Derby, you've let me down!!!

Paul K · 14-03-2006, 19:08

24dash

Quote:

A father-of-14 is demanding a larger house for him to share with his wife, girlfriend and eight of their children.
Mick Philpott, 49, says his council house in Allenton, Derby, is too cramped to accommodate his clan and he wants the city council to rehouse them.
Today, a Derby City Council spokeswoman said: "He has only been on the waiting list since February 24. They already have the biggest available council property in Derby."
Mr Philpott lives with his girlfriend, Lisa Willis, who is expecting his 15th child, and his wife Mairead. The two women are understood to get on well.

Quote:

"They're just not good enough. I love my country, but at the moment I feel ashamed of it. I think the country is going down the pan."
The family live on ÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…Â¡ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£508 per week benefits, which are awarded to the two women, along with income from Mrs Philpott's part-time job at a local hospital.
He is also father to six other children, aged 19, 18, 15, eight, seven and five months from three other relationships.

Anyone else thinking that this waste of space shoulf fe*k off and support his own children or shut the fe*k up?? If you want 14 children then you should be able to fully house and support them yourself in my opinion.

**Damien** · 14-03-2006, 19:10

Girlfriend and a wife? What the hell is up with this guy

Chris W · 14-03-2006, 19:11

my suggestion...

snip snip.

14-03-2006, 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul

24dash

Quote:

A father-of-14 is demanding a larger house for him to share with his wife, girlfriend and eight of their children.
Mick Philpott, 49, says his council house in Allenton, Derby, is too cramped to accommodate his clan and he wants the city council to rehouse them.
Today, a Derby City Council spokeswoman said: "He has only been on the waiting list since February 24. They already have the biggest available council property in Derby."
Mr Philpott lives with his girlfriend, Lisa Willis, who is expecting his 15th child, and his wife Mairead. The two women are understood to get on well.

Quote:

"They're just not good enough. I love my country, but at the moment I feel ashamed of it. I think the country is going down the pan."
The family live on ÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…Â¡ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£508 per week benefits, which are awarded to the two women, along with income from Mrs Philpotts part-time job at a local hospital.
He is also father to six other children, aged 19, 18, 15, eight, seven and five months from three other relationships.

Anyone else thinking that this waste of space should fe*k off and support his own children or shut the fe*k up?? If you want 14 children then you should be able to fully house and support them yourself in my opinion.

You know its bad when anything you say about this waste of space would have to be bleeped out by the swear filter if you typed it in the forum.

so i will do it visually.

Paul K · 14-03-2006, 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris W

my suggestion...

snip snip.

Mine would be crack crack with a pair of bricks

Can't make my mind up who has the lowest IQ, the council, him or the women that keep falling pregnant by him???? In my honest opinion this guy should be told where to go. If he wants 14 or 15 kids then he should be ready, willing and able to support them without state handouts.

Stuart · 14-03-2006, 19:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris W

my suggestion...

snip snip.

Or use of the device mentioned in your sig.. Condoms.

**Damien** · 14-03-2006, 19:22

14 kids is far to much anyway. They are gonna be lucky to grow up well-adjusited

14-03-2006, 19:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

14 kids is far to much anyway. They are gonna be lucky to grow up well-adjusited

unfortunately they are likely to grow up with the same attitude as their father - that the world owes them a living & they don't have to take any responsibility for their own actions ...

driver_problems · 14-03-2006, 20:14

the only thing to blame is our own toothless system for not recognising this issue for the folly it is. These people laugh at the system and the people who pay taxes. The welfare state was not brought in with this scenario in mind.

...What will happen about it? - nothing, that's what - he will get his larger house and when the next bl**dy kid is born the midwife can slap it on the ar$e and say "congratulations you've just given birth to another dole bludging car thief"

**Damien** · 14-03-2006, 20:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by driver_problems

the only thing to blame is our own toothless system for not recognising this issue for the folly it is. These people laugh at the system and the people who pay taxes. The welfare state was not brought in with this scenario in mind.

...What will happen about it? - nothing, that's what - he will get his larger house and when the next bl**dy kid is born the midwife can slap it on the ar$e and say "congratulations you've just given birth to another dole bludging car thief"

Its a rip but what would you suggest? The point of benefit is to make sure the child(ren) are ok.

14-03-2006, 20:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Quote:

Originally Posted by driver_problems

the only thing to blame is our own toothless system for not recognising this issue for the folly it is. These people laugh at the system and the people who pay taxes. The welfare state was not brought in with this scenario in mind.

...What will happen about it? - nothing, that's what - he will get his larger house and when the next bl**dy kid is born the midwife can slap it on the are and say "congratulations you've just given birth to another dole bludging car thief"

Its a rip but what would you suggest? The point of benefit is to make sure the children) are ok.

So spend a bit on a compulsory snip and then there will be no need to waste any more money on more kids. In my world he would be forced into a snip. "sits back and waits for Human rights statements"

**Damien** · 14-03-2006, 21:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill C

So spend a bit on a compulsory snip and then there will be no need to waste any more money on more kids. In my world he would be forced into a snip. "sits back and waits for Human rights statements"

14-03-2006, 21:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill C

So spend a bit on a compulsory snip and then there will be no need to waste any more money on more kids. In my world he would be forced into a snip. "sits back and waits for Human rights statements"

So do you think it is right that this person can have as many kids as he wants which then puts a strain on the already overburdened state benefits system . And don't say education as i am sure by now he knows what happens when you do it.

I for one are sick to the back teeth with people scrounging of the state benefits system why those of us who pay our tax's get sod all out of it. I am waiting for a appointment over a problem with my sholder i have to wait months and months. Bet this bugger would go stright to the front of the que.

**Damien** · 14-03-2006, 21:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill C

So do you think it is right that this person can have as many kids as he wants which then puts a strain on the already overburdened state benefits system . And don't say education as i am sure by now he knows what happens when you do it.

I for one are sick to the back teeth with people scrounging of the state benefits system why those of us who pay into it get sod all.

I think he has had too many children. I already stated that.

But do you honestly think forcing surgery on him to stop his ability to give birth is not a massive breach of human rights? Like it or not this man has broken no law and we do not have the right to violate his body because we do not like what he is up too.

We are not a barbaric country.

14-03-2006, 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill C

So do you think it is right that this person can have as many kids as he wants which then puts a strain on the already overburdened state benefits system . And don't say education as i am sure by now he knows what happens when you do it.

I for one are sick to the back teeth with people scrounging of the state benefits system why those of us who pay into it get sod all.

I think he has had too many children. I already stated that.

But do you honestly think forcing surgery on him to stop his ability to give birth is not a massive breach of human rights? Like it or not this man has broken no law and we do not have the right to violate his body because we do not like what he is up too.

We are not a barbaric country.

In that case remove his benefits for any more kids. Simpley make him pay for them. Why should i or anyone else have to fund his bedroom PT.

---------- Post added at 21:21 ---------- Previous post was at 21:19 ----------

[quote=Damien]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill C

We are not a barbaric country.

Depends which part of the country your in sometimes.