Apologies for the vague introduction. Being fixated on the forthcoming change, I forgot to mention that I should be on the 1Mb/s service.Mick, thanks for the welcome and for the pointer to a definitive NTL test location. See results below.
Although it might be tempting fate, I've actually been very happy with NTL broadband overall but I greatly fear any changes. It's seems that individually NTL people are helpful, polite souls but as an organisation, well you know the rest!
From
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robin.d...speedtest.html
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:07:08 UTC
1st 128K took 875 ms = 149797 Bytes/sec = approx 1246 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1047 ms = 125188 Bytes/sec = approx 1042 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
But interestingly,
rom
www.bandwidthplace.com
709 kilobits per second
Communications 709 kilobits per second
Storage 86.6 kilobytes per second
1MB file download 11.8 seconds
Subjective rating Good
Info
Date & time Friday, July 23, 11:08AM*
Test type IDT4 Free
Connection type Cable
Region United Kingdom
Data size 605KB
IP address 81.107.138.112
Provider RIPE Network Coordination Centre
and
From
http://www.beelinebandwidthtest.com/
688 kbp/s
Thankls to you all for your contributions,
Pete