Originally Posted by tweetiepooh

On the glass floor business I'd say there is a difference between taking a picture that happens to show up outer garments and deliberately positioning so you can capture that subject. It comes to intent and that can be harder to prove than the act itself.

That's why it is important to legislate properly. You don't want to prosecute someone who takes a photo of a glass ceiling that happens to have people walking over it but you may want to handle it differently if someone sets up in that location for the purpose of capturing images up garments.

Similarly if a woman is "exposed" either because of shortness of skirt or wind lifting up that garment there is a difference between a photo that includes that "exposure" and one "focussed" (sic) on that "exposure".