07-07-2004, 13:00
|
#1
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
New DCHP Address
RM14 area
If you're running ultra-tight firewall rules (to prevent DHCP spoofing), then you may fall foul.
Now 10.185.6.129 - WAS 10.0.106.70-71
Are they still doubled, and if so, is the other one 128 or 130 ?
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 16:27
|
#2
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Poole, Dorset
Age: 94
Services: TV L Phone M BBand M
2 x V+ Boxes
Posts: 23
|
Re: New DCHP Address
BH12 area
Changed to 10.185.14.131 instead of 10.0.166.70/71
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 20:10
|
#3
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South-East London
Age: 47
Services: Depends who's being serviced :p
Posts: 2,588
|
Re: New DCHP Address
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matth
RM14 area
If you're running ultra-tight firewall rules (to prevent DHCP spoofing), then you may fall foul.
Now 10.185.6.129 - WAS 10.0.106.70-71
Are they still doubled, and if so, is the other one 128 or 130 ?
|
The other one would be .130 sir
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 20:43
|
#4
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: New DCHP Address
Thanks, from the look of it, 10.185.x.x would do (and 10.0.x.x for the old ones) unless spoofed source addresses are likely - and in that case, they could spoof the RIGHT source address anyway - like everything, it's a compromise - if you hamstring everying with really tight rules, then you have to keep correcting them.
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 08:25
|
#5
|
R.I.P.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
|
Re: New DCHP Address
10.185.x.x is a fairly big range - I run a bunch of kit on it, so if you want to put it in your firewalls it's all right by me.
I think there ought to be a list made of all the new DHCPs and you can pick your local area (they're in logical groups).
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 16:26
|
#6
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
|
Re: New DCHP Address
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
10.185.x.x is a fairly big range - I run a bunch of kit on it, so if you want to put it in your firewalls it's all right by me.
I think there ought to be a list made of all the new DHCPs and you can pick your local area (they're in logical groups).
|
But YOUR private 10.x range should not be routing to anywhere else, as anything that leaves your broadband router, should have a public source address.
You COULD spoof a private IP source address on a sent packet, but there would be no way of getting a reply.
Especially with the significance of the 10.x range in the NTL network, I would hope that they have border controls against spoofed packets.
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 21:04
|
#7
|
R.I.P.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Services: 20Mb VM CM, Virgin TV
Posts: 5,983
|
Re: New DCHP Address
Quote:
But YOUR private 10.x range should not be routing to anywhere else, as anything that leaves your broadband router, should have a public source address.
|
I was referring to my work network, not my home network. I'm very possessive about it
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 22:51
|
#8
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 62
Services: Aquiss FTTP (900M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 29,623
|
Re: New DCHP Address
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
I think there ought to be a list made of all the new DHCPs and you can pick your local area (they're in logical groups).
|
If someone supplies it - I will stick it in the knowledgebase.
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:47.
|