Thread: Brexit (Old)
View Single Post
Old 15-07-2018, 20:36   #501
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,961
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: Brexit Discussion (New thread-Follow First Post Rules!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
The problem is, that there is no one agreed definition of "proper/true Brexit" - to some people it means one thing, to others, something else, so it will be impossible to reach agreement.
... which is precisely the line the continuity remain campaign has been pushing for the last 2 years. It all began with the appearance in the media of the terms “hard” and “soft” Brexit.

The idea that nobody really knows what Brexit means is nonsense. During the referendum campaign, the remain campaign was as clear about what Brexit would mean as the leave campaign was. At the time, Remain thought that the unalloyed truth - out of the single market, out of the customs union all the rest - would scare people into voting their way. It didn’t work. As a result they switched to plan B, which has always been to muddy the waters enough that people either wouldn’t notice us failing to properly leave the EU, or else would come to believe that fully leaving the EU (aka Brexit, or, indeed, what the majority voted for) would indeed be a tragedy and a so-called “soft” Brexit (not really leaving at all) was preferable.
Chris is offline