|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
For those who watched PMQs today (04-Feb-26), it will have been noticed that Kemi totally nailed Starmer. Kemi was questioning Starmer's judgement in appointing Mandelson and she asked whether or not Starmer knew that Mandelson was still in contact with Epstein after his conviction.
He admitted that he knew about the relevant Mandelson contact with Epstein which is why he referred that knowledge to the vetting process.
So, Starmer was utterly skewered. You could see it akin to a fox staring into the truck's headlights. I've never seen Starmer so subdued (nor his backbench MPs) and at a loss as to what he could say to put himself into a better light.
Kemi did well.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
