07-05-2005, 09:47
|
#1
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
|
Cable Modem v STB
Hello...
Just registered with the cable forum and was hoping someone could provide a bit of advice.
I recently had NTL Broadband installed at home via the set top box (1MB connection). I wouldn't say the connection/download speed has been brilliant so I'm thinking over the idea of requesting the cable modem instead.
Can anyone tell me whether there is a noticable difference (performance wise etc) between connecting via the Cable Modem and a STB.
Also the Cable Modem installation itself...is it pretty much straight forward.
Any advice would be appreciated
cheers
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 09:50
|
#2
|
|
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Poole, Dorset
Age: 40
Services: FreeSat+
Tivo
V-Box
VM 60MBit
Posts: 13,365
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
In my experience the CableModem seems to be a lot more stable than the STB for Internet Connection, im considering requesting one myself.
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 21:51
|
#3
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,048
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
Should be no comparison really, the cable modem is dedicated to the job it only has to handle the internet.
Also with a STB are you forced to have the pc near the tv?
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 22:04
|
#4
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Services: Ntl, 1mb broadband
Posts: 4
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
They should be both the same, I have my STB connected to a Wireless Linksys router which is in another room with no problems, to check your speed try going to http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 22:32
|
#5
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South-East London
Age: 47
Services: Depends who's being serviced :p
Posts: 2,588
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
A new standalone generally won't make much difference, infact if the STB is a Samsung the cable modem / CPU in it is better than the Ambit modem.
|
|
|
07-05-2005, 22:39
|
#6
|
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: norton , teesside
Age: 57
Posts: 10,571
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
|
|
|
08-05-2005, 22:02
|
#7
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
Ok, Welcome - and I'd suggest you serve out your 12 month contract (I hope you got SOME kind of deal, like 3 for 30), and then look for better (BT line required).
A quota crippled 1Mbit for £17.99 just does not shape up against unquota'd or generous quota 512k ADSL for less money - unless you want to do not very much, twice as fast!
Until a while ago (the 300k lowest speed upgrade), STB users benefited from certain quirks in the way the speeds were handled, the only one left may be a higher upload speed.
|
|
|
11-05-2005, 14:51
|
#8
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
How easy its it to get NTL to install a cable modem as opposed to using the Samsung stb (broadband not working) I'm suppose to be at the moment
|
|
|
11-05-2005, 15:10
|
#9
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
|
Re: Cable Modem v STB
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jld
Hello...
Just registered with the cable forum and was hoping someone could provide a bit of advice.
I recently had NTL Broadband installed at home via the set top box (1MB connection). I wouldn't say the connection/download speed has been brilliant so I'm thinking over the idea of requesting the cable modem instead.
Can anyone tell me whether there is a noticable difference (performance wise etc) between connecting via the Cable Modem and a STB.
Also the Cable Modem installation itself...is it pretty much straight forward.
Any advice would be appreciated
cheers
|
Unless you've reported your slow speeds to Faults, and an engineer finds a fault that cannot be fixed, you will not be able to request an SACM. Any fake 'fault' callouts will result in a call out charge on your account too.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39.
|