Quote:
Originally Posted by awibble
not sure how they think its going to delay the country so long. I know im not everything, but including the other halfs family, there is only 2 house that are not HD ready (brother-in-laws he only moved in last week, and one of my granparents) The others now all have V+ or Sky HD boxes on order or installed. (10 houses in total). So i think what will happen is that more and more people will not want to pay TV liences.
|
Oh Buddha .... *Please* let's not make this another TV licence thread. The existence or otherwise of a TV licence won't affect this. The overwhelming majority of TV viewing that goes on in this country is of free-to-air public service channels. Their funding model is entirely besides the point.
I disagree with your suggestion that more people will go for Pay TV. Satellite and cable have been around for decades now and have still failed to get into as many as a third of the households in the UK. There is no sign of any breakthrough that would make a significant difference to the overall pay-TV market.
The BBC's submission to OFCOM is a very pertinent one. When you look at what was bid for the spectrum now used for 3G phone services, there is absolutely no way any TV network could afford to pay that kind of money. Ofcom (and the Treasury) needs to bite the bullet and accept that it simply can't auction off the analogue TV bandwidth as a quick way of reducing the national debt. If these frequencies are not made available to ensure there is an upgrade path for Freeview onto MPEG4 and HD transmissions, then exactly where are most UK households going to get HD TV from? As I already said, they have declined to pay for their TV for decades, despite the availability of alternatives.
---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 11:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMcB
|
Signed.