Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Anyone know what these new dishes are???

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > General Discussion > Science & Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Digital Cameras
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2003, 22:03   #1
meld51
Inactive
 
meld51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
meld51 is on a distinguished roadmeld51 is on a distinguished road
Digital Cameras

Hello,

Does anyone know if it is necessary to use a UV filter in front of a digital camera in the same way as you do in a film camera?
meld51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 07-09-2003, 22:06   #2
Tricky
Inactive
 
Tricky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I am house...
Services: $KY+HD - BT Infinity
Posts: 2,284
Tricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful one
Not required but the same as film cameras it will stop some glare but more importantly it will protect your lens.
Tricky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2003, 22:47   #3
meld51
Inactive
 
meld51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
meld51 is on a distinguished roadmeld51 is on a distinguished road
Thanks Tricky!

The reason I mention it is that I just took a load of scenic shots which seem to be a bit washed out.

Oh well. Is there a website anywhere that discusses digital photography. Most information I see is mostly about after you capture the shot. I'm still a bit of a novice in the digital world and I find my camera to be a bit difficult at times.
meld51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 00:09   #4
Sipowicz
Inactive
 
Sipowicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Between Cambridge and Peterborough!
Age: 64
Posts: 406
Sipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about them
If your digicam has a filter thread (not many do!) then attach one by all means (just to protect the front element) Beware, some have filter threads but the lens moves beyond the filter (zooming in and out) and will foul on any attachment!

If you want a good website then try www.robgalbraith.com It is aimed at the pro end, but contains a lot of info on CF memory cards, and the forum has hints and tips on processing in photoshop and printing. It is worth a look!

Q. What camera do you have?
Sipowicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 19:36   #5
meld51
Inactive
 
meld51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
meld51 is on a distinguished roadmeld51 is on a distinguished road
I have a NIKON Coolpix 995. I really like it. It is very versatile, but I am used to film cameras of course. I'm not really sure how to get the best out of it.

For instance, with film, when you change ISO, you also affect contrast, but I'm not sure how to treat the ISO setting on my NIKON. I mean I know when I need a 'fast' setting and when I need a 'slow' setting, but with film, there is more to it than that.

When I look at books about digital photography, they seem to feature a lot of Gee whizz stuff about what you can do in the PC, and no much about the process of obtaining the best image in the first place.

Anyway I will take a look at the site recommenfded above

Thanks
meld51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 20:12   #6
altis
Inactive
 
altis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,499
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
Here's another good source of info on digital cameras:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/

I can't see anything on UV filters though.
altis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 20:26   #7
Sipowicz
Inactive
 
Sipowicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Between Cambridge and Peterborough!
Age: 64
Posts: 406
Sipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about themSipowicz has a spectacular aura about them
Quote:
Originally posted by meld51
I have a NIKON Coolpix 995. I really like it.

A good choice! I have a Coolpix 885 which I really like, but I have taken the plunge and gone for a DSLR - Canon EOS10D - I am already an EOS user in 35mm. The difference between Film and digital, is getting smaller all the time.

I have some great shots from the 885, but I never liked the amount of "noise" that I got when using the flash or very low light conditions. Outdoor shots have been pretty good!

Happy Snapping!
Sipowicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2003, 20:06   #8
Tricky
Inactive
 
Tricky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I am house...
Services: $KY+HD - BT Infinity
Posts: 2,284
Tricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful oneTricky is the helpful one
Quote:
Originally posted by Sipowicz
A good choice! I have a Coolpix 885 which I really like, but I have taken the plunge and gone for a DSLR - Canon EOS10D - I am already an EOS user in 35mm. The difference between Film and digital, is getting smaller all the time.

I have some great shots from the 885, but I never liked the amount of "noise" that I got when using the flash or very low light conditions. Outdoor shots have been pretty good!

Happy Snapping!
Right inbetween I have a Coolpix 990 and a Canon G3 - The coolpix beats the canon hands down on macro shots and low light focus. Otherwise the canon is a winner
Tricky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-09-2003, 22:31   #9
iadom
In the corner, sulking.
 
iadom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,041
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
How would the "experts" amongst you rate this camera on price/performance.?
http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/S...tml?nov-ccsp41
iadom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 06:50   #10
meld51
Inactive
 
meld51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 364
meld51 is on a distinguished roadmeld51 is on a distinguished road
I notice that trhey can't spell 'Aspherical' on the front of this camera....hope that is not a measure of the rest of the quality.

I would not buy it without seeing it first.

Seems to have limited ISO range

Runs off AA batteries. They will not last very long. Though they are readily available. Really nowadays I think cameras should run off LiIon batts.

Be Careful
meld51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 09:54   #11
altis
Inactive
 
altis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,499
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
I like AA cells. You can get a set of four 2100mAh NiMHs for about £6 - much cheaper than any replacement LIon battery. And you can use disposables if necessary. It uses Compact Flash cards too which are cheap and versatile.

BUT, it seems to be manufactured in Taiwan by J-Link. There seems to be limited support. I think I would stick to an established camera maker. Have you looked at the Canon A70 - it's only a little more expensive?
altis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 10:09   #12
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,607
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
I have to agree with Altis - AAs are far more versatile; rechargeables are cheap and if you get caught out you can just pop a set of disposable batteries in instead.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 10:46   #13
iadom
In the corner, sulking.
 
iadom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,041
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
iadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny stariadom has a nice shiny star
Thanks for that guys, I have a trusty Pentax ME Super 35mm SLR, over 20 years old now and still perfect. How do Pentax digital cameras rate with you.?
iadom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 11:18   #14
altis
Inactive
 
altis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Warrington ntl:81304 Altitude: 12m (and falling)
Posts: 4,499
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
altis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny staraltis has a nice shiny star
Mrs A's got one of those too.

Have a wander round this site. There's loads of info - but you sometimes have to hunt for it. Look out for the pull-down menu buttons. They have some good tables of the main features.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/

I always try to bear in mind the total cost of ownership. How much are spare batteries? What expansion cards are available?

I took a long look at the expansion card market and plumped for Compact Flash. See this post. Now, I wouldn't buy anything that didn't take AA batteries and have a Compact Flash socket. That's why I recommended the Canon.

Edit
Oh, and don't be conned into getting more megapixels than you need. Follow the 'www' link below to see my efforts with a lowly 2.1 megapixel camera. Even the biggest pictures on those pages are only 1/4 of that resolution. Some of my photos are spoilt more by camera shake and poor focussing than by lack of resoulution. Mind you, I hardly ever make prints from them - so, I guess, it depends what you have in mind.
altis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-09-2003, 12:54   #15
Salu
Inactive
 
Salu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Yorks
Age: 59
Services: VM TV package. VM phone and 200MB internet & slow Tivo
Posts: 2,332
Salu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronze
Salu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronze
Send a message via MSN to Salu
Quote:
Originally posted by Sipowicz
A good choice! I have a Coolpix 885 which I really like, but I have taken the plunge and gone for a DSLR - Canon EOS10D - I am already an EOS user in 35mm. The difference between Film and digital, is getting smaller all the time.

I have some great shots from the 885, but I never liked the amount of "noise" that I got when using the flash or very low light conditions. Outdoor shots have been pretty good!

Happy Snapping!
Is the Canon EOS 10D actually out now or have you just "placed the order"?
Salu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03.


Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum