move 100GB between PC's

GazCBG · 06-09-2009, 11:26

Hi,

What is the best way to move 100GB of data between computers.
I am using Vista Ultimate 64bit and the machine I need the data on is XP Home 32bit.

I did think about setting up an ftp server and doing that way.
Both have access to the net.

06-09-2009, 11:31

just network them and copy it over in sections . Ive done it before dont expect it to be fast but it will do it wired would be better

Are they in the same house?

Kymmy · 06-09-2009, 11:39

If in the same house I'd personally whip the HDD out of one and put in the other one, will save a lot of time later on..

Otherwise a cross-over cable directly between the two will get a better speed than going through a hub.

06-09-2009, 12:00

You could also FTP the files
http://filezilla-project.org/

GazCBG · 06-09-2009, 12:12

Yes the PC is in the same room and both connected via the router. I don't really want to take the HDD out of one PC and put in the other.
I think I will just setup a Filezilla FTP server on the XP and upload from the Vista PC, I can leave it over night if needed.

Kymmy · 06-09-2009, 12:15

I'd forget about FTP and just share the drives in windows..

06-09-2009, 12:45

yeah I second that just copy and paste had to do that kinda amount of data loads of times

Paddy1 · 06-09-2009, 13:09

USB2 or esata would be faster than over 100mb network if you have an external drive.

If you're going down the network route I think it's faster if you pull the files from destination pc, rather than push from source pc. Also, I think I read that its also faster if you actually map a drive to the source directory rather than going to "My Network Places|Entire Network|PC|directory" route.

HTH

Raistlin · 06-09-2009, 14:23

If you wanted to be really geeky you could use something like netcat to pass the data between the two machines - that would just be over complicating things for the sake of buggering around with a geeky command line application though

06-09-2009, 14:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paddy1

USB2 or esata would be faster than over 100mb network if you have an external drive.

If you're going down the network route I think it's faster if you pull the files from destination pc, rather than push from source pc. Also, I think I read that its also faster if you actually map a drive to the source directory rather than going to "My Network Places|Entire Network|PC|directory" route.

HTH

dont talk wet how can having to copying files to an external drive then having to copying them to the next machine be quicker somehow I do not think so

Raistlin · 06-09-2009, 14:25

As a thought.....depending on the type of data it might be worth compressing it before you do the transfer, that way you're transferring less data.....

06-09-2009, 14:27

but compression takes ages also. Best bet is to just chuck it across the network

Kymmy · 06-09-2009, 14:40

Depends on the network, 10-100-1000...

Druchii · 06-09-2009, 14:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by zing

dont talk wet how can having to copying files to an external drive then having to copying them to the next machine be quicker somehow I do not think so

Possible 10MB/s across the 100Mb/s network vs. Sata2 speeds of around 70-100MB/s.

I'd pick HDD-HDD vs network.

06-09-2009, 14:52

I should have took the esata out bold lol I thought it firewire lol

It was I talking wet

go out and buy yourself a nice expensive esata enclosure a hard drive and adapters for the PC to copy the data