Thread: A Duty To Die?
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2010, 13:36   #75
Lord Nikon
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NW UK
Posts: 3,546
Lord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze array
Lord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze arrayLord Nikon has a bronze array
Re: A Duty To Die?

Surely a simple '5 majority' rule would prevent spurious usage.
5 doctors each have to give a report on the patient's condition, if a majority agree that the condition is
1) Permanent
2) Causing distress TO THE PATIENT
3) No treatment possible for the long term alleviation of the symptoms

Then the termination may go ahead, if the above criteria can not be met then there is no justification, if less than 3 doctors agree, then there can be no justification.

Simple enough
Lord Nikon is offline   Reply With Quote