Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Could you explain that for me, please, as now you are talking in riddles.
I said I envisage that in the future, we would probably end up with packages of streaming services rather than channels on cable tv. Against that comment, your response doesn't appear to make sense. Are you referring to something else?
To be perfectly clear, if Virgin offered broadband and a package of streaming services that you could take instead of TV channels, I would take it. I cannot subscribe in this way at present because such a deal is not on offer.
As you know, I attach great importance to having all my streaming services on one box.
|
Why don’t you just buy broadband from someone else? Vodafone are doing it for £20 a month. Then some streaming.
Easy.
Except it’s not. Streaming doesn’t offer the compelling content that’s the bread and butter of pay-tv in this country.
You attach an importance to something unrealisable if you want it all on one box with integrated menus and search functions. Disney don’t want to direct you to Viacom content, or Netflix content, or NBC content.
If you think they do then you’ve missed the point altogether. If you are relying on a platform to offer it then it’s no different to Sky or Virgin now.
---------- Post added at 22:08 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Max
Maybe that's because you keep knocking back all the evidence that he provides, and i do think that he does subscribe to some streaming services, isn't that what he said was the future?
|
Opinion pieces from digital marketing companies isn’t evidence.