Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | TV Email

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media TV Service

What would be NTL move for BT Fusion
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19-06-2005, 19:26   #1
kanagarajanc
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bracknell
Posts: 17
kanagarajanc is an unknown quantity at this point
What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

I'm wondering what would NTL do to their fixed telephone lines after BT's plan of offerring combines Mobile & land line service.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4096404.stm

Right now if we need to have NTL digital TV they get packaged with NTL telephone. Will people start moving away from NTL TV & Telephone service if BT's fusion seems to be cheaper? ofcourse for the TV possibilities are Sky or Digital TV. (I meant sky with 20pound Free to View card). I think Sky still needs Telephone line to subsidise the Digibox. Not sure if BT fusion product can allow that.............

Again some people say BT fusion is not going to be a big hit. I do like the idea of paying for one phone bill and one number wherever I'm........

Any thoughts?
-Raj
kanagarajanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 20-06-2005, 02:23   #2
jrhnewark
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,267
jrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of societyjrhnewark is a pillar of society
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

It won't take off. It really won't take off.

NTL wouldn't waste their money on that sort of business. Are BT awake? Landlines are very 20th Century, as is BT. We're now in the 21st Century, but BT don't seem to realise that.
jrhnewark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2005, 09:06   #3
Jules
Inactive
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Leeds
Age: 64
Services: Don't have a clue any more.
Posts: 7,523
Jules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny stars
Jules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny starsJules has a pair of shiny stars
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

All sounds like a bit of a daft idea to me
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2005, 09:15   #4
bob_builder
Inactive
 
bob_builder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South-East-Cambridge
Services: ntl digital basepack ntl 1M broadband
Posts: 1,068
bob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to beholdbob_builder is a splendid one to behold
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

BT seem to think it is a great idea becuase people can use their mobiles at home as well as out and about and that people need cheaper rates to encourage them to do this. What they seem to be missing is that most people already use their mobiles at home (especially if they are ringing another mobile phone) and have "free" calls as part of a monthly package.

I certainly only use my landline for incoming calls, dial-up and 0800 numbers and my mobile for everything else.
bob_builder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2005, 11:28   #5
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

This is not really new technology, there are two paths in history it maps to

One - Rabbit - Use your rabbit phone around the house (it was a DECT cordless) or at a rabbit point.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2175804.stm

Two - BT did something like this about 5 years ago, didn't take off then either, probably the billing now is more seamless but still much the same product.
O2 seem to have been offering a similar product in Germany for about a decade http://shop2.o2online.de/o2/interess...pageframe.html

Here it is before fusion it used to be onephone

http://www.bt.com/userguides/downloads/btonephone.pdf

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...17/ai_19605043

It has the problem of only one mobile, also that mobile tech is fashion driven so in 12 months time the mobile will be due an upgrade and cannot be as it is part of the fusion thingy. Also lose the mobile and your home cordless is lost too.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2005, 15:38   #6
etccarmageddon
Inactive
 
etccarmageddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,638
etccarmageddon has a nice shiny star
etccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny star
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

I'm ditching my landline - it's a rip off. I'm with BT and pay around £11.50 a month line rental (correct me if I'm wrong!) plus an additional £1.50 a month for caller display. For this I get a line which is in a fixed location in the house and a real pain to put extentions on.

So as I have cable modem and not ADSL I dont need a line. I will either use Vonage or my mobile. If I use Vonage I get all my local and national calls at all times plus caller display for £10 a month and it's a normal land line phone plugged into my cable modem. Alternatively I just use my mobile which is slight more expensive but has no line rental and no caller display fees.

I recon BT will be ditching the line rental fee within the next 10 years in order to beat VOIP.
etccarmageddon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2005, 22:40   #7
Chrysalis
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,048
Chrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronze
Chrysalis is cast in bronze
Re: What would be NTL move for BT Fusion

their is still a demand for landlines, in normal circumstances I find it useful for the following.

outgoing calls, landlines are usually a lot cheaper then mobile phones. comparing base packages alike. (my mobile costs 30p a min everywhere, my landline only costs near that if ringing mobiles to other landlines I can talk for 6 hours to hit that cost)
disabled people, will again have reliance on landlines.
internet, use for pays dialup services which still has a modest demand where people dont want broadband or broadband isnt available. (bt may claim 97+ % coverage but thats not the realistic situation)
some interactive digital services on sky need a landline (I think).
business users may be tempted by this as they tend to use landlines, a fair few business's also run from homes.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob_builder
I certainly only use my landline for incoming calls, dial-up and 0800 numbers and my mobile for everything else.
I am the opposite I use my landline for outgoing and have my mobiel for the purpose that people can contact me easier in other words for incoming calls, I only use it for outgoing in emergencies.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:08.


Server: lithium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum