Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Why would a company who does streaming and linear have to pay for rights twice?
I'm unsure if you are deliberately misrepresenting points or whether you are genuinely incapable of understanding them.
|
My understanding is that if a channel has the right to screen a programme on a tv channel, it has to pay more to screen it on demand.
Similarly, I guess that if you have the right to add a programme to a streaming service, you will need to pay more to show it on the TV channel. Is that not correct, then? I think it is.
There is no deliberate misrepresentation on my part, but glad to be corrected if I'm wrong.
---------- Post added at 16:04 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
According to you its you who knows everything and nobody else knows nothing...
|
No, I'm just looking at the facts and drawing obvious conclusions.
You seem to look at every prediction for the future and assume nothing will change.
I accept that's what you think, Den. I just don't agree with you.
We are just having a conversation. I don't mind if you disagree, as long as it's not just to cause an argument.
---------- Post added at 16:07 ---------- Previous post was at 16:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11
Like a lot of the content is available on the UKTV channels or platforms like Sky have deals with the BBC for Boxsets of its content.
|
There is a lot of archive material that will be on Britbox that is not available anywhere else.
As far as the UKTV channels are concerned, I have heard that the BBC-owned ones might be closing soon, but it may just be a rumour. They will go eventually, though, of that I am certain.