View Single Post
Old 23-01-2023, 16:00   #62
jonbxx
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: #Plagueisland
Age: 53
Services: VM VIP Pack
Posts: 1,668
jonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appeal
jonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appealjonbxx has a bronzed appeal
Re: Cable Forum Vaccinations (Booster)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 View Post
It is only a [serious] argument if you can provide authoritative, peer reviewed evidence that shows, beyond reasonable doubt, that Covid is less dangerous than the vaccine for the age/risk group you are focussing on. I see no evidence seriously being debated & concluded in the public domain.

Don't forget, repeat serious infection from Covid, infections that are mitigated by vaccines, risk Long Covid which can include long term degradation of your immune system with all the consequences that entails.
This paper - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0 is our friend here. It looks at the relative risks of the various vaccines and SARS-COV-2 infections. For the over 40s, the risk of myocarditis is higher with infection vs. vaccines. For under 40s, there is a higher risk with the Moderna vaccine than with infection.

Note that this is for myocarditis which is often mild. For pericarditis and arrhythmias, there seems to be no significant risk with vaccinations but there is for infection. Pericarditis and in particular arrhythmias tend to be more dangerous than myocarditis.

This paper looked at risks of heart issues only. COVID has many more risky symptoms than just heart issues.
jonbxx is offline   Reply With Quote