may utimatley provide a service to the population, but do political parties provide services?

As for relative consumer behaviiour material, we have no idea what is being covered by your course, presumably some form of economics or business studies?

Having said that consumers, in the ususal sense, usually implies purchase of something. Do we purchase from a political party. Probably not, but if you could argue that voters influence decisions of politicians as to what services they provide, at what cost in taxes and so on, then you might be on to something?

[danielf]

Originally Posted by col d

i know what you mean mate. But i really want to get a good mark in this.

<snip>

Yeah, it kind of makes sense to me, but I think you will need to delineate at the outset what you will and will not cover, so perhaps just discuss how need recognition/problem awareness may (or may not) explain voter's behaviour in that one election. And be sure to dedicate a section to how you're obviously simplifying things, but your eassay is simply about the strengths and weaknesses of this one theory in explaining the facts. (Unless they want you to cover several theories). Might be best to check that with the lecturer?

[Ramrod]

I'm not sure if (while the labour party is a brand) we are consumers of that brand. Consumers have a choice and can buy something else, we have no choice in the matter (while they are in power).

consumer

\Con*sum"er\, n. One who, or that which, consumes; as, the consumer of food.

consumer

n : a person who uses goods or services

I'm not sure we consume or use goods or servises that the labour party supplies. We just do as we are told.

yeah, we have a choice. Vote this part or this party, or this party. Or not vote at all.

As with the purchasing, this can apply, for instance. A lot of us don't personally pay for services like hospitals, education, police even bin men, but they do come out of our taxes. The same for government, us voting is the same as placing £100 on the counter and saying "i'll 'ave that one please"

I do understand that one of the hardest thing in politics is what underlines voting tendencies and decision-making, but this is the same for marketing, and i'm pretty sure i can connect the 2

I know that i am talking to you about this when you are blind about the theories of Marketing, but one of the best ways of knowing if an assignment is good, is to talk about to someone who does not know the subject. If they understand your points, then it could be a good one