super pi database

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 20:54

Anyone know of a place to look for cpu's running super pi at stock ?

I got 29s 1M for an E6400@stock seems a little off to me

Overall must say the machine has benched 'OK' nothing great as expected.

Windows run better but still have that little clunk clink lag you get when you open windows dont get that with linux.

Hopefully after benching a bit more with windows I'll get back to the real world and linux.... It just disrespectful to all this wonderful hardware to be spoiling it by running windows

22-11-2006, 20:56

what ram you using? remember ddrII has very poor latency

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 21:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb

what ram you using? remember ddrII has very poor latency

ddr : latency is good I tested with sis sandra but bandwidth is poor as expected

Here are some comparable super pi results but they are from machine that are o/c'd

http://overclockers.at/cpudb.php?783...c&pagenumber=2

22-11-2006, 21:14

of course it is your on the asrock how quickly I forget

I score 21 secs at stock

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 21:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb

of course it is your on the asrock how quickly I forget

I score 21 secs at stock

Looks like an E6400@stock is around 28-29s

What process and speed are you on mate ?

22-11-2006, 21:21

just back at stock I want to sell this board and chip in the new and buy a quadro

(no one else will buy me one sobsob lol process?

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 21:24

what processor and what speed is it running at ?

DocDutch · 22-11-2006, 21:25

am jealous of you 2... I just tried the superpi and ended up with 42s on 1m.

22-11-2006, 21:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrC-3rr0r

what processor and what speed is it running at ?

lol ok E6600 at stock it was scoring 17 at 3 gig but ive clocked it down cuz I wanna sell it and not strain it

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 21:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by DocDutch

am jealous of you 2... I just tried the superpi and ended up with 42s on 1m.

LOL nothing to be jealous of : I have yet to tune the system

I just ran super-pi on my laptop 900mhz pentium-m and got 1min 50sec which is not bad at all.

DocDutch · 22-11-2006, 21:32

yeah but how old is that lappy.....and its a lappy

mine is a full sized desktop (okay 3 years old now) so yeah I think i can still be proud of only 42 secs

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 21:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by DocDutch

yeah but how old is that lappy.....and its a lappy

mine is a full sized desktop (okay 3 years old now) so yeah I think i can still be proud of only 42 secs

Yeh its a lappy running linux and it too has had it's 3rd birthday
http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/...9116235,00.htm

Historically pentium-m's are kinda special : I was gobsmacked by it's performance running seti when I got it.

The intel core 2 duo has roots set from this processor

Pentium-m > core duo > core 2 duo

still think that 21s vs 29s is way too big a gap time to trash windows

alferret · 22-11-2006, 22:07

Here's my scores.
Super PI

Stock 6600 = 20sec

@ 2800 (small o\c) 18sec (CPU @ 1.35v - Mem @ 1.8v)

@ 2880 = 17sec

The Jackal · 22-11-2006, 22:14

grrrrrr must be a big difference that cache is making to super pi results....

As I have seen others running E6400@stock getting around thge same as me.

I knew I shouldn't have scimped n saved pah : Then again I do now have a good system

Just installed linux and the super pi result was just as per windows

Druchii · 22-11-2006, 22:15

19.7secs @ 3Ghz.

Something tells me that's the cache hit, or the high latency of my CAS5 Ram.

E6300 btw.