View Single Post
Old 16-03-2019, 13:22   #20
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Glad I don't live in the US of A

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Maybe because 3 companies manufacture 90% of all the world’s insulin, and they set the prices in each market?

https://www.t1international.com/blog...-so-expensive/

The Australian government subsidises their insulin.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...2eb3e235657c6a
The study I was using came a year before that announcement, and if I reading this correctly they used the unsubsidised prices, ie what the Australian government pays.

Quote:
Prices were expressed as a Median Price Ratio (MPR) i.e. a ratio of the local price to a standard set of international reference prices (IRPs). Thus, MPRs describe how much greater or less the price of an insulin product is compared to the IRP. The WHO/HAI methodology recommends Management Sciences for Health’s International Drug Price Indicator Guide as the source of the international reference price (IRP). However, the Guide does not include prices for analogue insulins so was of limited value. Therefore, prices from the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) [27] were used as IRPs. PBS prices represented reimbursement prices paid by the Australian government. We standardized all prices (PBS and the prices collected in Hubei) to US$ for 1000 IU insulin then calculated the MPRs.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote